Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,371–7,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 05:59
7,675
-4
2 Nov 2026, 19:40
7,679
-3
30 Oct 2026, 08:55
7,682
-3
27 Oct 2026, 00:16
7,685
-1
24 Oct 2026, 07:05
7,686
+11
21 Oct 2026, 15:27
7,675
+16
18 Oct 2026, 08:16
7,659
+50
15 Oct 2026, 03:09
7,609
+8
11 Oct 2026, 13:22
7,601
+8
5 Oct 2026, 08:54
7,593
+2
27 Sept 2026, 05:39
7,591
+35
18 Sept 2026, 04:39
7,556
-1
14 Sept 2026, 06:37
7,557
+1
10 Sept 2026, 17:39
7,556
+2
5 Sept 2026, 21:56
7,554
+23
29 Aug 2026, 11:13
7,531
+60
26 Aug 2026, 17:44
7,471
+15
23 Aug 2026, 08:15
7,456
+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:45
7,450
+14
16 Aug 2026, 20:17
7,436
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 7,675 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
49 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
17,211
Reactions total
330
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 00:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,460
Videos
≈97
Links
≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,212 reactions across 45 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
453
37.4%
🔥
184
15.2%
👍
175
14.4%
❤🔥
111
9.16%
👏
90
7.43%
🥰
73
6.02%
⚡
37
3.05%
🎉
18
1.49%
✍
16
1.32%
🤩
12
0.99%
💔
9
0.743%
😍
8
0.66%
🤓
6
0.495%
🤝
6
0.495%
💘
5
0.413%
🏆
4
0.33%
👌
1
0.083%
💋
1
0.083%
💯
1
0.083%
😁
1
0.083%
1 further kind
1
0.083%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗓 Дайджест наших событий
Рассказываем о недавних командировках и не только ⬇️
В Красноярске побывали на Международном спортивном форуме «Россия — спортивная держава». На деловых сессиях и в выставочной зоне встретились с авторами поддержанных нами проектов, которые развивают массовый, семейный и инклюзивный спорт. А еще познакомились с проектом Никиты Вдовина «Клево с папой» — спортивная рыбалка для пап и детей.
В…
🔭 «Ученые дамы»: цикл показов и дискуссий в «Чтиво-доме»
В рамках параллельной программы выставки «Ученые дамы. Наука без разрешения» (открыта в Музее Москвы до 10 ноября) прошли специальные показы «Ученых дам» – с участием героев и авторов проекта.
Ученые, победительницы конкурсов Стипендиальной программы Владимира Потанина – астрофизик Александра Иванова, зоолог Ксения Табачникова, микробиологи Дана Мамий, Екатер…
🏛 Музейный замысел обретает форму
Как превратить идею в музейный проект и найти способ рассказать о ней посетителю? Этим вопросам была посвящена вторая «Лаборатория замыслов Л.Ю. Копылова», прошедшая 25–27 октября в Ярославском художественном музее и музее-заповеднике Н.А. Некрасова «Карабиха».
Двадцать музейных специалистов из 16 регионов России изучали принципы и методы Леонида Юрьевича Копылова — музейного проек…
📢 Стартовал конкурс «Профессиональное развитие — 2027»
Приглашаем сотрудников вузов, НКО, музейных организаций и организаций, развивающих социальный спорт. Поддержка в конкурсе позволит освоить новые навыки или поделиться опытом с профессиональным сообществом.
Заявки на I цикл будут приниматься до 2 декабря 2026 на портале. Всего в сезоне 2026/27 состоятся три цикла конкурса с подведением итогов после каждого из н…
🎭 Что общего у Тан-батыра и Алисы в Стране чудес?
Герои сказок и книг нередко оказываются в мирах, где действуют свои правила: время течет иначе, привычные вещи меняют размер, а за обычной дверью может скрываться целая вселенная. Такие путешествия придумали задолго до Льюиса Кэрролла.
В татарских народных сказках Зухра отправляется на Луну, а Тан-батыр спускается в колодец и попадает в подземный мир. Как устроены э…
🔬 «Ученые дамы»: показ серии «Микробиология»
Что мы знаем о микроорганизмах и как исследования в этой области меняют медицину?
В Ночь Искусств 3 ноября посмотрим в «Чтиво-доме» серию «Микробиология» документального сериала «Ученые дамы».
После показа состоится дискуссия с нашими стипендиатками и героинями выставки «Ученые дамы»:
✨ Даной Мамий, аспиранткой кафедры микробиологии биологического факультета МГУ им. М.…
🗓 Дайджест наших новостей
Собрали несколько событий, о которых еще не успели рассказать.
✔️ В середине октября побывали на Мурманских научных чтениях, где обсудили роль локального наследия и поздравили Мурманский областной краеведческий музей со 100-летием. Программа включала встречу сообщества Фонда: благодаря победе в конкурсе #Мынасвязи коллеги из 14 регионов собрались за полярным кругом, чтобы обменяться опытом…
🔔 Стартовал грантовый конкурс для преподавателей 2026/27
Если вы преподаете в вузе — участнике нашей Стипендиальной программы и хотите обновить свой образовательный продукт, ждем ваши заявки на портале Фонда до 18 января 2027 года.
Приглашаем принять участие преподавателей очной магистратуры и уровня специализированного высшего образования.
Победители могут получить до 500 тысяч рублей — на актуализацию образовате…
⚡️ Минобрнауки России отметило Фонд Потанина
Фонд получил благодарность Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации за вклад в развитие высшего образования.
Награду генеральному директору Фонда Оксане Орачевой вручили заместитель министра науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации Андрей Омельчук и директор департамента экономической политики Минобрнауки Аслан Канукоев.
Награждение состояло…
🎭 Как увидеть далекие страны, не выходя из комнаты?
Задолго до появления кино люди придумывали способы отправиться в виртуальное путешествие. На помощь приходили оптические устройства и изображения.
Как работали такие визуальные аттракционы и что у них общего с кинематографом? Об этом рассказала киновед Наталия Мокрушина на лекции Arzamas в Перми.
Лекция сопровождала гастроли спектакля «Диорама Василия Поленова „В…
📢 Итоги конкурса «Практики личной филантропии и альтруизма»
Поддержку получат 52 социально значимых проекта наших грантополучателей разных лет. Они затронут самые разные темы — от волонтерства и образования до культуры и сохранения наследия.
Собрали главные цифры конкурса на карточках. Подробности и полный список победителей — на нашем сайте.
#фондпотанина #практикиличнойфилантропии
✔️9 проектов, поддержанных Фондом, — в лонг-листе «Музейного Олимпа»
Объявлен лонг-лист премии «Музейный Олимп — 2026». Она отмечает музейные проекты, которые предлагают новые форматы работы с коллекциями, посетителями и городской средой.
Среди участников лонг-листа — девять проектов, получивших нашу поддержку:
🤩 «Поваренная книга, или Опытные: кухмистер, кондитер, декабрист, его жена и некто Смольянинов» — проект…
❤12🔥6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @fondpotanin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fondpotanin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Культурная волна. Гранты ПФКИ @pfci_grants · 20,732 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Фонд президентских грантов @presidentialgrants · 20,273 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
Капитан Грантов @cptgrantov · 69,727 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фонд Потанина” (@fondpotanin), 7,675 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fondpotanin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.