Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,303–7,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 15:02
7,486
+9
15 Sept 2026, 12:17
7,477
+21
11 Sept 2026, 14:57
7,456
+29
6 Sept 2026, 16:18
7,427
+14
2 Sept 2026, 07:23
7,413
+5
30 Aug 2026, 14:19
7,408
+21
27 Aug 2026, 22:02
7,387
+15
25 Aug 2026, 01:34
7,372
-3
21 Aug 2026, 05:54
7,375
+11
18 Aug 2026, 14:52
7,364
+12
15 Aug 2026, 17:13
7,352
+5
12 Aug 2026, 11:16
7,347
+20
9 Aug 2026, 09:53
7,327
-3
6 Aug 2026, 07:50
7,330
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:47
7,331
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 7,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
46 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
21,649
Reactions total
1,423
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,041 reactions across 44 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,769
53.5%
😁
1,316
18.7%
🔥
1,019
14.5%
👍
293
4.16%
💯
57
0.81%
❤🔥
46
0.653%
😍
44
0.625%
👏
43
0.611%
🕊
43
0.611%
🤔
42
0.597%
🥰
42
0.597%
🙏
39
0.554%
🍾
36
0.511%
🐳
35
0.497%
💔
28
0.398%
🤗
28
0.398%
💅
19
0.27%
🤝
14
0.199%
🤯
14
0.199%
🏆
13
0.185%
17 further kinds
101
1.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПРО ПЛАСТОВА
Аркадий Пластов для меня еще до поступления в Академию художеств – при чтении томов об истории советского искусства – был готовой частью соцреалистического канона. Каждый обзорный альбом содержал примерно три его произведения (с «Фашист [на самом деле “немец”] пролетел» в качестве главного хита).
В экспозиции Русского музея он тоже, помнится, был всегда. В полуденный летний зной загорелый мужчина в ста…
ВСЕГДА ЖИВОЙ
На фреске «Спасение Петра из вод Генисаретского озера» апостол Петр изображен с лицом Ленина (вычитал у Олега Юрьева). 1928, собор Вознесения Девы Марии в Мария-Зале, Австрия.
Сам художник — модернист Герман Бёкль — лениноподобие не комментировал, но прихожане сразу опознали Ильича, и был скандал, фреска была закрыта до начала 1980-х.
Бонус для тех, кто не только нас слушает, но и подписан на канал — вот то стихотворение Григория Дашевского, на которое я намекаю в последнем выпуске подкаста.
КОВЕР
«Давай, ты умер» — «Да сколько раз
уже в покойника и невесту» —
«Нет, по-другому: умер давно.
Пожалуйста, ляг на ковер, замри.
Нету креста, бурьян, но я
бываю и приношу букет.
Вот чей-то шелест — не твой ли дух:
я плачу, шепчу ему в ответ» —
— «Лучше…
МАТИСС И УЛИСС
К предыдущему: прочитал, что когда в 1935 году Матиссу заказали иллюстрации к «Улиссу», он решил, что это просто пересказ «Одиссеи». Когда его спросили, почему в его иллюстрациях сплошная Калипсо и совсе нет Блума, художник честно ответил: Je ne l'ai pas lu («Не читал»).
Говорят, что Джойс расстроился и с большой неохотой ставил автографы на этом уникальном издании «для коллекционеров» (впрочем, есть…
ПОРНОГРАФИЯ ИЛИ ИСКУССТВО?
Свежий выпуск подкаста «Неловкая пауза» — о том, как отличить настоящее непотребство от откровенного, но творчества.
И это не пустое рассуждение — все основано на прецедентном материале. Наташа рассказывает мне, как в США по обвинениям в непристойности дважды судили «Улисса» Джойса, и как великий модернистский роман повлиял на американское правоприменение.
Слушайте везде, где есть подкас…
как я представлю себе вас всех, кто пишет нам коменты! пожалуйста, пишите, не стесняйтесь!
(Фаворский, из книги Маршака «Семь чудес», оттуда же из «Зотова»)
научусь ли я когда-нибудь прилично вести себя на выставках? никогда!
в «Зотове» на выставке «Дом 21», куда я вчера тоже добежал, всего на пару часов разминувшись с Ильей
из-за того что художник по-немецки «Малер», всегда кажется, что композитор должен быть «Дюрер»
😁90❤🔥19❤5🤔3
Signed Kirill Golovastikov
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @zachemuvi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья и Кирилл” (@zachemuvi), 7,486 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zachemuvi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.