Пишем про «Ливерпуль» и не только. Предвзято и непрофессионально, зато с душой.
🤝 Вопросы и предложения: в ЛС канала
🖤 Закрытый канал Шесть Элче: https://clck.su/Six-Elce
Created
31 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 59 days, net +1,297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,521–22,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 12:17
22,013
+96
26 Sept 2026, 04:00
21,917
+86
19 Sept 2026, 11:40
21,831
+2
16 Sept 2026, 23:57
21,829
+40
13 Sept 2026, 11:21
21,789
+38
11 Sept 2026, 13:00
21,751
+4
8 Sept 2026, 17:20
21,747
-43
5 Sept 2026, 13:02
21,790
+171
3 Sept 2026, 13:54
21,619
+16
2 Sept 2026, 10:17
21,603
+20
1 Sept 2026, 08:06
21,583
-35
31 Aug 2026, 06:55
21,618
+18
30 Aug 2026, 09:28
21,600
+78
29 Aug 2026, 06:44
21,522
+68
28 Aug 2026, 06:27
21,454
+17
27 Aug 2026, 08:18
21,437
+42
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
21,395
+10
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
21,385
+101
24 Aug 2026, 06:42
21,284
+182
22 Aug 2026, 13:52
21,102
first reading
Engagement
713 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.6%
avg views ÷ 22,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,940
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 713 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
713 (5 August 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
661,770
Reactions total
19,497
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Oct 2026, 14:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,500
Videos
≈3,970
Links
≈7,510
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
33m 35s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137,491 reactions across 702 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
74,475
54.2%
custom 5278631466685723657
32,261
23.5%
🫡
13,455
9.79%
💔
9,920
7.22%
custom 5391147480853262855
2,364
1.72%
custom 5382351147312902689
2,359
1.72%
custom 5461118459519732177
1,624
1.18%
custom 5224441409045556428
1,033
0.751%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 713 of the 713 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139,563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 713 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 713 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sixELCE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 713 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дела трансферные от Фабрицио Романо:
🛑 Об Эндрике
«Ливерпуль» был заинтересован в бразильце, но до официального предложения дело так и не дошло. При этом клуб даже рассматривал возможность в какой-то момент приобрести Эндрика на постоянной основе.
Но «Реал» закрыл дверь как для аренды, так и для полноценного трансфера. Подступиться к игроку было невозможно».
🛑 Об Алексе Скотте
«Челси» летом дважды предпринимал п…
Guardian Sport обнародовал ежегодный топ-20 Next Gen АПЛ, где представлены лучшие игроки академий каждого из клубов чемпионата. В этом году от «Ливерпуля» – Джош Эйб.
В прошлые годы «Ливерпуль» был представлен следующими игроками:
🛑 Адам Филлипс (2014);
🛑 Трент Александер-Арнольд (2015);
🛑 Бен Вудберн (2016);
🛑 Кёртис Джонс (2017);
🛑 Нейл Бруквелл (2018) – в 2020 году ушёл в «Ньюкасл»;
🛑 Лейтон Стюарт (2019) – выше…
Вёрдж сегодня в сотый раз вышел на поле за сборную Нидерландов. Это четвёртый матч кэпа за 11 дней. В трёх предыдущих он сыграл по 90 минут.
Вирц, кстати, тоже вывел сегодня свою сборную с капитанской повязкой.
Доминик Собослай о Милоше Керкезе после его гола против Грузии:
«Он, возможно, и не самый умный парень в мире, но он всегда отдает себя полностью на поле – и сердцем, и телом. Последнее, чего я ожидал, это гол головой от него, но я очень рад, что так вышло!»
Да, это реальная цитата – Собо описал Милоша прямым переводом английской идиомы «not the sharpest knife in the drawer» («не самый острый нож в ящике»), которая…
Бывший финансовый советник «Манчестер Сити» Стефан Борсон о Мак Аллистере:
«Думаю, интерес к нему будет. Ходили слухи, что этим летом за ним действительно следил «Манчестер Сити».
Этим летом они уже делали предложения, но, если говорить совершенно откровенно, с ним подпишут новый контракт с «Ливерпулем».
Это один из тех случаев, когда, на мой взгляд, вероятность того, что все закончится без нового контракта, крайн…
Во вчерашнем матче между сборными Грузии и Венгрии встретились партнёры по «Ливерпулю».
Победила команда Собо, Керкеза и Печи – причём победный гол забил именно Милош, пробив головой после навеса.
Неплохой момент был и у Дома, но его удар с дальней дистанции в сторону девятки был отбит Мамардашвили.
Ну а вот так тепло ребята перекинулись парой слов уже после игры.
Рио Нгумоа в интервью ITV Sport:
«Когда я уходил из «Челси», мной интересовалось несколько клубов, но «Ливерпуль» всегда был для меня правильным – пожалуй, даже единственным возможным – выбором. Я знал: если я перейду туда, у меня будет возможность показать себя и путь к основе. Пока что все складывается именно так».
🛑 О том, как он видит свою карьеру через 10 лет:
«Я надеюсь, что несколько раз выиграю за это врем…
Зинедин Зидан о Жереми Жаке после матча против Италии (1:1):
«Он очень хорош. Очень, очень хорош. Очень храбрый парень, не боится играть высоко, но не теряет позицию. Очень хорош в дуэлях. Еще раз повторюсь — он был очень хорош. Кажется, я сказал это четыре раза за последнюю минуту».
Льюис Данк забил лучший гол сентября в АПЛ, Паскаль Гросс признан лучшим игроком сентября в АПЛ, Фабиан Хюрцелер – лучшим тренером.
Однако, что забавно, человек посередине – самый молодой на этой фотографии.
custom 5278631466685723657333❤71🫡19
Signed Адиль
Showing the 12 most recent of 713 posts we hold for @sixELCE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sixELCE edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы оцените трансферное окно на вход в целом, если за оставшееся до конца ТО время подпишут только Барколя и Минте?
Положительно28%
50/5046%
Отрицательно26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 713 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Liverpool FC | Ливерпуль @ynwateam · 27,016 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Ливерпуль ~ YNWA @liverpoolfc_tg · 60,243 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Семнадцатый номер @deginc17 · 29,801 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 8 September 2026
Европейские Середняки @eseredniaki · 19,585 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 September 2026
Портье Дрогба @portiedrogba · 35,000 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе @cholo_football · 45,353 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Эль Хугадор | Денис Алхазов @alhasbro · 25,675 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер @telingaterEPL · 27,206 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ @CaptainFint · 42,174 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Трансферный рынок @transferik · 28,872 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
La Saeta Rubia @LSR_RM · 32,650 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
We Are The Arsenal | Арсенал @wearethearsenal · 49,414 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Nakorotke @nakorotke1 · 30,037 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
АПЛ • Футбол Англии @tg_epl · 52,582 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Вадим Лукомский @lukomski · 44,684 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Английский футбол - АПЛ | GOALTEAM @tg_apl_football · 31,768 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Картавый Футбол объединяет! @KFNik · 95,890 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
ФУТБОЛЬНИК @football_nik · 108,689 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Football & FPL ⚽️ Fantasy Premier League @FPLFootball · 18,841 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 October 2026
Английский Акцент @englishaccent · 38,822 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
ƏDƏBİYYAT {Nübar Ağayeva} @edebiyyat_th · 24,894 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
Breakeven’s | Челси @breakevens · 56,873 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа @pgorodnitskiy · 51,145 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Туманный Альбион @AlbionMain · 87,061 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шесть Элче | Ливерпуль” (@sixELCE), 22,013 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sixELCE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
