Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пархомбюро

Channel

Пархомбюро

@sparkhomenkovoice

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

28,674subscribers

-266 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121568708
TypeChannel
Username@sparkhomenkovoice
DescriptionЯ - Сергей Пархоменко, и это мое Пархомбюро. YouTube-канал здесь: www.YouTube.com/user/sparkhom Поддержать мои стримы, каналы и подкасты: https://patreon.com/sut_edy https://friendly2.me/support/sergey_parkhomenko/ @sparkhom
Created26 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sparkhomenkovoice

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,67428,94028,8075 August 2026 — 28,940 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,940 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,938 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,934 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,937 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,938 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,928 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,926 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,925 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,909 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,900 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,885 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,862 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,863 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,862 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,852 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,846 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,828 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,821 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,855 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,843 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,834 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,831 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,827 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,816 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,815 subscribers7 September 2026 — 28,788 subscribers10 September 2026 — 28,744 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,730 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,699 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,689 subscribers17 September 2026 — 28,674 subscribers5 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,634–28,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:5928,674-15
15 Sept 2026, 17:4028,689-10
14 Sept 2026, 01:2128,699-31
12 Sept 2026, 07:2028,730-14
10 Sept 2026, 05:5528,744-44
7 Sept 2026, 02:1928,788-27
4 Sept 2026, 12:4128,815-1
2 Sept 2026, 23:3728,816-11
1 Sept 2026, 20:4528,827-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:0728,831-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:2728,834+7
30 Aug 2026, 05:2628,827-16
29 Aug 2026, 03:5228,843-12
28 Aug 2026, 03:0728,855+34
27 Aug 2026, 03:2628,821-7
26 Aug 2026, 03:0328,828-18
24 Aug 2026, 23:5528,846-6
23 Aug 2026, 14:3728,852-10
22 Aug 2026, 01:4528,862-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:1328,863first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 28,674 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,670
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held88 (19 July 202619 September 2026)
Views total320,830
Reactions total5,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,280
Videos
101
Links
1,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 35s
Average length
4m 52s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,140 reactions across 85 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,57240.7%
5,45833.8%
😢1,2327.63%
🤮1,0466.48%
🔥8225.09%
😱4732.93%
👏4572.83%
👎800.496%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 88 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sparkhomenkovoice. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC≈4,580 views126 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Господибожемой. Куда только не заведёт меня очередная серия "Сути еды". Какую только херню не приходится читать... "...В «нормальном» состоянии Ленин тяготел к размеренной, упорядоченной жизни без всяких эксцессов. Он хотел, чтобы она была регулярной, с точно установленными часами пищи, сна, работы, отдыха. Он не курил, не выносил алкоголя, заботился о своем здоровье, для этого ежедневно занимался гимнастикой. Он —

55😱38👍19🤮11🔥3

15 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈7,670 views103 reactions1 Starread 20 September 2026
File

Аудиоверсия вчерашнего разговора в программе "Обсудим". Для тех, кому трудно - или просто неохота - добираться до Ютюба:

👍7423🤮6

14 Sept 2026, 15:55 UTC≈8,490 views130 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Буквально через пять минут заходите сюда: https://www.youtube.com/live/2PT1mwqLze0?si=gDlDYF6wqpMYYiVR Начинаем в 19-00 по Москвые разговор с Александром Плющевым в программе "Обсудим" на канале "Брекфаст шоу". Сегодня масса всякого напроисходило уже, так что обсуждать сильно есть чего.

🔥52👍3731🤮10

12 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC≈10,300 views160 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Я уже анонсировал тут очередной наш разговор с Татьяной Фельгенгауэр на гастрономические темы, - мы теперь ежемесячно устраиваем такие совместные эфиры, под многозначительным заголовком “Владение умами”. В этот раз новый выпуск немножко задержался, но вот теперь пришел час. Будем разговаривать в 14-00 по Москве (13-00 по Берлину, Парижу и проч) вот тут: https://www.youtube.com/live/iIPrqpJTGH0?si=GvbUNVUQe1NdgKji Р

104👍45🤮9👎1😢1

10 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC≈11,500 views536 reactions3 Starsread 20 September 2026

Посмотрел в сегодняшней утренней программе “Брекфаст шоу” заявление военного обозревателя Юрия Федорова о том, что он прекращает сотрудничество с каналом, поскольку осуждает интервью, сделанное вчера Александром Плющевым с бывшим депутатом германской партии АДГ Евгением Шмидтом. Федоров посчитал это интервью “предоставлением трибуны” для АДГ. В связи с этим я только что оставил комментарий под постом Юрия Федорова, г

