Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 86 days, net +1,012. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,621–25,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 13:17
25,789
-4
30 Oct 2026, 16:06
25,793
-16
29 Oct 2026, 15:28
25,809
-2
28 Oct 2026, 16:29
25,811
+16
27 Oct 2026, 17:36
25,795
+12
26 Oct 2026, 18:27
25,783
-22
25 Oct 2026, 21:50
25,805
-14
24 Oct 2026, 18:48
25,819
+20
23 Oct 2026, 16:54
25,799
+12
22 Oct 2026, 19:37
25,787
+39
21 Oct 2026, 15:28
25,748
-2
20 Oct 2026, 15:07
25,750
+7
19 Oct 2026, 16:21
25,743
-6
18 Oct 2026, 19:37
25,749
-1
17 Oct 2026, 21:38
25,750
+8
16 Oct 2026, 22:54
25,742
-11
16 Oct 2026, 01:40
25,753
-2
15 Oct 2026, 03:06
25,755
+27
13 Oct 2026, 21:51
25,728
+27
10 Oct 2026, 12:35
25,701
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.6%
avg views ÷ 25,789 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
125 (18 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
859,900
Reactions total
15,873
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Oct 2026, 06:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 26s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,651 reactions across 125 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26,810
69.4%
🔥
8,298
21.5%
🥴
1,147
2.97%
🤔
1,029
2.66%
💩
964
2.49%
🤮
403
1.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,651 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прямо сейчас в Окко отсматриваем студии ЛЧ — сами выступаем фокус-группой. Но у редакции все же есть некая деформация — тяжело оценить цельный разговор о футболе, когда ведешь его нон-стоп
Пишите честно, искренне, без прикрас и без оскорблений, что вам нравится в студиях, а что нет. Берём только студии ЛЧ-ЛЕ, программы в стороне
🤩 ЗАБЕРИ ОЧЕНЬ МОДНУЮ ФУТБОЛКУ!
Элитный байер БЕТСИТИ Сергей Игнашевич вернулся с Эль-Класико не с пустыми руками. Он привез лимитированную игровую футболку «Барсы».
Это коллаба с гениальным Tyler, The Creator и его брендом Golf Wang. Всего таких джерси выпущено 1899 штук. И одно из них может стать твоим!
Как? Да проще некуда!
▪️ Подпишись на БЕТСИТИ
▪️ Нажми на кнопку SWAG внизу поста
Итоги подведем 18 ноября. …
Свежий выпуск «Царя» уже на ютубе. Главная для меня часть — подробный разбор решений Моуринью в Класико
Еще мы не старались искать нового тренера для МЮ, это дело неблагодарное. Но спор Игнашевича и Мостового о праве игрока ляпнуть правду — ось всего выпуска
Любимая пора — стычки больших английских команд в раннем Кубке лиги. Прям с детства — сопкаст, осень, болгарские комментаторы, рубятся МЮ и «Челси», параллельно уставший Аршавин играет против «Рединга» Погребняка…
Такие матчи получаются веселыми — на носу тур и Лига чемпионов. Состав необходимо освежить, достав самые удивительные имена из второй команды
К тому же, «Челси» и «Ливерпуль» пока нестабильны по игре, и м…
Мбаппе нанес удар по Хавьеру Тебасу – такой, что отдыхает даже «Реал».
Так, кавалер Эстер Экспосито пришел на ток-шоу The Bridges и подставился – тем, что смеясь ответил на вопрос о мемах с диктатором: «Больше всего рассмешил тот, где меня изобразили в образе китайского диктатора. Я часто кидаю его друзьям».
Все посмеялись. К несчастью, кроме властей Китая.
Сидя на церемонии «ЗМ», Килиан терял одного китайского сп…
Отложенное сообщение на 01:30 27 октября
Очевидно, мы всей телеграмм-контент-развлекательной братией бились за интригу. Искали клики, юродствовали и нагоняли тумана — но этот Золотой мяч отдает былинной справедливостью, которой не было с Карима в 2022
Месси уже на периферии, одним великим ЧМом не побьешь отсутствие в Европе. Олисе подносит ярким звездам что в сборной, что в клубе. Его час славы еще впереди. Ламин н…
Мне кажется, у Мадрида любой игрок в любой момент сезона против любого соперника может сыграть на пределе. Нужно вовремя нажать на рычаг, и получишь мощность Порше, Мустанга, Мазератти и прочего элитного автопарка
Это одно из негласных правил при приеме на работу. А может и гласных: «Умеешь лезть из кожи вон? Принят»
Задача тренера — все смазать, нажать на рычажки, завести и подсказать, где крутой поворот. Моуринь…
Все-таки Жерар Мартин – потрясающий. Сочетает в себе качества Мальдини и Сендероса.
❤193🤮18🔥13🥴13🤔4
Signed Денис Алхазов
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @alhasbro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alhasbro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Казанский Код @deniskazansky · 24,297 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
«Футбольный клуб» Василия Уткина @QryaProDucktion · 63,323 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Okko Спорт @okkosport · 159,212 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Семнадцатый номер @deginc17 · 29,511 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе @cholo_football · 45,445 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Вадим Лукомский @lukomski · 45,197 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Портье Дрогба @portiedrogba · 35,113 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер @telingaterEPL · 27,028 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Картавый Футбол объединяет! @KFNik · 95,906 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ @CaptainFint · 41,686 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Шесть Элче | Ливерпуль @sixELCE · 22,484 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Английский Акцент @englishaccent · 38,930 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
Коммент.Шоу @comment_show · 55,838 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
La Saeta Rubia @LSR_RM · 33,243 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Будни Бобана @BudniBobana · 23,893 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
Здесь был Тимур | Тимур Журавель @timzhur · 26,496 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 September 2026
Витя Кравченко @vityakravchenko · 61,335 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Nobel @nobel_arustamyan · 39,182 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026
Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев @offearth · 48,693 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эль Хугадор | Денис Алхазов” (@alhasbro), 25,789 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alhasbro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.