Кибератаки, по словам ЦИКа, уже третий день идут. Но толку от них нет. Цифровую инфраструктуру выборов сделали уж очень устойчивой ко внешнему воздействию.

Channel
ПолитГид
@explaining
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
106,718subscribers
+1,022 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001266185090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @explaining |
| Description | Простым языком о сложной политике. Связь с редакцией - @politgidych Реестр РКН - https://clck.ru/3FG8Kf |
| Created | 21 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/explaining |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 106,718 | -45 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 106,763 | -88 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 106,851 | -101 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 106,952 | -154 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 107,106 | -84 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 107,190 | -85 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 107,275 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 107,311 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:34 | 107,380 | -68 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 107,448 | +168 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 107,280 | +109 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 107,171 | +70 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 107,101 | +163 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 106,938 | +143 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 106,795 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 106,829 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 106,870 | +189 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 106,681 | +242 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 106,439 | +173 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 106,266 | first reading |
Engagement
170 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.6%
- avg views ÷ 106,718 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 20,900
- 97 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 97
- of 170 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (30 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,030,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,850
- Videos
- ≈432
- Links
- ≈1,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 17s
- Average length
- 1m 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Полтора дня выборов идут довольно спокойно. Только внешние факторы периодически создают проблемы: кибератаки и атаки дронов.
Что там с голосованием за рубежом на выборах в Госдуму? В России проходят выборы депутатов Госдумы, и проголосовать можно далеко за пределами страны — для сограждан открыли более 300 избирательных участков в 150+ государствах. ---------- Схема участия для наших людей за границей сделана максимально простой. Потенциальная аудитория там приличная — свыше 1,8 млн избирателей (как постоянные резиденты, так и обычные тур…
Ранее в сети появлялась информация, как «Яблоко» обучает своих наблюдателей провокациям на избирательных участках. Вот так наобучали. В сети попалось видео: мужчина что-то передаёт девушке. Наблюдатель от «Яблока» решает, что поймал подкуп избирателя, подходит разбираться и требует показать паспорта. Сенсация? Нет. Выяснилось, что это муж и жена. Никакого подкупа, естественно, не было. Видео наблюдатель отправил сво…
Вообще, Путин уже несколько раз голосовал онлайн, начиная с 2021 года. Так что это уже устоявшаяся традиция президента для популяризации ДЭГ.
Что там с международными наблюдателями на выборах в Госдуму? Глава ЦИК Элла Памфилова сообщила, что следить за выборами в Госдуму приехали более 1,2 тысячи международных наблюдателей из 133 стран мира. Иностранные делегации уже активно работают на избирательных участках по всей стране — от Москвы и Кузбасса до ЛНР, где в качестве общественных наблюдателей задействованы представители самых разных государств, включая …
Действия Штатов объяснимы: перед большой сделкой с Россией надо заключить несколько маленьких, чтобы приблизить большую. РФ тут только в плюсе.
Что там с ЕДГ-2026? В России стартовал трёхдневный единый день голосования — с 18 по 20 сентября. Главная интрига — формирование Госдумы девятого созыва, но одновременно с этим проходят выборы глав 11 регионов, парламентов в 39 субъектах и депутатов в 10 региональных столицах. ---------- Если коротко, то размах кампании колоссальный: на кону более 20 тысяч мандатов разного уровня. За места в Госдуме борются 10 парти…
Штука полезная, конечно, но есть один риск. Если выплата становится автоматической и обезличенной, теряется часть символического капитала (церемония вручения, публичное признание), который изначально был частью замысла.
5G пока нормально не заработал в Москве «Известия» протестировали мобильную связь пятого поколения от операторов «большой четвёрки» и выяснили, что сверхбыстрый интернет в столице работает пока скорее номинально. ---------- Операторы бодро отчитались о запуске сетей 5G, но на деле никакого технологического прорыва рядовые пользователи не ощутили. По результатам замеров в популярных локациях столицы — от вокзалов и «…
Опять обещания-прогнозы от Трампа. Уже сколько их было — всё мимо цели. Но, похоже, среди его сторонников находятся те, кто верит его словам и забывает прошлые косяки. Хотя, при таких частых заявлениях, когда-нибудь точно будет прав.
