Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Черновик | Гоша Чернов

Channel

Черновик | Гоша Чернов

@chernovgo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,204subscribers

-1,485 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562693301
TypeChannel
Username@chernovgo
Description🗞 Канал шефа отдела международного футбола «СЭ» о «Зените», РПЛ и не только. 👉🏼 MAX: https://max.ru/chernovgo 📞 Связь: @G0sha 📝 Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6890c2285476a73668a63e39
Created14 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chernovgo

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,20118,03317,1176 August 2026 — 17,689 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,689 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,626 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,610 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,621 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,623 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,606 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,590 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,606 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,604 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,635 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,682 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,929 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,973 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,014 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,994 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,009 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,033 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,988 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,956 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,972 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,966 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,952 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,875 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,859 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,845 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,828 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,336 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,304 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,285 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,282 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,256 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,207 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,285 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,302 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,310 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,309 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,295 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,290 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,292 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,291 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,288 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,287 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,280 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,269 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,260 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,254 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,247 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,248 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,243 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,222 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,228 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,227 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,207 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,201 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,204 subscribers16,2046 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -1,485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,926–18,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:2616,204+3
3 Nov 2026, 06:4916,201-6
2 Nov 2026, 04:4116,207-20
1 Nov 2026, 03:1616,227-1
31 Oct 2026, 02:3816,228+6
30 Oct 2026, 05:1716,222-21
29 Oct 2026, 07:1816,243-5
27 Oct 2026, 06:3616,248+1
26 Oct 2026, 05:0816,247-7
25 Oct 2026, 05:3516,254-6
24 Oct 2026, 01:5616,260-9
23 Oct 2026, 01:3816,269-11
21 Oct 2026, 22:0716,280-7
20 Oct 2026, 13:5116,287-1
19 Oct 2026, 11:5816,288-3
18 Oct 2026, 14:2016,291-1
17 Oct 2026, 10:5516,292+2
16 Oct 2026, 09:3716,290-5
15 Oct 2026, 09:0616,295-14
14 Oct 2026, 11:1916,309first reading

Engagement

187 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 16,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,670
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 187 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held187 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total135,970
Reactions total2,907
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈445
Links
≈1,950

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,339 reactions across 187 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,15433.6%
👍3,88121.2%
😁1,6799.16%
🔥1,0815.89%
🤣1,0705.83%
👎4402.40%
💯3992.18%
😭3662.00%
😢3081.68%
🤡3001.64%
❤‍🔥2451.34%
👻2321.27%
🤯2311.26%
🤬2221.21%
🤮2201.20%
🤷‍♂1460.796%
😱1240.676%
custom 52764909237048661001130.616%
💘1110.605%
🥴1030.562%
31 further kinds9144.98%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 187 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 187 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chernovgo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 187 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,290 views84 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Гениально. То есть «Локомотив» все-таки решил уволить Галактионова, но он все равно будет руководить им в матче с «Рубином». Зачем? Ради чего? Чтобы команда все-таки рухнула в зону вылета? Тогда вопросов нет.

👍43😁30❤7🤡4

3 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC≈5,090 views182 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Генерал Алексей Батраков! Теперь только так. Это просто чудо, что он творит.

❤139🔥25😁10👍3🤡2👎1🥰1custom 53843504459992670751

3 Nov 2026, 13:40 UTC≈5,450 views172 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Если всё было действительно так, как описывает Сергей Егоров, то Карпин сам спровоцировал Глушенкова, и отказ Максима объясним. Был вечер вторника, очередной матч без мотивации. А уже в субботу «Зенит» ждала одна из самых важных игр сезона — против «Краснодара» в гостях. Здесь приоритеты не просто очевидны — их даже проговаривать глупо. Конечно, Максим не собирался тратить энергию и эмоции перед ключевым матчем. И …

❤106👍35custom 538435044599926707531

3 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC≈5,340 views98 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Карпин адекватно и спокойно объяснил, что произошло с Глушенковым. Причина — нежелание играть за сборную. Дальше он даже признает, что Максим — лучший игрок чемпионата. То есть обида или что-то подобное не считывается. Глушенков и Карпин последовательны — все помнят 2024-й, когда Макс тоже блистал, но не попадал в сборную. Тогда Макс произнес знаменитую фразу: «Мне лучше с Венделом, Клаудиньо, Барриосом и Кассьеррой…

