27 measurements spanning 31 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,545–14,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 23:37
14,560
-1
4 Sept 2026, 12:17
14,561
-1
3 Sept 2026, 01:49
14,562
-5
2 Sept 2026, 00:13
14,567
+2
31 Aug 2026, 22:06
14,565
-2
31 Aug 2026, 00:54
14,567
-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:34
14,570
-5
28 Aug 2026, 22:54
14,575
-2
27 Aug 2026, 22:23
14,577
+4
27 Aug 2026, 01:04
14,573
-3
26 Aug 2026, 04:22
14,576
-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:27
14,581
-3
23 Aug 2026, 17:35
14,584
-2
20 Aug 2026, 17:56
14,586
-32
19 Aug 2026, 19:34
14,618
-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:12
14,619
-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:15
14,621
-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:35
14,624
-5
15 Aug 2026, 12:05
14,629
-9
13 Aug 2026, 23:15
14,638
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.67%
avg views ÷ 14,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
74 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
21,418
Reactions total
646
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 57s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
959 reactions across 71 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
350
36.5%
🔥
307
32.0%
😍
174
18.1%
👍
27
2.82%
❤🔥
15
1.56%
🤯
11
1.15%
🥰
11
1.15%
⚡
10
1.04%
💘
9
0.938%
✍
7
0.73%
🍓
6
0.626%
🤩
6
0.626%
🤔
4
0.417%
👏
3
0.313%
💯
3
0.313%
😭
3
0.313%
🙏
3
0.313%
custom 5449593103759451697
2
0.209%
👀
2
0.209%
😁
2
0.209%
3 further kinds
4
0.417%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 959 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💔 Тревожный или избегающий? Как тип привязанности управляет вашими отношениями? В новом выпуске разбираем теорию привязанности и почему мы выбираем не тех партнеров.
🔴Почему одного пугает дистанция, а другого слияние?
🔴Что такое надежный, тревожный, избегающий и дезорганизованный типы привязанности и как они влияют на любовь, дружбу и брак?
🔴Можно ли исцелить травму привязанности и построить здоровые, близкие отноше…
«Ничего не чувствую, все нормально» — говорит человек, сжимая кулаки и чувствуя ком в горле.
В гештальт-терапии такие моменты особенно важны. Здесь не спешат объяснять человеку, почему он так делает, и не выдают готовую инструкцию, как правильно. Вместо этого смотрят на то, что происходит здесь и сейчас: с телом, эмоциями, голосом, отношениями с терапевтом.
🔤 Иногда именно через это становится заметно то, что раньш…
📝 С 1 сентября!
Поздравляем всех, кто продолжает оставаться любопытным: задает вопросы, пробует новое, иногда ошибается, снова открывает учебники и не считает, что однажды должен был «выучиться всему». Собрали подборку курсов и эфиров:
Бесплатные эфиры:
🔴Погружение в профессию психолога
🔴Как выглядит работа психолога на практике
🔴Секс-терапевт сегодня: кто он, какой он и как им стать
Получение профессии:
🔴2 сентяб…
Что берем с собой в сентябрь? 🎒🌏
🟠любопытство
🟠право ошибаться
🟠умение задавать вопросы
🟠поддержку коллег
🟠отдых без чувства вины.
📝 Накануне 1 сентября вокруг снова списки покупок, сборы, расписания. И нам нравится мысль, что взрослые тоже могут воспользоваться этим моментом — только теперь самостоятельно выбрать, чему учиться дальше.
Поэтому мы подготовили подарки ко Дню знаний от преподавателей Психодемии — тол…
🎮 Вы просто играете или уже не можете остановиться?
Приглашаем вас на первую офлайн-встречу нового спецпроекта Психодемии — Лектория на Арме.
На первой живой встрече нового Лектория на Арме вместе с психотерапевтом и геймдизайнером разберемся, когда увлечение превращается в зависимость, как устроена игра изнутри и как геймдизайн удерживает наше внимание
🗓️ Когда: 10 сентября, 19:00–20:30 мск
📍 Где: Офлайн, адрес —…
Один из самых тревожных вопросов перед обучением: «А что будет после? Смогу ли я действительно начать работать психологом?»
Диплом важен, но уверенность в профессии появляется не только из теории. Она складывается из:
🔴первых сессий,
🔴обратной связи,
🔴возможности попробовать себя в роли специалиста,
🔴постепенно собрать собственный профессиональный опыт.
Поэтому в Психодемии есть несколько вариантов практики и профе…
Когда ребенку 30 лет...
Почему желание помочь взрослому ребенку иногда превращается во вмешательство в его жизнь и где проходит граница между «я рядом» и «я лучше знаю, как тебе будет правильно»?
Разбираемся на примере отношений Грега и Кэти из сериала «Рустер». И заодно смотрим, почему сепарация — это не про отдаление от родителей, а про возможность оставаться близкими уже по-другому.
Материал подготовила Екатери…
Космонавт, журналист, актриса, учительница, психолог — кажется, в детстве Ольга Раздина успела примерить на себя почти все профессии ☺ Но психология в итоге победила: изучать ее Ольга начала еще в 6 классе, а сегодня отмечает уже 20 лет практики.
Ольга Раздина — психолог, схема-терапевт, бизнес-тренер и преподаватель курса «Основы психологии: от теории к практике». 2,5 года Ольга была старшим методистом Психодемии и…
Лучше всего об обучении могут рассказать те, кто уже прошел этот путь 💙
Сегодня выпускников Психодемии уже больше 36 800. За этой цифрой — очень разные люди, истории, сомнения перед началом и свои причины однажды выбрать психологию.
В этом видео Максим Лапшин, наш выпускник, клинический психолог, терапевт контекстуально-поведенческого направления, делится своим опытом: за что полюбил обучение в Психодемии, что оказ…
❤5😍5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @psychodemia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой подход после сегодняшнего эфира откликнулся вам больше всего?
КПТ24%
ACT20%
Схема-терапия36%
Не могу выбрать — каждый по-своему интересен20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа @Inpsycho · 31,322 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 37,678 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic @psypractic_ru · 33,208 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Доктор Курпатов @kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,358 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психодемия” (@psychodemia), 14,560 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychodemia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.