Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГОНДУРАСА | СЕРГЕЙ ДУРАСОВ

Channel

ГОНДУРАСА | СЕРГЕЙ ДУРАСОВ

@GONDURASA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,362subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001785760051
TypeChannel
Username@GONDURASA
Created6 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GONDURASA

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,36210,45110,406.56 August 2026 — 10,448 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,448 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,439 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,438 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,434 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,433 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,430 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,424 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,421 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,427 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,423 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,448 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,440 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,451 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,449 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,441 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,440 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,432 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,427 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,429 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,431 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,430 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,424 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,417 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,391 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,384 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,378 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,372 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,362 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,349–10,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:5510,362-10
15 Sept 2026, 09:2210,372-6
13 Sept 2026, 16:4110,378-6
11 Sept 2026, 18:1510,384-7
9 Sept 2026, 07:0110,391-26
6 Sept 2026, 01:4210,417-7
3 Sept 2026, 18:5710,424-6
2 Sept 2026, 11:2610,430-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:4410,431+2
30 Aug 2026, 12:4410,429+2
29 Aug 2026, 10:0310,427-5
28 Aug 2026, 12:5610,432-8
27 Aug 2026, 10:5510,440-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:0610,441-8
25 Aug 2026, 13:2310,449-2
24 Aug 2026, 16:1710,451+11
23 Aug 2026, 00:1610,440-8
21 Aug 2026, 15:5210,448+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:0410,447+24
19 Aug 2026, 12:0110,423first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.1%
avg views ÷ 10,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,090
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held55 (20 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total106,860
Reactions total1,689
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,954 reactions across 55 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,00140.4%
🔥78715.9%
👍78215.8%
❤‍🔥72714.7%
😢1723.47%
🤝1172.36%
🤔1102.22%
💔871.76%
👏741.49%
😡691.39%
🤯280.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,954 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈2,010 views124 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Заканчивайте турнир немедленно!

🤣96❤‍🔥15🔥8👏3🤔2

28 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,030 views68 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вильярреал первая команда в истории топ-5 чемпионатов с тремя канадцами в заявке. Алавес шестьсот сорок вторая испанская команда с тремя Родригесами в заявке. Вот они сейчас зарубятся. Я прокомментирую. ⚽️«Алавес» - «Вильярреал»⚽️ 22:25. Матч футбол 2. Приходите🎙️

🤣46👍12❤‍🔥5🤝4😡1

26 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈2,380 views115 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Добро пожаловать в профессию!

🤣88😢17🔥5❤‍🔥3🤯2

25 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈3,420 views108 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите на статистику! Боги!

🤣81🔥21👍4❤‍🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,190 views66 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Скажите пожалуйста, а в чём Рубин Артиги лучше Рубина Рахимова? Хрен с ним, не лучше. Чем Рубин Артиги отличается от Рубина Рахимова? Старт ни о чём.

😢34🤣17👍9👏5😡1

24 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,090 views77 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Талалаев смотрит тебе в душу!

🤣59👍8🔥6❤‍🔥4

23 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈3,310 views83 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Старт Барселоны на фоне Эльче объективно оценить трудно. Флик не отходит от высокой линии, за что скорее всего опять вылетит из ЛЧ, но это потом. Сегодня же высочайший класс показали Жоан и Эрик Гарсии. Рафинья в отличной форме. Классно вошли Адейеми и Гордон. Ямаль к сезону пока не готов. С интересом жду связку Родри - Педри. Фермин умница.

👍61🔥12👏7❤‍🔥3

23 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈3,110 views116 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Эрлинг «Пальто» Холланд.

🤣104🔥7❤‍🔥5

23 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,950 views66 reactionsread 29 August 2026

У «Зенита» и махачкалинского «Динамо» одинаковое количество очков после пяти туров. Интересный сезон нас ждёт.

👍30🔥19🤣12❤‍🔥5

23 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,900 views90 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Очень нравится судья Инал Танашев! Нальчику большой привет.

❤‍🔥44👍30🤣7🤔4🔥3🤯2

23 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,960 views96 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Мойзес, Баринов, теперь вот Кривцов - слишком большие потери для РПЛ на старте. Всем скорейшего восстановления. UPD: Литвинов тоже. Жесть.

💔69😢17🤝5❤‍🔥4🤣1

23 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈2,810 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Кстати, лучшим игроком матча Спартак - Зенит тоже станет Ярослав Гладышев.

🤣68👍6🤯4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @GONDURASA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,230 voters approx.

Лучшая команда первого тура?

  1. Зенит25%
  2. Спартак45%
  3. Краснодар21%
  4. ЦСКА22%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Осипов Николай | Медиалига
@osipovnikolayofficial · 23,540
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев
@offearth · 48,343
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 August 2026
Здесь был Тимур | Тимур Журавель
@timzhur · 26,757
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 September 2026
Коммент.Генич
@kgenich · 52,825
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 24 August 2026
МЕЛБЕТ
@melbet_official_russia · 54,160
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Коммент.Шоу
@comment_show · 55,178
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
Матч! Медиафутбол
@match_media · 37,156
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
ФК «Рубин»
@fcrk1958 · 54,034
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 August 2026
Сплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин
@shhhnyakin · 38,567
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
FONBET
@fonbet_official · 246,240
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
ФК 10 || ФК Десять || FC 10
@fc10fc10 · 25,463
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Футбольные обзоры на Матч ТВ
@matchtv_highlights · 64,104
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Это футбол, брат!
@etofootballbro · 66,255
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГОНДУРАСА | СЕРГЕЙ ДУРАСОВ” (@GONDURASA), 10,362 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GONDURASA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.