Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,602–44,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:26
43,680
-14
5 Nov 2026, 04:28
43,694
-16
4 Nov 2026, 07:07
43,710
-3
3 Nov 2026, 05:46
43,713
-7
2 Nov 2026, 08:57
43,720
-26
1 Nov 2026, 07:30
43,746
-7
31 Oct 2026, 09:17
43,753
-11
30 Oct 2026, 11:55
43,764
-4
29 Oct 2026, 11:18
43,768
-3
28 Oct 2026, 09:37
43,771
-10
27 Oct 2026, 08:38
43,781
+7
26 Oct 2026, 11:45
43,774
+22
25 Oct 2026, 11:55
43,752
-31
24 Oct 2026, 14:09
43,783
-22
23 Oct 2026, 15:30
43,805
-18
22 Oct 2026, 14:10
43,823
-20
21 Oct 2026, 08:18
43,843
-4
20 Oct 2026, 06:01
43,847
-11
19 Oct 2026, 03:31
43,858
-4
18 Oct 2026, 00:38
43,862
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 43,680 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,600
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
86 (12 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
228,840
Reactions total
6,032
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
521
Videos
26
Links
822
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
26,783 reactions across 50 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
15,061
56.2%
❤
8,826
33.0%
👏
1,076
4.02%
🔥
970
3.62%
💩
166
0.62%
🕊
114
0.426%
🤝
89
0.332%
❤🔥
84
0.314%
🏆
70
0.261%
👻
59
0.22%
🤔
39
0.146%
💯
37
0.138%
😢
27
0.101%
👌
23
0.086%
🥰
16
0.06%
🤡
14
0.052%
😁
11
0.041%
⚡
10
0.037%
💔
10
0.037%
🤯
10
0.037%
14 further kinds
71
0.265%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🖥 Вопросы для «Набузили»
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+
🔊 Начинаем подготовку к новому выпуску «Набузили» — нашей регулярной ютуб-беседе.
💬 В комментариях к этому посту можно задавать вопросы, делиться мнением и даже бузить о происходяще…
Наброски #262 / https://youtu.be/iv3VVBlxpMc
Путин на саммите Россия – Африка, эвакуация мирных жителей из Олешек и неожиданные дипломатические перлы.
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+
В новой «Перловке» обсуждаем кремлёвские выступления, президента Южн…
Девяностые не ушли #9 / https://youtu.be/9URL_d0QIAY
Как советские директора превратились в российских миллиардеров? Спасали ли они заводы в девяностые или присваивали собственность, созданную целой страной? Вспоминаем ваучерную приватизацию, Мордашова, Турчака, Ходорковского и трагическую историю Дмитрия Филиппова. И разбираемся, почему спустя тридцать лет российские власти снова пересматривают итоги приватизации, …
Ответы на невошедшее в «Набузили» #53
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+
Набузили #99 / https://youtu.be/i5ryrrcwgGQ
Гуманитарная катастрофа в Олешках, будущее России после Путина, Ходорковский и новое интервью Владимира Познера. В свежем выпуске «Набузили» бузим и отвечаем на ваши вопросы о войне и её последствиях, возможной новой оттепели, отмене выборов мэров, внутренней эмиграции и причинах отъезда из России. Вспоминаем Бориса Гребенщикова, обсуждаем возвращение сталинских названий и…
Ответы на невошедшее в «Набузили» #52
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+
Наброски #261 / https://youtu.be/Os4Z8gt3ud4
Визит Стива Уиткоффа к Путину, разговоры о «новой Ялте» и очередные исторические откровения российского президента в интервью Павлу Зарубину.
НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+
В новом выпуске «Набросков» разб…
Набутовы pinned «🖥 Вопросы для «Набузили» НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ НАБУТОВЫМ КИРИЛЛОМ ВИКТОРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА НАБУТОВА КИРИЛЛА ВИКТОРОВИЧА / 18+ 🔊 Начинаем подготовку…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @nabutov3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Радио Свобода / Radio Svoboda (ru) @radiosvoboda · 101,780#96
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Parfenon @leonidparfenov_official · 77,584 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
А поговорить? | Ирина Шихман @apogovoritofficial · 44,505 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Серебряный Дождь @Silverrainradio · 42,013 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Набутовы” (@nabutov3), 43,680 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nabutov3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.