Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Professor Preobrazhensky

Channel

Professor Preobrazhensky

@ivan_preobraz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,785subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648157599
TypeChannel
Username@ivan_preobraz
Created18 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ivan_preobraz

Growth

9,7759,8369,805.55 August 2026 — 9,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,830 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,813 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,809 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,797 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,783 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,775 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,801 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,799 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,800 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,788 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,785 subscribers9,7855 August 202611 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 36 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,766–9,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:419,785-3
6 Sept 2026, 12:169,788-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:179,800+1
30 Aug 2026, 05:359,799-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:249,801+26
24 Aug 2026, 07:339,775-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:379,783-14
17 Aug 2026, 10:559,797-12
13 Aug 2026, 12:589,809-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:509,813-17
6 Aug 2026, 22:309,830-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:499,836no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:459,836first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 9,785 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,780
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held34 (17 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total37,820
Reactions total1,039
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,114 reactions across 33 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,02733.0%
🤬39112.6%
😁3069.83%
2317.42%
💯2126.81%
🤡1876.01%
💊1605.14%
🤔1424.56%
😢1013.24%
😨581.86%
👏441.41%
🔥411.32%
😈300.963%
🤯300.963%
🤷‍♂290.931%
💔210.674%
🥴150.482%
😱140.45%
🤷‍♀140.45%
🤨120.385%
13 further kinds491.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 34 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ivan_preobraz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,680 views114 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Старые фашисты против молодых нацистов История отмены выступления в Санкт-Петербурге концерта неонациста Канье Уэста из США (которого стыдливо называют "симпатизирующим Гитлеру" в российских медиа) - это очень показательный кейс. Немногие помнят, но в начале полномасштабной войны, пока на первом шоке, мозги у части россиян временно прочистились, а коллективные венедиктов-собчак не засрали их назад, социолог Григорий

😁45💯34🤔17👍106🤡1🤷‍♂1

25 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈2,740 views57 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Посадить Кочаряна - не рассориться еще сильне с Путиным, сложная задача Пашиняна Второй президент Армении Роберт Кочарян и его сын, бизнесмен Седрак Кочарян, задержаны. Одновременно появилась информация, что новым послом Армении в РФ может быть назначен замглавы МИД Мнацакан Сафарян, пишет газета Рast. Сафарян курирует в МИД евразийское направление и находится в хороших отношениях с Сергеем Лавровым, утверждает из

👍34😁138🤔2

22 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,540 views104 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Президентку Словении заподозрили в связи с российской разведчицей Парламентский комитет Словении по безопасности запросил у разведывательной службы SOVA срочную информацию о возможных связях президента страны Наташи Пирц-Мусар с российской разведкой. Заседание с представителями службы должно состояться на следующей неделе, сообщает местное издание Svet24. Поводом для проверки стали публикации в медиа о давней подру

👍43🤯28💯15🤡65🔥3🤣2🤬2

22 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈3,760 views124 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

В России возвращенных территорий будет все больше и больше, - заявил бывший президент и бывший человек Димон Медведев. Он сказал это на съезде Единой России, куда приехал и Путин, фактически мобилизовав эту псевдопартию на войну, а сфальсифицированные тотально псевдовыборы и нарисованные их итоги заранее назвал всеобщей поддержкой россиянами его кровавой преступной войны. Но я, вообще-то, я не о Путине, хер с ним,

🤬68🤡38👍6🥴5💊4😢21

22 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈3,350 views74 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Лучший способ спровоцировать демонстрации - потребовать их запретить Интересно, зачем они Кремлю, показать, что эмиграция якобы пытается повлиять на его электоральную чпецоперацию? Россия попросила другие страны запретить демонстрации у российских посольств в день выборов. МИД РФ направил ноты протеста МИД других стран с просьбой "принять адекватные меры по защите избирательных участков".

