Channel
@explaining
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
105,274subscribers
-422 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001266185090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @explaining |
| Description | Простым языком о сложной политике. Связь с редакцией - @politgidych Реестр РКН - https://clck.ru/3FG8Kf |
| Created | 21 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/explaining |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:26 | 105,274 | -165 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:35 | 105,439 | -28 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 105,467 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 105,498 | -20 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 105,518 | -36 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 105,554 | -32 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 105,586 | -43 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 105,629 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 105,649 | -48 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 105,697 | -52 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 105,749 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 105,775 | -18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:44 | 105,793 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 105,804 | -30 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:44 | 105,834 | -22 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 105,856 | -63 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 105,919 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 105,931 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 105,948 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 105,965 | first reading |
312 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 183 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 312 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,933,110 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 93 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Путин заявил о важной роли русского языка На пленарном заседании Международной недели «Народы России» Владимир Путин поздравил страну с Днём народного единства. Важный акцент президент сделал на межнациональном согласии. --------- Посыл следующий: русский народ и русский язык — это база нашей государственности. Как подчеркнул Путин, именно своей объединительной и созидающей миссией наш язык является гарантом сохране…
Что там с промежуточными выборами в США? В Штатах подвели предварительные итоги выборов в Конгресс. Судя по прогнозам ведущих американских СМИ, Демократическая партия триумфально возвращает контроль над Палатой представителей, забирает большинство в Сенате и выигрывает ключевые губернаторские посты. ---------- По сути, для республиканцев это настоящий холодный душ и разгром. Демократы смогли победить даже в историче…
Что там с масштабным ужесточением для самокатов и курьеров? Минтранс подготовил проект масштабных правок в ПДД: курьерам хотят полностью запретить движение по тротуарам, катание вдвоём на самокатах объявят вне закона, а для управления мощными электробайками и СИМ обяжут получать права категории М. ----------- Если коротко, то правила пытаются пересобрать с нуля. Мощные самокаты и электровелосипеды (от 250 Вт) теперь…
Хорошо в Вашингтоне устроились. Просят устраивать банкет за чужой счёт 🤨
Как выборы в США аукнутся миру? В США 3 ноября пройдут промежуточные выборы. Эксперты уверены, что хотя самих американцев международная повестка волнует мало, итоги этого голосования повлияют на внешнюю политику Вашингтона. ----------- Если коротко, то расклад такой. Демократы наверняка заберут палату представителей, но Трамп уже придумал, как обойти этот блок. Если конгрессмены начнут вставлять ему палки в колеса, …
Ну понесло, в солярии, походу, перегрелся. Трамп предложил бы атаковать Хошимин, который во время боевых действий назывался Сайгоном и был столицей союзного Вашингтону Южного Вьетнама 😅
Запад делает из Арктического совета «чемодан без ручки» В МИД РФ заявили, что западные страны пытаются усидеть на двух стульях: надеются сохранить Арктический совет на будущее, но одновременно затягивают туда НАТО и активно милитаризируют регион. ---------- Арктический совет годами был адекватной площадкой, где приполярные государства спокойно тёрли за экологию, науку и судоходство даже в периоды политических кризис…
Не стоит забывать, что у конфликта есть и киберфронт
Что там с президентскими выборами в Болгарии? Исполняющая обязанности президента Илиана Йотова уверенно побеждает во втором туре. Она открыто выступает за возобновление диалога с Москвой и против военной помощи Украине. ---------- Йотова набрала почти 58% голосов, оставив позади ставленника прозападной оппозиции Андрея Гюрова. Фишка в том, что пост президента в Болгарии хоть и считается во многом церемониальным, но …
Что там с «госпереворотом» в Польше? В Варшаве разгорелся острейший кризис вокруг Конституционного трибунала: попытка сместить руководство суда вылилась в ночную потасовку с личным участием президента страны Кароля Навроцкого. ----------- Суть замеса проста: премьер Дональд Туск и правый президент Кароль Навроцкий устроили открытую схватку за контроль над Конституционным трибуналом. Сторонники Туска попытались прове…
Что за гуманитарная операция прошла в Алешках? Россия и Украина провели первую с начала конфликта совместную гуманитарную операцию. Делегации во главе с омбудсменами Яной Лантратовой и Дмитрием Лубинцом организовали эвакуацию мирных жителей из города Алешки в Херсонской области при посредничестве первой леди США Мелании Трамп. ---------- Суть в том, что сторонам удалось согласовать и строго выдержать режим прекращен…
Может не надо? Некоторые депутаты и так кучу всякой фигни генерируют, а с нейронками их производительность лишь возрастёт 😱
Showing the 12 most recent of 312 posts we hold for @explaining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@explaining edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПолитГид” (@explaining), 105,274 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/explaining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.