Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥Сергей Сухов (стоицизм, развитие, ИИ)

Channel

🔥Сергей Сухов (стоицизм, развитие, ИИ)

@stoicstrategy

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,375subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372152834
TypeChannel
Usernames@stoicstrategy @sukhovjournal
DescriptionДелюсь своим пониманием стоицизма, опытом работы с мышлением и эмоциями. Без претензий на знание «великих истин». Не обсуждаем политику и религию. 18+ (заявление № 4814329438) 🔮 По всем вопросам пишите нам через Карла: @karl_steward_bot
Created3 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held111
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stoicstrategy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,37518,76318,5696 August 20266 November 2026
111 measurements spanning 92 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,317–18,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 111
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 08:2618,375-1
5 Nov 2026, 23:2418,376-30
5 Nov 2026, 07:0618,406no change
4 Nov 2026, 21:4418,406-3
4 Nov 2026, 08:0118,409-1
3 Nov 2026, 23:1518,410-6
3 Nov 2026, 09:4818,416-3
2 Nov 2026, 21:0618,419-5
2 Nov 2026, 11:3818,424-9
1 Nov 2026, 20:2818,433-6
31 Oct 2026, 20:2918,439+2
31 Oct 2026, 12:3818,437+3
31 Oct 2026, 00:0018,434+2
30 Oct 2026, 15:3518,432no change
29 Oct 2026, 23:0418,432-1
29 Oct 2026, 17:5818,433-7
28 Oct 2026, 20:0718,440-1
28 Oct 2026, 17:5118,441-8
27 Oct 2026, 17:3118,449no change
27 Oct 2026, 17:1518,449first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.89%
avg views ÷ 18,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.979%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held69 (21 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total29,115
Reactions total285
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈276
Videos
≈54
Links
≈1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,162 reactions across 67 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49342.4%
🔥24421.0%
👍17915.4%
💯12210.5%
🤔282.41%
😁242.07%
🤯201.72%
🕊141.20%
❤‍🔥90.775%
👀70.602%
🎉60.516%
🙏40.344%
🤨40.344%
🌚30.258%
😴30.258%
⚡20.172%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (21.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC697 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔮️️️️️️ Режим «пересборка и синхронизация» Я начал вести этот канал 3 января 2021 года. За это время написал больше 2 500 постов, то есть в среднем минимум по одному в день. И вот сегодня я решил взять паузу в публикациях. 📖️️️️️️ Почему пауза? Основных причин две. — За последние полтора месяца я провёл много исследований: несколько сотен человек заполнили анкеты, десятки откликнулись на опросы, почти с двадцатью…

🔥18❤11

Signed Сергей Сухов

4 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC807 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📖 Пара слов о моих проектах Знаю, что в последнее время я часто прошу вас что-то заполнить. Спасибо за терпение — ваши ответы мне очень помогают понять, куда двигаться дальше. У этой анкеты другая задача. Я собираю короткие отзывы тех, кто был или остаётся со мной в проектах о стоицизме. Достаточно одного-двух предложений: с чем вы пришли и что изменилось. Я ничего не продаю и ни к чему не призываю — просто прошу п…

🔥6❤1

Signed Сергей Сухов

3 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC851 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

✊️️️️️️️ Предлагаю сегодня всем вместе подумать над вопросом: "Что вас привлекает в стоицизме — чего вам не хватило в других системах и практиках?". Уверен, дискуссия получится жаркой 🔥️️️️️️. Пожалуйста, пишите свои ответы в комментариях. В игру!

❤3🔥3

Signed Сергей Сухов

2 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

☀️ Что будет в «Парадигме» в ноябре? Финальный месяц осени. Многие бессознательно уже начинают подводить итоги года. Мы тоже хотим постепенно «вкатиться» в этот процесс. Впереди много исследований и Пересборки. 🔮Что мы планируем на ноябрь? 🎁Будем проводить сессии «Вопросы — Ответы» с Сергеем Суховым. 🎁 В «Радио Парадигма» выйдет новые выпуски с ответами на ваши вопросы. 🎁Планируются онлайн-встречи для обмена опы…