❤64👍18custom 538435044599926707514👌2

2 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC≈5,520 views212 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ура, во втором тайме не было пенальти – и мы могли спокойно говорить о футболе. Ну и команда забила два хороших гола с игры. Честно говоря, второй тайм понравился даже больше, потому что «Зенит» показал свою гибкость. У «Крыльев» владение 58% и больше ударов, а «Зенит» вообще без напряга вторым номером укатал соперника. Какие-то подходики и фланговые навесы у Самары были, но в целом это выглядело жалко. Уверенная п…

❤128custom 527649092370486610058👍21🔥2🤮2❤‍🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,510 views66 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Не очень понимаю, как Горшков может быть лучшим игроком «Крыльев» по оценкам. Совсем же перегорел.

🤷‍♂58❤6👍2

2 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC≈5,410 views159 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Как же спрогрессировал Карпукас. Это точно самый неожиданный прорыв в команде, а то и во всей лиге в этом сезоне. Потому что даже в «Локомотиве» его использовали не совсем в этой роли. Венделу можно уже даже и паспорт РФ не оформлять – это не вернет его в основу.

👍110❤29💯15🔥5

2 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC≈5,530 views59 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Достаточно вялая игра от «Зенита». Думаю, что это связано со счетом. Из-за него трудно оценить истинный уровень и форму команды. Честно говоря, ничего хорошего в этом нет, особенно с репутационной точки зрения. Вон, даже статистики уже ржут: впервые в истории пять пенальти подряд в двух таймах подряд. Вот это детаааль! Надо все-таки забивать с игры и доказывать, что все эти многочисленные пенальти – справедливое сл…

❤36🥴13💯6🔥3👍1

2 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,530 views141 reactionsread 4 November 2026

У «Зенита» к 30-й минуте 6 ударов. 5 из них: • Удар Джона Джона – рука Костанцы • Незабитый пенальти Соболева • Добивание Глушенкова в штангу • Удар Соболева – рука Чернова • Забитый пенальти Соболева

❤73😁50🔥15👍2👎1

2 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈5,480 views83 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Рисковал Соболев. В момент его удара я вспомнил про великого Мартина Палермо, который не забил три пенальти за матч. Пока без рекордов.

😁68❤12👍2🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC≈5,540 views97 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Все-таки большой вопрос, почему Глушенков не бьет пенальти на постоянной основе. В прошлом матче мы видели, что он может делать это великолепно.

💯85❤10👍1🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈5,600 views71 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Саламыч, он же Приветович — всё. Не могу сказать, что за эти почти полтора года «Ахмат» сильно спрогрессировал. Но и в зоне вылета он сейчас находится не по игре. С одной стороны, не самая очевидная отставка. С другой, логика есть. Вопрос в том, кто вместо Черчесова. Если Ролан Гусев, то это, скажем так, очень своеобразно.

❤49😁16👍5😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @chernovgo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@chernovgo edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 24,557
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Рашен Football
@rashen_football · 20,131
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
ФК Зенит | Zenit fans
@zenitfans · 20,910
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,627
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,641
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Спорт-Экспресс | Sport-Express
@sportexpress · 101,324
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 181,511
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Журнал Футбол
@sovsportru · 18,998
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
Бесплатный Питер | Санкт-Петербург
@piter_free78 · 19,725
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
Газпромбанк
@gazprombank · 88,469
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
DENZELLOFFICIAL
@denzellofficial · 36,817
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,460
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу
@teamrussia · 145,021
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Metaratings
@Metaratings · 28,154
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
АЗС «Газпромнефть»
@gpnbonus · 48,931
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 247,707
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
WINLINE
@winline · 279,794
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске
@sportonkp · 144,354
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Советский спорт
@sovsport · 42,497
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Игорь Акинфеев #35
@igor_akinfeev35 · 54,524
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 195,043
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Черновик | Гоша Чернов” (@chernovgo), 16,204 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chernovgo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.