Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Спартак Шоу

Channel

Спартак Шоу

@showspartak

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,199subscribers

+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002186297334
TypeChannel
Username@showspartak
DescriptionПотенциально культовое шоу о Спартаке ВКонтакте: https://vkvideo.ru/@spartakshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@spartakshow
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/showspartak

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0286,2256,126.56 August 2026 — 6,046 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,046 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,037 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,034 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,028 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,044 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,053 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,060 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,051 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,036 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,212 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,189 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,158 subscribers24 September 2026 — 6,153 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,176 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,225 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,219 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,216 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,222 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,218 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,211 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,199 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,201 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,199 subscribers6,1996 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,998–6,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 13:556,199-2
1 Nov 2026, 07:566,201+2
28 Oct 2026, 22:556,199-12
25 Oct 2026, 23:316,211-7
23 Oct 2026, 06:086,218-4
20 Oct 2026, 01:406,222+6
17 Oct 2026, 10:556,216-3
14 Oct 2026, 18:506,219-6
11 Oct 2026, 08:556,225+49
4 Oct 2026, 16:596,176+23
24 Sept 2026, 20:586,153-5
16 Sept 2026, 16:586,158-31
12 Sept 2026, 11:176,189-23
7 Sept 2026, 21:376,212+176
2 Sept 2026, 12:466,036-15
30 Aug 2026, 16:546,051-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:096,060+7
25 Aug 2026, 03:586,053+9
21 Aug 2026, 14:356,044+16
18 Aug 2026, 04:536,028first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 6,199 subscribers
Avg views / post
996
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held92 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total31,870
Reactions total1,227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈847
Links
≈3,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 16s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,617 reactions across 80 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤83732.0%
custom 536637271792052921061223.4%
🔥2328.87%
😁1164.43%
👍1114.24%
custom 54429991177793470471023.90%
💯833.17%
custom 5359621132410445092632.41%
custom 5327859587263532155542.06%
🏆501.91%
custom 5458393453094281883481.83%
custom 5327894492462740270461.76%
👎431.64%
👏411.57%
custom 5359377655009417251371.41%
❤‍🔥271.03%
😢170.65%
🤝170.65%
🥴170.65%
🍾150.573%
7 further kinds491.87%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,901 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (59.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC80 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🏆 Лучший соперник для нас? 📊 В 6 матчах против «Акрона» у «Спартака» 4 победы, 1 ничья и 1 поражение 🔙 Единственный раз тольяттинцы были сильнее красно-белых в полуфинале Пути регионов Кубка России в сезоне 2022/23 👀 А вничью команды сыграли в 3-м туре прошлого сезона. Тогда счёт был 1:1, а оба гола были забиты после 90-й минуты 🧮 Кстати, во встречах этих команд в среднем забивается больше 4 голов за матч ✍️ В в…

custom 53663727179205292102❤1🏆1

6 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,450 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Жедсону некомфортно в обороне! 💬 Португалец разоткровенничался в интервью клубной пресс-службе и признался, что ему не по душе позиция правого защитника: Я сразу сказал Карседо, что лично мне эта позиция не по душе, но я сделаю всё ради команды. Выполню всё, что потребуется. Тактика, персональные задачи, выхожу я вообще на поле или нет — всё это неважно. Имеет значение только конечный результат 🤔 Какое, на ваш в…

custom 536637271792052921030❤7🏆2

6 Nov 2026, 13:15 UTC594 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💊3👀2

6 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC616 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯5🔥5❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC684 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 536637271792052921012❤1🏆1🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC756 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💬 Нас ждёт непростой матч! 😄 Хуан Карседо по традиции раздал комплиментов сопернику перед очной встречей, а заодно рассказал о состоянии своих травмированных футболистов 🧐 Какой у вас настрой на «Акрон»? ❤️ Спартак Шоу

custom 536637271792052921020💯7❤2🏆1

5 Nov 2026, 18:30 UTC946 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💥 Комбаров и Глушаков против Роналду! 📊 Сегодня Криштиану объявил о завершении карьеры в сборной. С Россией португалец сыграл 6 матчей: 4 победы (среди них - легендарные 7:1), 1 ничья и 1 поражение 4️⃣ Но главное, что за это время Роналду посчастливилось встретиться на поле с четырьмя действующими на тот момент спартаковцами: Глушаковым, Джикией, Самедовым и Дмитрием Комбаровым! 👋 Как думаете, вовремя уходит эпоха…

custom 536637271792052921018😁9❤5🏆1

5 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC947 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🔝 Великая французская ремонтада «Спартака»! 🔙 40 лет назад красно-белые принимали «Тулузу» в ответном матче 1/16 финала Кубка УЕФА. В первой встрече французы были сильнее — 3:1, а матч в «Лужниках» начали с забитого гола… Но даже после такой, казалось бы, безнадёги «Спартак» включился и забил 5 мячей. С общим счётом 6:4 мы прошли дальше! 🚪 Правда, в 1/8 красно-белые уступили австрийскому «Сваровски-Тиролю» по сумм…

❤22custom 536637271792052921012👍5😢3🏆1

5 Nov 2026, 10:24 UTC968 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

😮‍💨 Попался фартовый рэф? 📊 Начиная с прошлого сезона, «Спартак» провёл 7 матчей с Рафаэлем Шафеевым, из которых победил в 6-ти и ещё однажды сыграл вничью 🔙 В текущем чемпионате Шафеев судил нас в 1-м туре против «Родины». Тогда красно-белые разгромили новичков РПЛ (3:0), а арбитр отменил назначенный пенальти в наши ворота после просмотра ВАР 🤔 За судейство спокойны? ❤️ Спартак Шоу

custom 536637271792052921022❤8👍4🏆1

5 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,030 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💯 Доброе патриотическое от Кристофера Ву! 😗 Наш камерунский защитник уверен, что московское метро чище и лучше парижского 🚇 Кстати, год назад Крис с другими игроками кб повторил путешествие спартаковцев в подземке 20-летней давности ❤️ Спартак Шоу

custom 536637271792052921030❤11🔥6🏆1💯1🤝1🥴1

4 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,140 views53 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Лучшая атака в лиге — у «Спартака»? 😵 По данным РУСТАТ, красно-белые создали 112 голевых моментов в этом сезоне РПЛ. Для сравнения: остальные команды чемпионата не наработали даже на 100 📊 Вот так выглядит топ-5 по этому показателю: 1. 🔴 Спартак — 112 2. ⚓️ Зенит — 99 3. 🔷 Крылья Советов — 88 4. 👮‍♂️ Динамо — 83 5. 🐂 Краснодар — 82 👀 При этом питерцы забили 30, а мы всего 25 ❤️ Спартак Шоу

custom 536637271792052921038❤11🏆3🫡1

4 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,070 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🛡 Кто самый сильный защитник РПЛ? 💭 Маркиньос в новом выпуске «Царского подкаста» составил свой оборонительный топ-3 чемпионата: Нино — очень опытный футболист, с ним невероятно трудно соперничать. Судя по тренировкам, Джику непросто пройти. Он встречает очень жёстко. Обычно я играю против правых защитников, а центральные защитники только подстраховывают — с ними редко удаётся выйти один на один. Среди крайних защит…

custom 536637271792052921015❤7🏆3🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @showspartak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

😤 Пора выпускать Даку?

  1. ✔️ Да, пусть сделает разницу91%
  2. ❌ Нет, дайте время Угальде12%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Спартак Шоу” (@showspartak), 6,199 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/showspartak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.