👍383128🤮12🔥8😱5

9 Sept 2026, 10:51 UTC≈8,150 views103 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

А вот второй эфир - на Брекфаст Шоу с Александром Плющевым:

👍7421🤮8

9 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC≈7,860 views89 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

Выложу срезу две аудиоверсии последних моих ютюб-эфиров. Они состоялись на двух разных каналах, с интервалом в три часа. темы и там и там оперативные, то есть во многом совпадающие. Это не просто: с одной стороны, оба раза говорить по существу, с другой, стараться избегать текстуальных повторов. Вот послушайте, как получилось. Это один эфир - на Живом Гвозде с Ольгой Журавлевой:

45👍38🤮6

8 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC≈9,520 views219 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Выложили сегодня на все крупнейшие подкастные платформы новую серию “Сути еды”, моего подкаста о гастрономической истории. Она про лосося - точнее, про лососей, потому что рыба эта очень многоликая, и даже если не брать в расчет всяких лососевых родственников, вроде сига, омуля, муксуна и прочих хариусов, все равно еще останется великое множество разных сёмг, горбуш, чавычей, нерок, не говоря уж про кету, кижуча и… Э

145👍48🔥21🤮5

7 Sept 2026, 19:36 UTC≈7,640 views119 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Ну и вот такой традиционный понедельничный разговор с Александром Плющевым в программе "Обсудим" на канале "Брекфаст шоу" сегодня состоялся - https://www.youtube.com/live/m_b663-Vxfc?si=ErXM4bp5hWF4gI81 Посмотрите, там все такое свежее и хрусткое. А чуть позже аудиоерсии выложу обоих сегодняшних эфиров.

👍8822🤮8🔥1

7 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈8,000 views104 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Если не успели подключиться к разговору на Живом Гвозде, - то вот: https://www.youtube.com/live/UNuKzJgnwVc?si=yJ1b9Dz3wdVFyIE5 Посмотрите в записи, это ничуть не менее увлекательно, чем впрямую. Уверяю вас.

52👍40🤮8👏2🔥2

7 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈8,040 views92 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Прямо вот сейчас, сию минуту буду в Живом Гвозде говорить с Ольгой Журавлевой. Да, я не оговорился, именно в Живом Гвозде - по старой памяти. А "Обсудим" на "Брекфаст шоу" в 19-00 по Москве - тоже обязательно будет, на своем месте. Так совпало, что сегодня - две порции эфира...

👍80🤮6🔥42

7 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC≈8,440 views111 reactionsread 20 September 2026

UPDATE: Ну вот, и с момента, когда был задан этот вопрос, - тоже 24 часа прошло, и я, как и было обещано, сообщаю правильный ответ. Фредерик Тюдор торговал, действительно, льдом. Бриг “Фаворит” именно льдом и был нагружен. Спасибо всем, кто честно участвовал в поисках ответа, а не пытался отыскать ответ в Гугле или в разговоре с чатомжипити.

