Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психофизиолог Каплан Александр

Channel

Психофизиолог Каплан Александр

@kaplanalexandr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,571subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831057415
TypeChannel
Username@kaplanalexandr
DescriptionОфициальный канал профессора Александра Яковлевича Каплана — психофизиолога, профессора биофака МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, заведующего лабораторией нейрофизиологии и нейрокомпьютерных интерфейсов. По вопросам выступлений: @sveta_bolshakova
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaplanalexandr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5337,5737,5537 August 2026 — 7,570 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,570 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,571 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,559 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,558 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,551 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,549 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,541 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,533 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,538 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,545 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,540 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,536 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,542 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,551 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,553 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,561 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,567 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,573 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,571 subscribers7,5717 August 202630 October 2026
20 measurements spanning 84 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,527–7,579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Oct 2026, 15:547,571-2
27 Oct 2026, 09:477,573+6
24 Oct 2026, 06:307,567+6
20 Oct 2026, 23:567,561+8
11 Oct 2026, 10:197,553+2
5 Oct 2026, 02:147,551+9
26 Sept 2026, 09:177,542+6
11 Sept 2026, 20:367,536-4
7 Sept 2026, 01:017,540-5
2 Sept 2026, 04:257,545+7
29 Aug 2026, 20:367,538+5
26 Aug 2026, 23:497,533-8
24 Aug 2026, 01:127,541-8
20 Aug 2026, 10:537,549-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:487,551-7
14 Aug 2026, 17:547,558-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:177,559-12
8 Aug 2026, 07:047,571+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:307,570no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:237,570first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 7,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held41 (28 May 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total7,040
Reactions total266
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
248
Videos
83
Links
164

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21m 15s
Average length
3m 02s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,797 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,69460.6%
🔥59321.2%
👍36513.0%
👏1003.58%
🤔411.47%
👨‍💻30.107%
👎10.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,120 views94 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Мозг человека — это самый сложный, самый загадочный и самый таинственный объект во Вселенной. Он включает в себя около 86 миллиардов нейронов. Много или мало? Например, у обезьян — от 3 до 8 миллиардов. У крыс — 200 миллионов. Таракан располагает миллионом нейронов. ⠀ ⠀ Но даже 86 миллиардов клеток — это еще не всё. В самых мощных и сложных процессорах, созданных руками человека, по словам специалистов, можно насчит…

🔥49❤37🤔5👨‍💻3

26 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,490 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

20 ноября в лектории «Прямая речь» астроном Владимир Сурдин и психофизиолог Александр Каплан обсудят, готов ли человеческий мозг к жизни за пределами Земли. Лекция-дискуссия «Космическая нейробиология» 20 ноября, пятница, 19:30 Лекторий «Прямая речь» (Ермолаевский пер., 25) Приходите, обсудим пределы возможностей разума на стыке астрофизики и нейробиологии. Подробнее о встрече и билеты

❤32👍9🔥1

20 Oct 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,820 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Мозг и тело: кто кем командует? Логически это сложный вопрос: они же неразрывно вплетены друг в друга. Мозг получает информацию не только из внешней среды. Едва ли не больший поток сигналов идет от самого тела, буквально пронизанного рецепторными системами. Если полностью отсечь этот поток информации, мозг, скорее всего, просто потеряется в мире, отключится. И всё же, видимо, эволюция привела к тому, что человеческ…

❤52👍13

15 Oct 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,610 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Открытие нобелиатов поможет понять, какие участки мозга связаны с его мыслями, рассказал психофизиолог Александр Каплан. В 2026 году Нобелевскую премию по физиологии и медицине присудили Карлу Дейссероту, Петеру Хегеманну и Георгу Нагелю за открытие в области оптогенетики, которое можно использовать для поиска в мозге нейронов, отвечающих за возникновение мыслей. Суть метода в том, что в выбранные клетки доставляют…

❤38🔥22👍5

5 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,250 views82 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Свое преимущество над остальным животным миром человек получил именно благодаря развитым навыкам по обработке информации. ⠀ ⠀ Например, мозг обезьяны не способен объединить все случаи жизни в один закон движения тяжелых тел к земле. Она не знает про закон тяготения, хотя, конечно, помнит, как в некоторых испытанных ею жизненных ситуациях определенные предметы летели вниз. ⠀ ⠀ Расскажу о небольшом эксперименте. На пл…

❤44👏20🔥16👍2

20 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC≈2,500 views149 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤82🔥48👍14👏5

20 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,870 views72 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Поскольку подобные сегменты обнаруживались почти у всех из нескольких десятков монахов в процессе медитации, мы осторожно предположили, что найденные сегменты ЭЭГ в какой-то мере отражают этапы тантрической медитации. Оставалось понять, насколько сегменты ЭЭГ, выделенные у одного монаха, по своим признакам похожи на сегменты ЭЭГ у другого монаха, и так по всей группе монахов. Всего выделили в ЭЭГ 341 количественный п…

❤46🔥25👏1

20 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,220 views62 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Так, с рюкзаками, набитыми оборудованием, мы добирались к ним в гости. Но на настоящий момент уже удалось набрать 10-15 записей. Записывали также медитации отшельников в особых затворных центрах близ резиденции Его Святейшества Далай-ламы. В поисках отшельников с большим опытом глубоких медитаций мы также сделали экспедицию в королевство Бутан. Там тоже нанесли визиты в труднодоступные монастыри, где монахи посвящают…

❤34🔥26👏2

20 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,240 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Буддийские монахи из тибетских монастырей в Индии, Непале и Бутане были нашими испытуемыми и фактически соавторами в этой работе. — Почему для этого вы выбрали именно монахов? Кажется, что как будто подходят художники, архитекторы, писатели… — Перечисленные вами работники творческих профессий, несомненно, обладают повышенными, а иной раз и выдающимися, навыками образного мышления, интуиции, воображения. Но испытуем…

❤42🔥20👍3

20 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,480 views70 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В МГУ подвели итоги изучения мозга тибетских монахов Психофизиолог Каплан: мы впервые получили объективные признаки субъективных состояний Получены первые итоги многолетнего проекта российских нейрофизиологов по исследованию тантрических медитаций растворения у буддийских монахов непосредственно в тибетских монастырях. Исследователи изучали активность мозга монахов с помощью метода электроэнцефалографии (ЭЭГ). Резу…

❤46🔥24

20 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,260 views101 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Следовательно, глубинные медитации могут действительно приводить к психфизиологическим последствиям, к изменению «настроек» мозговых структур, чем, возможно, и объясняются позитивные сдвиги в психических состояниях монахов тантрической практики. Следующим этапом наших работ будет конкретный разбор, какие структуры мозга и в каких признаках ЭЭГ вовлекаются в те или иные стадии тантрической медитации. Возможно, мы так…

❤64🔥34👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @kaplanalexandr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kaplanalexandr edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @kaplanalexandr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Татьяна Черниговская
@tvchernigovskya · 111,007
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠
@dubininvaofficial · 44,754
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психофизиолог Каплан Александр” (@kaplanalexandr), 7,571 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaplanalexandr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.