Канал Михаила Борзыкина о российском футболе. По вопросам сотрудничества - @borzykinmikhail.
https://t.me/borzykin2 - личный канал.
Роскомнадзор: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a4771b24c8ba6dca914711
2bj7ujlfp
Created
10 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -466. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,361–117,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:18
117,022
-18
16 Sept 2026, 13:15
117,040
+19
14 Sept 2026, 21:02
117,021
-21
13 Sept 2026, 05:56
117,042
+28
11 Sept 2026, 07:58
117,014
-37
8 Sept 2026, 13:58
117,051
+76
5 Sept 2026, 06:38
116,975
-72
3 Sept 2026, 14:22
117,047
+247
2 Sept 2026, 06:08
116,800
+87
1 Sept 2026, 04:26
116,713
+91
31 Aug 2026, 05:07
116,622
+13
30 Aug 2026, 08:05
116,609
+52
29 Aug 2026, 07:42
116,557
+36
28 Aug 2026, 10:18
116,521
-177
27 Aug 2026, 07:04
116,698
+18
26 Aug 2026, 08:03
116,680
+18
25 Aug 2026, 06:33
116,662
-50
24 Aug 2026, 04:16
116,712
-156
22 Aug 2026, 11:57
116,868
-110
20 Aug 2026, 23:02
116,978
first reading
Engagement
283 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 117,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,800
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 283 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
283 (2 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
5,029,200
Reactions total
103,858
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 23:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,480
Videos
≈1,480
Links
≈8,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25m 15s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
183,162 reactions across 265 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
89,423
48.8%
🤣
50,395
27.5%
👏
19,977
10.9%
🔥
11,051
6.03%
🤬
6,272
3.42%
👎
4,579
2.50%
😢
1,465
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 283 of the 283 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192,870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
278
across the posts below
Posts paid on
132
of 283 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
82
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mborzykin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 283 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.707%
2 of 283 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
30,900
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
32,700
over 281 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHxjQty
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
2W5zFJmi8Au
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
«Матч ТВ» извинился перед «Крыльями Советов» за слова Губерниева. Сам одиозный ведущий и причина многих сломанных кнопок VOL на телевизионных пультах извиняться не стал: «Что я могу сказать? Футбольный бог нам всем судья. Как говорится, бог не выдаст, свинья не съест».
Напомню, месяц назад Губерниев в одном из эфиров подменял Жору Ч, погнавшегося за новыми инсайдами, и по ходу обзора кубкового матча «Крылья Советов»…
Как же приятно от одной мысли, что даже в такое беспокойное внешнеполитическое время заботливое государство находит минутку, чтобы сделать досуг любимого гражданина еще более безопасным.
● Правила канала ● Подпишись на Фабрику Футбола
Дядя Гена:
– Слуцкий с удовольствием хотел бы пойти в российские команды. Думаю, он с удовольствием возглавил бы «Зенит». Тем более, что у него друг – бывший президент футбольного клуба «Крылья Советов» Герман Ткаченко. Там связи… Но «Зенит» будет сам решать, кто будет тренером работать.
Пошел прогрев. Слуцкий – первая фамилия, которая всплывет в памяти газпод в момент расставания с Семаком. Но есть мнение, что Лео…
Ужасно надоело читать и писать о Fan ID. В сущности, какая вам разница, когда он появится в Кубке? С 1 октября? С 10 ноября? С 31 декабря? Это будет и это - наша реальность.
Возможно, и не было бы распространения Fan ID, но людей, живущих по принципу "а чо такова", с каждой секундой все больше. Люди забили стадионы. Какой вывод сделали инициаторы?
И вообще Fan ID уже утратил актуальность. На вашем месте я бы начина…
Константин Генич:
– Даку помогает забивать Угальде. Этого не было, когда пришел Ливай Гарсия. Мы видим, какая «химия» между ними образовалась, – сказал он.
[Ругаюсь матом] Да откуда это пошло? В этом сезоне Угальде забил шесть мячей с учетом Кубка. Находясь на поле вместе с Даку – один мяч. Сколько живу – столько удивляюсь: стоит кому-то что-то ляпнуть – подхватывают другие, даже не напрягая ум.