👍8311🔥7👏6🤮4

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @sparkhomenkovoice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@sparkhomenkovoice edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,264
#1
Antony Nut
@orex62 · 51,464
#2
ЭХО / Новости
@echoonline_news · 72,634
#3
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 300,961
#4
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 45,545
#5
И Грянул Грэм
@gremtelegram · 113,849
#6
Таня Ф.
@tanya_f · 21,201
#7
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 210,902
#8
Романова
@oooromanova · 19,979
#9
Можем объяснить
@mozhemobyasnit · 461,850
#10
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#11
Михаил Ходорковский
@khodorkovski · 153,678
#12
Фёдор Крашенинников
@fyodork · 13,271
#13
Тихон Дзядко
@tdzyadko · 19,954
#14
Котрикадзе иностранных дел
@k_kotrikadze · 21,776
#15
Максим Курников
@kournikov · 18,242
#16
ЗАХАРОВ
@zakharovchannel · 30,145
#17
SOTA
@sotaproject · 103,580
#18
Генерал СВР
@generalsvr · 280,399
#19
Professor Preobrazhensky
@ivan_preobraz · 9,761
#20
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 176,254
#21
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#22
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
#23
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#24
Белковский
@SBelkovskiy · 67,474
#25
Аббас Галлямов
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,919
#26
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#27
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,933
#28
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 387,062
#29
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,881
#30
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 113,413
#31
ЭХО FM
@echofm_online · 39,446
#32
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 452,612
#33
Город Глуповъ
@gorodglupov · 156,244
#34
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 115,689
#35
The Insider
@theinsider · 151,910
#36
ЧТД
@chtddd · 448,363
#37
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 694,274
#38
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,541
#39
АДАГАМОВ
@adagamov_online · 27,463
#40
Andrey Malgin
@AndreyMalginItalia · 18,797
#41
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 102,332
#42
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#43
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,999
#44
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#45
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,967
#46
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#47
Vsya takaya Mongayt
@vsyatakayamongayt · 33,037
#48
DW Главное
@dwglavnoe · 83,157
#49
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#50
ASTRA
@astrapress · 343,623
#51
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#52
NEXTA Live
@nexta_live · 767,216
#53
Гретцки Орех
@GretzkyOrex2 · 9,419
#54
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,460
#55
Коля Хадашот
@gurevichonline · 42,037
#56
Leonid Nevzlin
@leonidnevzlin · 42,376
#57
Дабл Ять
@otsuka_bld · 160,561
#58
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,441
#59
Ватное болото
@vatnoeboloto · 382,750
#60
KUCHER
@StanislavKucher · 31,185
#61
Радио Свобода / Radio Svoboda (ru)
@radiosvoboda · 102,074
#62
BILD на русском
@BILD_Russian · 68,071
#63
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 75,680
#64
Соловьиный Помёт
@slvn_pomet · 283,119
#65
Alex Exler online
@exler443 · 17,241
#66
Альфред Кох
@AlfredKochBayern · 42,046
#67
УНИАН - новости Украины | война с Россией | новини України | війна з Росією | УНІАН
@uniannet · 706,499
#68
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#69
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#70
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 649,498
#71
Eto Boris Akunin
@EtoBorisAkunin · 50,742
#72
Настоящий Низовцев
@Nizovtsev · 8,444
#73
Leonid Volkov
@leonid_volkov · 22,132
#74
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,263
#75
baunovhaus
@baunovhaus · 36,103
#76
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,282
#77
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#78
Николай Травкин
@NTravkin · 25,306
#79
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,512
#80
Еловский
@delovsky · 7,810
#81
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,324
#82
Александр Роднянский
@alexander_rodnyansky · 42,962
#83
Взрывы домов. Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 166,652
#84
latynina.tv
@Ylatynina · 27,969
#85
Дмитрий Львович Быков
@dmibykov · 40,355
#86
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,422
#87
Смирнов
@minjustuebki · 17,719
#88
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,628
#89
SergeiMedvedev
@SergeiMedvedevPublic · 8,236
#90
Сергей Алексашенко
@NewsAboutCrisis · 14,485
#91
Восточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 83,635
#92
Сирена
@news_sirena · 120,845
#93
Дежурный по Израилю
@israeltoday · 140,382
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vladimir Pastukhov
@v_pastukhov · 153,117
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Antony Nut
@orex62 · 51,464
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Boris Pastukhov
@b_pastukhov · 24,899
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
ЗАХАРОВ
@zakharovchannel · 30,145
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,264
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Николай Травкин
@NTravkin · 25,306
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Дмитрий Львович Быков
@dmibykov · 40,355
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 45,545
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Eto Boris Akunin
@EtoBorisAkunin · 50,742
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
latynina.tv
@Ylatynina · 27,969
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Живой Гвоздь
@livegvozd · 65,941
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
ЭХО / Новости
@echoonline_news · 72,634
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
И Грянул Грэм
@gremtelegram · 113,849
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
KUCHER
@StanislavKucher · 31,185
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Белковский
@SBelkovskiy · 67,474
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Мозг на полную
@full_brains · 21,979
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Leonid Volkov
@leonid_volkov · 22,132
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Набутовы
@nabutov3 · 44,100
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Дилетант | Официальный канал
@diletantmagazine · 24,128
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Аббас Галлямов
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,919
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
ЭХО FM
@echofm_online · 39,446
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Vsya takaya Mongayt
@vsyatakayamongayt · 33,037
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
baunovhaus
@baunovhaus · 36,103
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Альфред Кох
@AlfredKochBayern · 42,046
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q4346241 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelSergey Parkhomenko
DescriptionRussian journalist
X / Twitter@Sparkhom
YouTubeUC5wRw_R3kzwV5zGe7kzec8A

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пархомбюро” (@sparkhomenkovoice), 28,674 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sparkhomenkovoice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.