ДЭГ становится всё популярнее На выборах 2026 года число заявок на участие в дистанционном электронном голосовании (ДЭГ) выросло более чем в 1,5 раза по сравнению с 2021 годом: 4,1 млн против 2,6 млн человек. При этом география системы расширилась с 7 до 33 регионов. ----------- Главная причина роста — избиратели банально «распробовали» формат. Возможность сделать свой выбор через Госуслуги или столичную платформу б…
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @explaining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@explaining edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mysly · 160,924#1
@variantnews · 133,414#2
@polittemnik · 201,201#3
@go338 · 143,403#4
@oko_ok · 127,094#5
@rosskandal · 123,918#6
@new_world_Z · 108,425#7
@Z_strana · 112,466#8
@stranoved · 115,552#9
@maester · 301,661#10
@terrupr · 80,887#11
@af_nikit · 8,003#12
@politadequate · 258,970#13
@fakecontrol · 107,715#14
@top_biz · 106,379#15
@RusUnlimited · 106,048#16
@ia_steklomoy · 110,015#17
@v9utra · 74,188#18
@karaulny · 120,244#19
@PolitTransit · 85,645#20
@mislinemisli · 153,990#21
@itiltg · 75,567#22
@trubapodneglinnoy · 135,493#23
@mardanaka · 208,266#24
@decembrist_spb · 78,157#25
@kremlebezBashennik · 67,058#26
@economika · 143,492#27
@hellotransfer · 423,472#28
@kremlin_bashnya · 7,504#29
@actual_comment · 1,028#30
@vibornyk · 101,270#31
@pltrk · 5,667#32
@vprorok · 12,854#33
@staraya · 90,826#34
@neduma · 2,536#35
@vizioner_rf · 78,782#36
@alenasivkova · 1,631#37
@prispru · 453#38
@stukch · 12,442#39
@boilerroomchannel · 226,154#40
@operdrain · 125,664#41
@Nikitina_Life · 246#42
@WCIOMofficial · 17,254#43
@obuhovpro · 5,636#44
@kstati_p · 233,639#45
@kompr · 47,630#46
@RIAKremlinpool · 68,081#47
@ddofa · 194,882#48
@rostov_na_konu · 93,112#49
@regnum_na · 68,422#50
@nom24 · 3,650#51
@SerpomPo · 57,343#52
@Vinogradov74 · 28,200#53
@ru_global · 54,489#54
@Contora_Pishet · 93,584#55
@steven_bb · 702,168#56
@evgenyprimakov · 19,695#57
@moskovskiyPul · 174,438#58
@gusev_tg · 20,444#59
@docpro · 139,650#60
@kbrvdvkr · 80,393#61
@dddjournalism · 131,033#62
@streli_kazbeka · 128,064#63
@regdurdom · 101,042#64
@prosmis · 102,305#65
@politjoystic · 250,578#66
@southtower · 111,696#67
@Ms_krasota · 63,614#68
@topgun_spb · 35,231#69
@TelegaKubani · 115,683#70
@mnews_ru · 200,147#71
@belgorpost · 61,256#72
@basmannoesamoupravlenie · 720#73
@besedki_nasedki · 61,177#74
@imerkouri · 58,885#75
@mediatech · 147,643#76
@kprfmgd · 368#77
@guber2 · 4,122#78
@kitchen_chef · 84,311#79
@blacklander · 48,942#80
@nightguber · 51,059#81
@volgograd_tg · 45,375#82
@vashbashdomovoy · 43,704#83
@MedvedevVesti · 183,151#84
@PRiangarskie · 42,313#85
@niemandswasser · 8,928#86
@primorchannel · 54,213#87
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,426#88
@kshulika · 52,845#89
@Gubery · 84,149#90
@zakuliska · 36,631#91
@stormdaily · 73,617#92
@kurskpost · 34,154#93
@gov_korotko · 28,609#94
@nashirayony · 2,723#95
@kleveta · 10,313#96
@vybora · 38,775#97
@planerka_org · 48,694#98
@shorohi64 · 42,637#99
@pzdcofficial · 53,773#100
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@top_biz · 106,379
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@new_world_Z · 108,425
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@steven_bb · 702,168
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@Z_strana · 112,466
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@v9utra · 74,188
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@terrupr · 80,887
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@RusUnlimited · 106,048
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@besedki_nasedki · 61,177
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@Ms_krasota · 63,614
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@itiltg · 75,567
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
@mysly · 160,924
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@variantnews · 133,414
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@kitchen_chef · 84,311
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@fakecontrol · 107,715
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@docpro · 139,650
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@PolitTransit · 85,645
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@blacklander · 48,942
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
@oko_ok · 127,094
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@prosmis · 102,305
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
@neuroskep · 29,484
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@kurskpost · 34,154
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@productivity_Q · 26,585
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
@navigator_32 · 23,977
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@topgun_spb · 35,231
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПолитГид” (@explaining), 106,718 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/explaining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.