😁68💯6

20 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈3,710 views141 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Для оккупации Украины нашли святого покровителя Путин прибыл в Архангельский собор Московского Кремля. Он как почетный папа римский и патриах РПЦ лично освятит собранные там косточки (шутка). Ранее во время реставрационных работ там якобы были обнаружены мощи Дмитрия Донского. Понятно, что их используют в военных целях, как все сейчас. Вспоминается первая большая пиар-кампания большевиков против Православной церкв

🤡98💯16😈12🤬74👍3🌚1

19 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈4,060 views167 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

"...И люди, стрелявшие в наших отцов, строят планы на наших детей..." В Якутии открыли уже десятый бюст Сталина. Памятник установили в селе Бютейдях, а на открытии выступил экс губернатор Иркутской области Сергей Левченко. Он заявил, что бюст должен передавать будущим поколениям память о Сталине. После снятия ткани собравшиеся встретили памятник аплодисментами и криками «Ура». Левченко также отметил, что КПРФ прод

🤬108💊49😡5👻32

19 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC≈4,230 views66 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

... Черноморская блокада меняет правила игры В первый год полномасштабной агрессии России против Украины мировые рынки зерна переживали сложные времена. Россия захватила хлеборобный юг Украины, запасы зерна были разграблены и распроданы, посевная нарушена военными действиями. Затем была заключена при посредничестве Турции "зерновая сделка". Потом Россия отказалась ее соблюдать. Однако изменение военной ситуации поз

👍47😱7❤‍🔥5🕊2🤔211😢1

17 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈4,170 views71 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Мусорные короли - клан Партушевых вытеснил Чаек с российских помоек Семья бывшего руководителя ФСБ и помощника Владимира Путина Николая Патрушева получила контроль над компанией, которая является ключевым игроком при многомиллиардном переделе мусорного рынка в России, почему-то называемого реформой. Новым гендиректором компании по комплексному обращению с коммунальными отходами «Российский экологический оператор» (Р

😁35👍15🥴105🤡5🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈5,580 views121 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Путин намерен всех съесть, но может быть не сейчас Примерно так звучали сегодня выходившие в западных медиа статьи о России. Такого потока буллшита или как минимум белого шума давно не проливалось. Вначале все начали цитировать The New York Times, которое в расследовании по результатам бесед с активистами, написало текст в формате "капитан очевидность". Оказывается, Путин хочет подчинить Молдову. В тексте пересказы

😁75👍2510🤷‍♂9🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,730 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Поговорили про борьбу за прекращение войны, отсутствие у оппозиции стратегии, выходящий за рамки псевдовыборов и казус "Яблока" Верховный суд Российской Федерации снял единственную в бюллетене "антивоенную" партию "Яблоко" с выборов в Госдуму. Суд принял такое решение, рассмотрев иск провластной партии "Родина", которая обвинила партию в экстремизме и нарушении авторских прав. В интервью Главреду политолог, эксперт

👍477🤡1

10 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈6,170 views81 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🍏 вернули в реквизит. А вот пример неверного анализа и правильного прогноза - так бывает? (Да) «Яблоко» хотели допустить, чтобы показать маргинальность антивоенной позиции, но вмешались силовики (спорный анализ) — политолог Михаил Комин Изначально в администрации президента могли планировать допустить «Яблоко» до выборов, чтобы обеспечить ему результат ниже 5% и представить это как доказательство того, что антивоен

👍37🤬315🤡4😁2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @ivan_preobraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTCAnonymous Poll1,110 voters approx.

Верите ли в новую большую мобилизацию в сентябре?

  1. Мобилизация и так идет, указ Путина 2022 года не отменялся51%
  2. Конечно. Я вижу, как российские власти готовятся25%
  3. Я не в России, мне все равно9%
  4. Конечно, и после нее Россия победит0%
  5. Верю, готовлюсь и собираюсь уехать в начале сентября1%
  6. Мобилизация будет и это станет началом конца, потому что все рухнет19%
  7. Не будет никакой мобилизации6%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTCAnonymous Poll531 voters

Политолог Екатерина Шульман о причинах участия "Яблока" в выборах в Госдуму:

  1. Екатерина Шульман много раз говорила, что не дает прогнозы23%
  2. Отстаньте от меня с этими "выборами", идет война, а это чушь22%
  3. Что это, если не прогноз?8%
  4. Я всегда голосую за Яблоко16%
  5. Это Кремль включил своих агентов, чтобы помешать единственной антивоенной партии11%
  6. Кто все эти люди, и новые, и старые?19%
  7. Я политикой не интересуюсь, вся ваша политика - это схематозы2%
  8. Зачем спрашиваете?14%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пархомбюро
@sparkhomenkovoice · 28,744
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Подосокорский
@podosokorsky · 29,836
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Бедный Рюрик
@akalitin · 30,371
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Professor Preobrazhensky” (@ivan_preobraz), 9,785 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivan_preobraz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.