❤2

Signed Сергей Сухов

1 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔥 Игровые персонажи Мы уже много раз говорили здесь про одну из самых важных концепций стоиков - концепцию Логоса. Сегодня напомню вам идею из игровой индустрии, которая можем помочь лучше понять концепцию Логоса. Итак, в игровой индустрии различают два типа персонажей: 👉 Неигровой персонаж (сокр. NPC от англ. Non-Player Character) - персонаж, которым управляет не игрок. Фактически, это часть декораций с поведен…

🔥11❤1

Signed Сергей Сухов

31 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,140 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📖 Напоминаю про небольшой опрос «Что держит вас, когда штормит?». Если ещё не успели — это займёт несколько минут. Анкета анонимная, контакты оставлять не надо. И, кажется, это тот случай, когда вопросы полезны прежде всего самому отвечающему: не так часто мы останавливаемся и спрашиваем себя, на что на самом деле опираемся. 👉 https://forms.yandex.ru/u/6ae198ecff534e511f7f1b08 Спасибо всем, кто уже ответил 🙏

❤9

Signed Сергей Сухов

30 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔥 Сегодня цитата из Сенеки для размышления «При­слу­шай­ся, и едва ли не от каж­до­го ты услы­шишь такие сло­ва: „В пять­де­сят лет уйду на покой, а с шести­де­ся­ти осво­бо­жусь от всех вооб­ще обя­зан­но­стей“. — А кто, инте­рес­но, тебе пору­чил­ся, что ты до этих лет дожи­вешь? Кто пове­лит собы­ти­ям идти имен­но так, как ты пред­по­ла­га­ешь? И к тому же, как тебе не стыд­но уде­лить для себя само­го лишь жа…

🔥25❤8

Signed Сергей Сухов

29 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,290 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📖️️️️️️ Что держит вас, когда штормит? Есть вопросы, на которые полезно ответить не ради кого-то, а ради себя. Ведь часто достаточно сформулировать что-то — и оно начинает работать гораздо лучше. Я подготовил четыре таких вопроса, помогающих глубже подумать над вашими личными «опорами». Смотрите на работу с анкетой, как на хорошее упражнение по узнаванию самого себя. 👉 Ссылка на анкету: https://forms.yandex.ru/u/…

❤8🔥2

Signed Сергей Сухов

28 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,280 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📌 Три главных минуса стоицизма Я бы сказал так: — Стоицизм подходит далеко не всем — Стоицизм в более глубоких аспектах очень труден для понимания — Утеряна живая традиция передачи знаний Что бы вы добавили?

❤6

Signed Сергей Сухов

27 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,380 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🏛️️️️️️ Задать свой вопрос Сергею Друзья, напомню, что мы готовимся к онлайн-встрече, на которой Сергей (автор этого канала) будет отвечать на ваши вопросы. Спрашивать можно о чём угодно: о стоицизме и о том, как он работает в обычной жизни, о проектах и планах, о практиках, которые помогают сохранять спокойствие и ясность, о том, как он использует ИИ, или просто о том, что сейчас читает и смотрит. 📌️️️️️️ Вопросы…

🔥6

Signed Сергей Сухов

26 Oct 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,320 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📖️️️️️️ Год книге «Мудрость стоиков» Во всей этой чехарде с юбилеем «Парадигмы» мы как-то совсем забыли, что 23 октября был ровно год с момента выхода книги Сергея Сухова «Мудрость стоиков». Подробнее о книге можно прочитать здесь >> Кстати, саму «Парадигму» мы разработали именно как инструмент, помогающий перейти от чтения книги к интенсивной практике и получить реальные перемены в жизни.

🔥6❤4

Signed Сергей Сухов

25 Oct 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,310 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔮Что уже есть в “Парадигме”? Мы буквально каждый день работаем над тем, чтобы еще больше гордиться нашим флагманским проектом — платформой “Парадигма”. Подробнее о “Парадигме” >> За последние несколько месяца мы добавили в “Парадигму” множество новых возможностей: 🔮Трек по “Физике стоиков”. Он следует сразу после базового трека по стоицизму, в котором собрано все необходимое для реального внедрения практик стоико…

🔥3❤2👀1

Signed Сергей Сухов

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @stoicstrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@stoicstrategy edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @stoicstrategy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова
@myshlenie_kurpatov · 42,863
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥Сергей Сухов (стоицизм, развитие, ИИ)” (@stoicstrategy), 18,375 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoicstrategy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.