Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вечерний Дурново

Channel

Вечерний Дурново

@eveningdurnovo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,774subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393736017
TypeChannel
Username@eveningdurnovo
Created20 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eveningdurnovo

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,7747,8417,807.56 August 2026 — 7,841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,841 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,831 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,826 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,819 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,814 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,818 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,823 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,814 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,811 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,801 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,785 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,780 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,774 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,764–7,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:377,774-6
13 Sept 2026, 12:597,780-5
9 Sept 2026, 08:567,785-16
3 Sept 2026, 15:147,801-10
30 Aug 2026, 22:547,811-3
27 Aug 2026, 15:127,814-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:377,823+5
21 Aug 2026, 04:427,818+4
18 Aug 2026, 14:477,814-5
15 Aug 2026, 11:567,819-7
12 Aug 2026, 11:337,826-5
9 Aug 2026, 00:517,831-10
6 Aug 2026, 03:057,841no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:377,841first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 7,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,320
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held25 (14 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total2,320
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,841 reactions across 24 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,08028.1%
❤76820.0%
💯70718.4%
😁53513.9%
🔥2777.21%
😢701.82%
👏611.59%
🤡571.48%
💩561.46%
👎421.09%
🏆411.07%
🤣190.495%
🙏180.469%
👌120.312%
🤬120.312%
❤‍🔥100.26%
🤔100.26%
🤝100.26%
🤷‍♂100.26%
🤯80.208%
14 further kinds380.989%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,949 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC≈2,320 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Абсурдная, но с легкой примесью величия, серия пенальти в матче "Ривер Плейт" "Индепендьенте" Санта-Фе в Судамерикане. По 11 ударов. Три сейва вратаря "Ривера" Санти Бельтрана, причем дважды он оставлял "Ривер" в игре после промахов партнёров. Вратарь "Индепендьенте" валился в первый попавшийся угол, из 11 ударов угадал 1, и отбил... И вот, пара номер одиннадцать. Точка, как водится в Южной Америке, превратилась в ям…

😢35❤14👍7💯5

24 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈2,880 views114 reactionsread 28 August 2026

В том вся прелесть звания "чемпиона по игре", что любой может себя таковым объявить. "Мы проиграли, но играли лучше". Я думаю, эта фраза родилась на полтора часа позже футбола.

😁61👍28🤡19❤3👎2👏1

18 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈5,250 views190 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Не думал, что трансфер Батракова в «Галатасарай» может вызвать что-то типа общественной дискуссии. Вроде бы, тут все как дважды два, но я не могу пройти мимо людей, которые бурно не одобряют переезд молодого игрока в Турцию, объясняя свое неодобрение тем, что Батраков, мол, эгоистично оставляет РПЛ без себя… Причем ведь многие это все формируют через гениальное «надо было»… Уважаемые «надобыльшики»! Во-первых, …

👍109❤43💯37🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈10,600 views276 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Мы никогда не узнаем, какое количество потенциальных футбольных звёзд не дошли даже до первого контракта из-за того, что их родители сказали: "Сынок, чушь этот твой футбол!" или "Выкинь из головы, иди работай" или просто не стали водить их в секцию, футбольную школу, академию. Хорхе Месси, которому надо было кормить семью, бросил завод, занялся делами сына, перевез его через океан, год ждал согласия Бегиристайна, что…

❤152💯74👍32🔥10❤‍🔥4🤮3🏆1

6 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈6,580 views181 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Как же я рад, что Родри не перейдёт в "Реал"!

👍77💯39😁21💩14❤7👎7🤔6🤡5

31 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC≈9,100 views231 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Почему текст о Франко Барези открывается фотографией с Марадоной? Потому что в 1984-м после матча «Наполи» - «Милан» Диего сам подошел к Франко Барези и попросил поменяться футболками. Капитан «Милана» буквально жалил Марадону своими хирургическими подкатами, и позже Диего называл Барези «совершенным защитником», признавая, что оппонента сильнее у него не было. К моменту их первой встречи Барези уже был чемпионом …

❤130👍71🙏18🔥4⚡3🏆2💔2👏1

28 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC≈6,490 views106 reactionsread 28 August 2026

- Если бы я предложил вам на выбор бой с Горой или секс с Лолис, вы бы уже снимали штаны. Этот отрывок из диалога Бронна с Тирионом очень хорошо подходит к истории с Пирло и сборной Италии. В "Игре Престолов" вообще предусмотрены цитаты на все случаи жизни)

😁68👍24❤4🤯4🔥3🏆1💯1🤡1

21 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈12,700 views188 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Занятно наблюдать, как люди, которые громче всех кричат про грубость и хамство аргентинцев на поле, сами позволяют себе хамство и грубость в адрес тех, кто с ними не согласен. Это же совершенно разные вещи, не так ли…

👍81❤49👏20👎11😁7💯5🤡5🆒4

21 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈8,700 views216 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Собрал в кучку впечатления от чемпионата мира и, скажем так, новшеств. - Расширение. Оно превратило групповой этап в болото. Двенадцать групп, 72 матча (больше чем за любой предыдущий чемпионат мира целиком). Топ-матчей на групповом этапе всегда не очень много, но здесь доля их размыта. На каждый матч Англии с Хорватией приходится по несколько матчей уровня Гаити – Шотландия или Иордания – Алжир. Разрыв в уровне то…

👍132👏38🔥19❤12👎9🤔3🤡1😡1

20 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC≈5,900 views158 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Выиграть два подряд чемпионата мира мало кому удалось. Италии еще до Войны, Бразилии – в конце 50-х, начале 60-х. С тех пор пытались многие: Аргентина, Бразилия, Франция, вновь Аргентина. Но это должно быть значительно сложнее, чем выиграть два подряд Евро, две подряд Лиги Чемпионов или же взять два подряд Золотых Мяча. Тут надо за четыре года стать лучшей версией себя. Хотя… Италия-1938 очень далекий пример. Подоз…

👍82❤36🔥27🏆6🥱5✍1👏1

19 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC≈4,640 views224 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Двукратный чемпион мира - великое достижение. Одно из редких недевальвировшихся в безумном современном мире. Нельзя достичь этой вершины делая то, что делала сегодня сборная Аргентины. Нельзя выиграть финал чемпионата мира, нанеся первый удар на сто двадцать какой-то минуте. Нельзя стать двукратным чемпионом мира, не играя в футбол в ключевом матче.

👍121💯82❤13🤝8

19 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC≈4,770 views208 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Паредес мог штук пять желтых во втором тайме получить. Кажется, сила одного его бывшего клуба все еще пребывает с ним.

😁126💯52👍12❤11💩7

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @eveningdurnovo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

«Футбольный клуб» Василия Уткина
@QryaProDucktion · 63,326
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Шулика
@kshulika · 52,845
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Семнадцатый номер
@deginc17 · 29,914
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Будни Бобана
@BudniBobana · 23,949
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
Эль Хугадор | Денис Алхазов
@alhasbro · 25,270
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Казанский Код
@deniskazansky · 24,075
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
Nobel
@nobel_arustamyan · 39,498
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q106644155 on Wikidata, read 20 September 2026
LabelAlexey Durnovo
DescriptionRussian journalist
X / Twitter@adyphobo

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вечерний Дурново” (@eveningdurnovo), 7,774 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eveningdurnovo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.