Канал о лондонском Арсенале 🔴⚪️
👥 Мы в ВК: https://vk.com/arsscnews
🗨 Наш чат: t.me/arsscnews
📞 Связь: @andrew_lexus
🙅♂️ Рекламу ставок и все, что с этим связано не делаем!
Теги: Арсенал, Артета, футбол, АПЛ.
Created
19 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net +189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,293–11,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 22:56
11,548
-5
6 Nov 2026, 22:16
11,553
+2
5 Nov 2026, 23:47
11,551
-20
4 Nov 2026, 23:00
11,571
+22
3 Nov 2026, 19:19
11,549
+10
2 Nov 2026, 16:07
11,539
+5
1 Nov 2026, 14:28
11,534
+1
31 Oct 2026, 15:27
11,533
+10
30 Oct 2026, 12:17
11,523
-4
29 Oct 2026, 13:59
11,527
+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:29
11,526
+4
27 Oct 2026, 17:57
11,522
+6
26 Oct 2026, 20:00
11,516
-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:36
11,520
-8
24 Oct 2026, 21:15
11,528
+2
23 Oct 2026, 22:27
11,526
+11
22 Oct 2026, 20:30
11,515
+2
21 Oct 2026, 14:54
11,513
-3
20 Oct 2026, 07:56
11,516
-2
19 Oct 2026, 04:31
11,518
first reading
Engagement
890 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 11,548 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
170
of 890 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
890 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
448,932
Reactions total
13,703
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈109,000
Videos
≈8,730
Links
≈10,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 45m
Average length
2m 18s
Measured directly from 98 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
93,081 reactions across 865 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24,641
26.5%
👍
17,557
18.9%
🤣
16,910
18.2%
🔥
9,195
9.88%
custom 5386587088873331829
4,712
5.06%
👎
3,296
3.54%
🤯
1,898
2.04%
custom 5303517056954554774
1,867
2.01%
👀
1,475
1.58%
😭
1,434
1.54%
😱
1,225
1.32%
🤔
1,207
1.30%
custom 5393367042642424178
1,086
1.17%
🗿
1,065
1.14%
⚡
1,057
1.14%
👏
668
0.718%
💔
603
0.648%
🤬
602
0.647%
🏆
580
0.623%
💯
512
0.55%
4 further kinds
1,491
1.60%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 886 of the 890 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95,217 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 890 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 888 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arsenalway. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 890 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.112%
1 of 890 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,440
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,340
over 887 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHwFKqC
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 890 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 170 posts held from the last 30 days (5.29%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Я хочу вернуться к слову „привлекательный“. И задать людям вопрос: мы называем такой футбол привлекательным только потому, что привыкли именно к нему? Мы видели «Манчестер Сити», «Барселону» и множество других команд, которые играют в похожем стиле и уверенно обыгрывают соперников.
Но я достаточно давно слежу за футболом, чтобы помнить: ещё до того, как этот стиль стал эталоном привлекательной игры, существовало мн…
🗣Майк Дин разбирает эпизод и признаёт, что первоначально сам ошибся в оценке момента:
«Хаверц не вступает в борьбу за мяч, поэтому нарушения правила «вне игры» ещё нет. Прежде чем он успевает начать борьбу за мяч, происходит удерживание за футболку. Таким образом, фол предшествует офсайду.
Я понимаю, что некоторым сложно это принять, ведь они рассуждают так: он всё равно находился в положении вне игры. Но поскольк…
🗣 Бывший помощник арбитра АПЛ Даррен Канн объяснил, почему «Арсенал» должен был получить пенальти за фол на Кае Хаверце в матче с «Халл Сити».
Эксперт разобрал эпизод с точки зрения правила 11 — положения «вне игры»:
«Неназначенный пенальти вызвал много обсуждений. Постараюсь объяснить, что произошло, хотя это довольно сложный аспект правила 11.
Фол должен был иметь приоритет над офсайдом, и вместо фиксации положе…
Showing the 12 most recent of 890 posts we hold for @arsenalway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Arsenal | Арсенал @tgarsenal · 31,142 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
We Are The Arsenal | Арсенал @wearethearsenal · 49,507 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
MAN SITI | RASMIY @mansiti_khusanov · 28,625 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 13 September 2026
Вадим Лукомский @lukomski · 45,169 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Английский Акцент @englishaccent · 39,772 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
Картавый Футбол объединяет! @KFNik · 95,841 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
ARSENAL | RASMIY @arsenaluz_arsenalt · 28,595 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 September 2026
АПЛ • Футбол Англии @tg_epl · 52,440 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер @telingaterEPL · 26,983 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
ФУТБОЛ |Новости футбола 📃 @footballnovosty · 58,613 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Туманный Альбион @AlbionMain · 86,102 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Arsenal @arsenal_london · 142,889 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Arsenal | Gunners Update @gunners_update · 21,615 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Breakeven’s | Челси @breakevens · 57,129 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Шесть Элче | Ливерпуль @sixELCE · 22,521 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Arsenal Way | Арсенал” (@arsenalway), 11,548 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsenalway.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
