Channel
@cherdantsev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
6,424subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488427107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cherdantsev |
| Created | 9 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cherdantsev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 6,424 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 6,430 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 6,429 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 6,442 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 6,450 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 6,459 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 6,475 | -37 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 6,512 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 6,520 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 6,525 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 6,542 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 6,544 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 6,544 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
В новостных лентах вне зависимости от того, что подкидывает алгоритм в соцсетях, а просто в любых новостных агрегаторах количество сообщений об отставке Инфантино стоит наравне с другими общеполитическими новостями. А говорят футбол мало кого интересует)) Футбол это уже так давно далеко не просто про пинание мяча ногами))
Умер легендарный защитник и капитан Милана Франко Барези. Я застал его игру, благодаря каналу «Санкт-Петербург», который в середине 90-х показывал чемпионат Италии. Тогда в отличие, к сожалению, от нынешнего времени Серия А была лучшим и самым финансово благополучным турниром в Европе. Показ футбола такого уровня в России был настоящей сенсацией. В Италии играли супер звезды мирового футбола, но и итальянские игроки …
ЧМ-26 это турнирище. Трансляция финала, как доложил Жаров, установила рекорд на спортивном ТВ. Не удивительно, такой мундиаль. https://tass.ru/obschestvo/27938813
Вообще не понял, по какому принципу выдан Золотой мяч Родри. Он безусловно хороший футболист. Но можно назвать хотя бы один(!) матч, в котором Родри тащил свою команду? Выделялся? Спасал? Творил чудеса? Отдавал и забивал? 0 голов, 0 голевых. Испания такая сборная, что в ней каждый на своем месте и настолько налажена командная игра, что даже Ямаль не очень выделялся. Мбаппе набрал 14 баллов по гол плюс пас. Лучший б…
Как работает конспирологическая теория. Вернемся к фото, где Месси купает пятимесячного Ямаля. Итак. Фото сделано в 2007. Месси сейчас 39, тогда было 20. 39-20=19 Ямалю сейчас 19. Ямаль играет под номером 19. Фото было сделано в 2007. То есть, 19 лет назад. В 2007 Месси играл под номером 19. Финал чемпионата мира состоится в это воскресенье. 19 июля. Всем все ясно, я надеюсь?)
Ну вот и Линекер о том же: старая, добрая персоналка.
Ровно о том же самом я вчера спрашивал Шалимова: за 10 минут до конца игры, когда ты в шаге от финала ЧМ, может быть, стоило играть с Месси фактически персонально. Гари Нэвилл как раз и говорить, что по его мнению ошибка Тухеля в том, что он не дал О’Райли установку стоять рядом с Месси и не пускать его во фланг. Рой Кин категорически не согласен и говорит, что по игроку уже 20 лет никто не играет. А зря, по-моему.
5-месячный Ямаль и 20-летний Месси готовятся к финалу чемпионата мира. У этого фото уникальная история. Оно сделано в 2007 году для благотворительного календаря. Барселона и благотворительный фонд объявили лотерею для каталонских семей, чтобы выбрать ребенка для фотосессии. Семья Ямаля подала одну из многочисленных заявок. Победителя определил слепой жребий. Выиграла семья Ямаля. Что же, везет сильнейшим. В 1815 го…
Интересная таблица. Вмешательство VAR в среднем на 100 фолов участников 1/4. Красное против данной команда, синее - в ее пользу
Опрос для фанатов теории заговора. Чтобы полуфиналы были коммерчески топ.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вторая желтая Эмболо:
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Петер Шмейхель сейчас на канале Fox: какое глупое решение судьи показать Эмболо в ТАКОМ матче вторую желтую…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cherdantsev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опрос для фанатов теории заговора. Чтобы полуфиналы были коммерчески топ.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вторая желтая Эмболо:
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Georgy Cherdantsev |
|---|---|
| Description | Soviet journalist |
| X / Twitter | @cherdantsev |
| Official site | http://www.cherdantsev.ru/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Онжé Жорà” (@cherdantsev), 6,424 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherdantsev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.