Илья Доронченков (ГМИИ, ЕУСПб) и Кирилл Головастиков (Arzamas). Мы подружились, делая подкаст про выставки «Зачем я это увидел?», а здесь будет еще больше искусства, мыслей, эмоций, неловкостей и наших лиц.
Подкаст вот: https://podcast.ru/1466828186
Created
Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +521. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,248–7,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 11:01
7,852
+25
3 Nov 2026, 18:10
7,827
+31
31 Oct 2026, 09:05
7,796
+25
28 Oct 2026, 13:01
7,771
+9
25 Oct 2026, 16:50
7,762
+13
22 Oct 2026, 13:26
7,749
+10
19 Oct 2026, 02:00
7,739
+15
16 Oct 2026, 06:10
7,724
+24
13 Oct 2026, 05:37
7,700
+82
6 Oct 2026, 15:57
7,618
+61
29 Sept 2026, 17:58
7,557
+71
19 Sept 2026, 15:02
7,486
+9
15 Sept 2026, 12:17
7,477
+21
11 Sept 2026, 14:57
7,456
+29
6 Sept 2026, 16:18
7,427
+14
2 Sept 2026, 07:23
7,413
+5
30 Aug 2026, 14:19
7,408
+21
27 Aug 2026, 22:02
7,387
+15
25 Aug 2026, 01:34
7,372
-3
21 Aug 2026, 05:54
7,375
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 7,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
64 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
41,368
Reactions total
2,414
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,040
Videos
≈10
Links
≈306
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,455 reactions across 62 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,008
53.0%
😁
1,451
15.3%
🔥
1,288
13.6%
👍
428
4.53%
❤🔥
375
3.97%
🥰
222
2.35%
👏
65
0.687%
🤔
58
0.613%
💯
57
0.603%
😍
44
0.465%
🕊
43
0.455%
💔
41
0.434%
💘
40
0.423%
🙏
39
0.412%
🍾
36
0.381%
🐳
35
0.37%
👀
32
0.338%
🤗
28
0.296%
✍
21
0.222%
💅
19
0.201%
19 further kinds
125
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
О ЗАКРОЙ СВОИ БЛЕДНЫЕ ЩЕКИ
Не ожидал, что будет столько комментариев ко вчерашней скульптурной угадайке, поэтому ответ — отдельным постом!
Все советские бюсты неизбежно похожи на Ленина — в ИМЛИ вот, помнится, стоит Горький, явно переделанный из Ильича. А все писатели, соответственно, похожи на Горького!
Но это не Горький, это Валерий Яковлевич Брюсов, только усы пообвисли вниз. Все кто угадал — молодцы, все кто …
хорнипятница вечер, поэтому вот вам несколько самых горячих работ из занавешенной комнатки на выставке «Женские страсти» в Музее Масловки
самое сокровенное не стал постить, просто поверьте
КТО ЭТОТ ПИСАТЕЛЬ?
Скульптура из музея на Масловке, 1924 год, изображает известного литератора, но… может быть, не того, о ком вы подумали?
Кто знает, терпите, а угадальщиков приглашаю в коменты.
Автор — Нина Нисс-Гольдман, но это, вроде бы, не подсказка.
Ответ тут.
Майя Плисецкая в акварели Артура Фонвизина на выставке в Еврейском музее
я совсем не знаком с Фонвизиным — чаще всего слышал про него в контексте «трех Ф» (+ Фальк + Фаворский) — трех аксакалов, которые помнили авангард и Серебряный век, и к которым ходили молодые художники за наставлением в послевоенные годы
и не знаю, способен ли я выдержать целую монографическую выставку таких акварелей… может быть было бы слишк…
В ЧЕМ ПОЛЬЗА ОТ ДАДАИЗМА
В новом выпуске «Неловкой паузы» Наташа пытается убедить меня, что Марсель Дюшан вовсе не бесполезен, и его писсуар поможет чувствовать себя модным и нарядным даже в нашем мире капитализма и одинаковой одежды из масс-маркета.
А я в ответ рассказываю глупые истории о том, что бывает, если два человека пришли на мероприятие в одной и той же одежде.
Тут, или на Arzamas, или в любых сервисах, …
УМЕРЛА КЛАРА ЦЕТКИН
любимая картина на выставке «Весть 2.0» в Еврейском музее. Владимир Малагис, 1933, из ГРМ
(любимая из числа тех, что раньше не видел — так-то там еще портрет Сталина Георгия Рублева из Третьяковки совершенно крышесносный)
(мог пропустить какие-то работы! ребенок потребовал вести его в туалет)
Не знаю, почему у этого поста не работают комменты! Если кому есть что сказать — пишите здесь.
(Ну или если вы разбираетесь в настройках телеграма, объясните мне…)
ЭТО НЕ РЕКЛАМА
но вот что я читал, чтобы подготовиться к этой таинственной загадочной записи (что же это за проект будет?..).
Один из рецензентов — И. А. Доронченков, между прочим!
И, кстати, об исследованиях Андрея Шабанова мы много говорили в нашем легендарном ковидном подкасте про первую выставку передвижников, которые оказались не столько революционерами, сколько бизнесменами...
❤97👀21🔥16✍13
Signed Kirill Golovastikov
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @zachemuvi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zachemuvi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 November 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья и Кирилл” (@zachemuvi), 7,852 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zachemuvi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.