Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -565. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,258–13,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:20
12,348
-19
16 Sept 2026, 23:20
12,367
-39
15 Sept 2026, 03:00
12,406
-2
13 Sept 2026, 15:20
12,408
+1
11 Sept 2026, 17:20
12,407
-28
9 Sept 2026, 03:37
12,435
+20
5 Sept 2026, 20:16
12,415
-9
3 Sept 2026, 19:17
12,424
-10
2 Sept 2026, 10:16
12,434
-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:43
12,444
-15
31 Aug 2026, 15:16
12,459
-14
30 Aug 2026, 15:36
12,473
-15
29 Aug 2026, 12:36
12,488
-57
28 Aug 2026, 12:44
12,545
-12
27 Aug 2026, 09:14
12,557
-7
26 Aug 2026, 06:32
12,564
-19
25 Aug 2026, 07:12
12,583
+2
24 Aug 2026, 06:35
12,581
-39
22 Aug 2026, 17:24
12,620
-29
21 Aug 2026, 07:15
12,649
first reading
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 12,348 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,260
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
115 (28 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
262,990
Reactions total
10,669
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,327 reactions across 111 posts, in 81 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
6,772
22.3%
custom 5449759615346548186
2,715
8.95%
custom 5399874910233336042
2,242
7.39%
🤡
2,000
6.59%
👍
1,562
5.15%
😢
1,324
4.37%
custom 5425026625265752330
1,209
3.99%
custom 5433959014780132957
1,202
3.96%
😱
996
3.28%
custom 5294049355601292129
685
2.26%
custom 5382088114925774326
649
2.14%
custom 5381956658861743745
594
1.96%
👎
572
1.89%
🔥
571
1.88%
🤬
507
1.67%
custom 5422364561586019757
390
1.29%
🤯
377
1.24%
custom 5370824412868122831
372
1.23%
custom 5422848428306620596
371
1.22%
custom 5456437499217844824
348
1.15%
61 further kinds
4,869
16.1%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 115 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sbgtelega. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 115 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❗Бубнов назвал Кондакова «выкормышем» и «подлецом»: 70-летний экс-защитник «Спартака» дважды оскорбил 18-летнего футболиста «Зенита» в прямом эфире за то, что тот заработал пенальти в концовке матча с «Факелом»
💙 Подписаться на СБГ ТЕЛЕГУ
❗«Матч ТВ» принёс извинения телезрителям за жест Смертина, который попал в трансляцию встречи «Зенита» с «Динамо»: в начале игры телеканал показал вип-ложу на «Газпром Арене», где сидел экс-футболист сборной России – в этот момент он продемонстрировал неприличный жест сидевшей рядом женщине. Как выяснилось позднее, Смертин «процитировал» Евсеева после победы над сборной Уэльса: генпродюсер «Матч ТВ» Тащин извинился и…
⚡ Мостовой не попал в заявку «Зенита» на кубковый матч с махачкалинским «Динамо»: 28-летний вингер пропускает вторую игру подряд и с высокой долей вероятности больше не появится на поле в форме сине-бело-голубых. В ближайшее время Мостовой должен завершить переход в «Локомотив» на правах аренды до лета 2027 года, по окончании которой истечёт его контракт с «Зенитом»
💙 Подписаться на СБГ ТЕЛЕГУ
❗Сегодняшний матч «Зенита» в Кубке России может стать последним без Fan ID: ранее телеграм-каналы сообщали о возможном введении «паспорта болельщика» на кубковых играх уже с 1 октября 2026 года. Сегодня «Зенит» считается явным фаворитом: WINLINE предлагает коэффициент 1.96 на то, что сине-бело-голубые забьют 2-3 гола, а всем новым пользователям дарит приветственный бонус – до 10 000 ₽
⚽️ Бесплатные трансляции матчей…
⚡ «Зенит» предложил Головину контракт до лета 2031 года: петербургский клуб предлагает 30-летнему полузащитнику «Монако» заключить соглашение по схеме «4+1». Стороны пока что не пришли к компромиссу по финансовым условиям контракта, но вероятность трансфера в «Зенит» сохраняется. «Монако» нуждается в деньгах и готово продать Головина за 15 млн евро — «РБ Спорт»
💙 Подписаться на СБГ ТЕЛЕГУ
⚡ Мостовой не стал продлевать контракт с «Зенитом» и отказался от половины зарплаты: 28-летний вингер сине-бело-голубых переходит в «Локомотив» на правах аренды, а его контракт с петербуржцами истечёт летом 2027 года и не будет продлён. В «Зените» Мостовой зарабатывал 18 млн рублей в месяц: Андрей отказался от 9 млн рублей, «чтобы играть» за «Локо», где ему будут платить в два раза меньше — Иван Карпов
💙 Подписаться…
⚡️🚨 Мостовой уходит в «Локомотив» и продлевает контракт с «Зенитом» на год: сделка будет полностью завершена в ближайшие дни, а зарплату во время аренды клубы поделят пополам. Мостовой выступал за «Зенит» с 2020 года: 28-летний вингер провёл 209 матчей за клуб, набрал «42+23» и выиграл 12 трофеев – пять чемпионатов России, шесть Суперкубков страны и один Кубок. Мостовой уже играл за молодёжку «Локо»: прямо сейчас «же…
❗«Зенит» отказался отдавать Мостового в «Динамо», потому что бело-голубые не продали Тюкавина: московский клуб уже договорился с 28-летним вингером о переходе, но руководство сине-бело-голубых заблокировало сделку из-за позиции «Динамо» по Тюкавину. Также «Зенит» отказался отпускать Мостового в «Краснодар», поскольку это прямой конкурент в борьбе за чемпионство: в итоге Андрей может продолжить карьеру в «Локо», заним…
⚡ «Рома» предложила 43 млн евро за Луиса Энрике: римляне отправили «Зениту» уже второй официальный оффер на 38+5 млн евро за 25-летнего вингера сборной Бразилии. В случае завершения сделки Энрике станет самым дорогим трансфером в истории «Ромы» и одной из самых дорогих продаж в истории «Зенита» — ESPN
💙 Подписаться на СБГ ТЕЛЕГУ
⚡ Суперкомпьютер Opta оценивает вероятность чемпионства «Зенита» всего в 25,2%: это один из самых низких показателей за всё время подобных расчётов. По итогам шести туров РПЛ «Зенит» отстаёт от лидирующего «Краснодара» на 6 очков: вероятность чемпионства «быков» – 57,8%
💙 Подписаться на СБГ ТЕЛЕГУ
🤯110custom 542236456158601975762😁13😢12👍3🤡1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @sbgtelega. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sbgtelega edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
#вЗените @vzenite12 · 22,799 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Зимин @footballDiZzz · 24,250 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Кафешка @zenit_cafe · 25,511 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит» @fczenit · 195,858 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
DENZELLOFFICIAL @denzellofficial · 36,919 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Первый спорт @pervsport · 91,549 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 August 2026
WINLINE @winline · 267,564 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Спорт-Экспресс | Sport-Express @sportexpress · 102,829 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
РПЛ | Российская Премьер-Лига @rpl_news · 54,931 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
ФК «Сочи» @Sochipfc · 23,397 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 18 September 2026
Metaratings @Metaratings · 28,922 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СБГ ТЕЛЕГА” (@sbgtelega), 12,348 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbgtelega.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.