29 measurements spanning 31 days, net -349. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,745–27,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 15:42
26,802
+4
4 Sept 2026, 05:39
26,798
-4
2 Sept 2026, 15:37
26,802
-10
1 Sept 2026, 15:32
26,812
-23
31 Aug 2026, 15:08
26,835
-46
30 Aug 2026, 12:13
26,881
-13
29 Aug 2026, 09:17
26,894
-11
28 Aug 2026, 07:13
26,905
-12
27 Aug 2026, 06:44
26,917
-15
26 Aug 2026, 04:03
26,932
+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:52
26,931
-12
24 Aug 2026, 05:35
26,943
-15
22 Aug 2026, 15:09
26,958
-20
21 Aug 2026, 03:23
26,978
-3
20 Aug 2026, 02:02
26,981
-10
19 Aug 2026, 01:24
26,991
-19
17 Aug 2026, 22:09
27,010
-32
16 Aug 2026, 22:25
27,042
-6
15 Aug 2026, 16:43
27,048
-25
14 Aug 2026, 05:59
27,073
first reading
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 26,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
101 (29 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
274,284
Reactions total
2,819
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 57s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,153 reactions across 95 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,048
25.2%
❤
874
21.0%
🔥
426
10.3%
😁
408
9.82%
💯
316
7.61%
🤡
250
6.02%
👏
247
5.95%
🤣
175
4.21%
👎
76
1.83%
🤔
50
1.20%
🥰
45
1.08%
💩
35
0.843%
🤩
29
0.698%
🏆
24
0.578%
🖕
22
0.53%
🤯
18
0.433%
🙈
15
0.361%
🤮
15
0.361%
❤🔥
13
0.313%
🕊
8
0.193%
18 further kinds
59
1.42%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
воспоминания о нашей с Алексеем Смертиным поездке по английским стадионам заново столкнули меня с загадочной историей Джима Риордана.
коммунист, фанат Советского союза, учёный и даже немного футболист. в видео его историю рассказывает дочь Татьяна, родившаяся как раз в Москве. якобы в советских приключениях её папы случился такой эпизод с игрой за московский Спартак. этот эпизод нигде в архивах Спартака не отображён…
посмотрел матч Бёрнли, где снова в старте вышел Дастан Сатпаев. как говорят английские комментаторы - Сатпэев.
заменили его в самом конце из-за травмы и уходил он под бурные аплодисменты. потому что все видели, как старательно молодой парень вгрызается в свой шанс: тащит мяч, ищет борьбу, бьёт по воротам. Дастану только 18 лет, а он уже такой крепкий, что умудряется выдерживать эту чемпионшиповскую силовую борьбу. п…
хочу перехватить повестку с упоминанием Алексея Смертина.
не судите по пяти секундам - вот тут сорок пять минут нашей с Алексеем поездки по четырём английским стадионам, которые были для него домашними.
там столько историй, они помогут вам по-другому взглянуть на Смертина.
Сила Лэмпарда, установки Моуриньо, овсянка Рэднаппа | Однажды в Англии | Алексей Смертин
https://youtu.be/HRXOdQgpL6w
с нашего Кубка переключился на Чемпионшип.
там сшибка недавних апловцев Вест Хэм - Вулфс. этот гол у ВХ забил какой-то молодой, вылетавший в прошлом сезоне вместе с Лестером в третью лигу. кроме этого парня, остальные играли в Премьер-лиге. и Боуэн, и Мавропанас, и Пабло - реально почти все остались. за очень дорого уехал в Тоттенхэм Фернандеш. но где гарантия, что к маю его прошлый и нынешний клубы не поменяются ли…
👉 ЭТО АНГЛИЯ
наш разговор с Филом и Гришей после второго тура АПЛ. вот некоторые наши темы.
🤩 - что для Челси изменит покупка вратаря Мартинеса.
🫣 - как забить гол после игры рукой и не быть за это наказанным.
🧐 - что для МЮ значит результативность Бруно Фернандеша.
😬 - как владение мячом стало проблемой для тех, кто им владеет.
🤓 - почему невозможно сдержать Арсенал.
🫢 - как Гласнер сделает Ноттингем снова ве…
весело представить, что бы было если б такой гол засчитали в РПЛ. но выясняется, что засчитали его по правилам.
неумышленная игра рукой в атаке, если далее забиваешь не ты, это легальный гол. ведь великий Магвайер жахнул мимо, а мяч срезал в ворота обороняющийся. то есть, если бы Магвайер забил сам, то гол бы отменили. вот так по-иезуитски в правилах написано. и надо как-то с этим жить.
впрочем, судьи всё же могли …
в английскую Лигу зашёл новый доминатор.
смотрите, какие роскошные цифры у Челси против Брайтона. Хаби Алонсо доказывает тезис, что владение для слабаков. представляете, что будет шестого сентября, когда в АПЛ случится дерби доминаторов - старой и новой формации.
мы всё это обсудим в нашем английском подкасте. а пока можете посмотреть наш выпуск по первому туру.
Рома Нагучев зачем-то позвал меня на селфи с хот-догом. так мы разминались перед матчем Спартак - Оренбург. а уже позже я заметил, что наши аккредитации РПЛ закреплены на ремешках Бундеслиги и ЛЧ.
это иронично, потому что в игре мы увидели, как европейский футбол Карседо приземлил на землю сермяжный рпловский клуб. Оренбург предложил Спартаку максимально некомфортный сценарий и таких матчей для Карседо будет ещё нем…
наконец-то это произошло. дисквалифицированный тренер больше не освобождается от интервью. так происходит, к примеру, в Англии. теперь и у нас.
помните, сколько раз мы слушали помощников Станковича и ассистентов того же Талалаева. и давайте честно, многие из вас думали: кто, чёрт возьми, это такие?! и вот теперь в медийном регламенте появился пункт: по нему клуб обязан обеспечить появление на интервью забаненного гл…
👍39❤8🤡4🔥3👏1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @timzhur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@timzhur edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
хорош или плох Дмитрий Воробьёв в играх за Краснодар?
Воробьёв 👍70%
Воробьёв 👎32%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
впереди у Мирлинда Даку 28 туров текущего сезона РПЛ.
сколько мячей он в них забьёт?
1-410%
5-833%
9-1235%
13-1715%
18-214%
больше 214%
ноль6%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
максимально упрощаем голосование в поисках ответа на сложный вопрос.
Мирлинд Даку - лучший вариант центрфорварда для Спартака?
да54%
нет47%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
«Футбольный клуб» Василия Уткина @QryaProDucktion · 63,348 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Сплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин @shhhnyakin · 38,657 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев @offearth · 48,373 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 August 2026
Коммент.Генич @kgenich · 52,885 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 24 August 2026
Nobel @nobel_arustamyan · 39,554 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026
Коммент.Шоу @comment_show · 55,273 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
Это футбол, брат! @etofootballbro · 66,430 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Алё, рэф! @aloref · 35,330 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 2 September 2026
Английский Акцент @englishaccent · 38,554 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу @teamrussia · 141,020 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Футбольные обзоры на Матч ТВ @matchtv_highlights · 64,415 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Витя Кравченко @vityakravchenko · 59,466 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Реальный Губер 🤘🏻 @RealGuberniev · 84,214 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа @pgorodnitskiy · 50,446 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Вадим Лукомский @lukomski · 44,501 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Okko Спорт @okkosport · 160,055 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Панк инсайд @punkinside · 39,315 Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Здесь был Тимур | Тимур Журавель” (@timzhur), 26,802 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timzhur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.