А в комментах сейч…
Первая тренерская отставка в РПЛ прогремела только после девятого тура. Это объяснимо тем, что, во-первых, боссы клубов стали более терпеливы, во-вторых, Сергей Ташуев был занят в «Енисее».
Провожаем главного тренера «Родины» Хуана Диаса, который навсегда вошел в историю тем, что однажды расстроил достопочтенного Алексея Борисыча, а всем нам подарил светлое воскресенье.
Надеюсь, с новым тренером у «Родины» получитс…
Пауза на сборную выжигает всю жизнь. Четвертый день пошел – тихо как на гостевом секторе «Сочи». Никто никого стульями не лупит, хоумвидео не снимает, бухим за руль не садится. Совсем измельчал наш футбол, даже обсудить нечего.
● Правила канала ● Подпишись на Фабрику Футбола
Артем Дзюба – о продолжении карьеры:
– Не знаю, честно. Прострация. 50 на 50. На самом деле, скорее нет, чем да. Ну, ради чего? Лиги чемпионов нет. Ради чего? Если б позвала какая-то сильная команда – я понимаю, что уже в своем возрасте должен где-то помогать в раздевалке, на замену выходить – это одна история. А идти и ковыряться где-то в командах «таких» – смысл? – сказал он.
За месяц рассуждения Дзюбы эволюциони…
Накануне «Галатасарай» крупно влетел «Трабзонспору» (0:4). Леха Батраков вышел на поле только на 68-й минуте, когда его команда уже горела 0:3. Не спас. Но мне приятно думать, что был близок.
В турецкой буйной палате полыхают пятые точки. Говоря о Батракове, местные легенды и журналисты критикуют тренера, который, по их мнению, неправильно использует Леху, выпуская на позиции восьмерки.
Никто в здравом уме, понятно…
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если вы до сих пор думали, что в футболе не бывает чудес, то вот вам доказательство. После девяти туров Максименко возглавляет рейтинг вратарей (процент отбитых ударов). Вот что критика животворящая делает!
Сезон-23/24: 1. Сафонов (79%), 2. Беленов (77%), 3. Максименко (77%).
Сезон-24/25: 1. Латышонок (84%), 2. Агкацев (78%), 3. Максименко (71%).
Сезон-25/26: 1. Бориско (85%), 2. Адамов (82%), 3. Тороп (76%).
● Пра…
🤣545👍186👏43🔥26👎13
Showing the 12 most recent of 283 posts we hold for @mborzykin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@mborzykin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 September 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов @karpinside · 143,490#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
У Кузьмича|"Спартак" @ykuzmicha · 27,626 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Фабрика Спартака @fabrikaspartaka · 33,650 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Казанский Код @deniskazansky · 24,075 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
Дай ударитЬ @daiudarit · 45,025 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 27 August 2026
🔴⚪️КБ ТЕЛЕГА | Никитин @spartakoz · 56,089 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
«Футбольный клуб» Василия Уткина @QryaProDucktion · 63,326 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Игорь Акинфеев #35 @igor_akinfeev35 · 54,925 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Спартак Москва | Spartak Moscow @tg_spartak · 29,260 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Мутко против @offsider · 65,502 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
РПЛ | Российская Премьер-Лига @rpl_news · 54,931 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Это футбол, брат! @etofootballbro · 66,255 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Ultras Action @ultras_action · 31,774 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
ФК «Спартак-Москва» @fcsmtg · 270,816 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
First&Red @firstandred · 28,317 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
ФК «Факел» Воронеж @pfcfakel · 39,815 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
OFNEWS / Околоспортивные Новости @ofnews · 85,545 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов @karpinside · 143,490 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
РФС @rfsruofficial · 45,892 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 27 August 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа @pgorodnitskiy · 50,554 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Футбольные обзоры на Матч ТВ @matchtv_highlights · 64,104 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
ФК Спартак | Spartak @fc_spartakm · 21,815 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
Эль спортико @trtrrtryy · 40,598 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Transfermarkt Official @transfermarktru · 33,656 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 September 2026
Коммент.Шоу @comment_show · 55,178 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 81 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фабрика Футбола” (@mborzykin), 117,022 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mborzykin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.