Channel

Dr. Belaveshkin

@beloveshkin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,368subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001194385771
Type	Channel
Username	@beloveshkin
Created	29 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	19 September 2026
Measurements held	14
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/beloveshkin

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,348–9,522 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:41	9,368	-10
14 Sept 2026, 20:20	9,378	-12
11 Sept 2026, 10:37	9,390	-20
6 Sept 2026, 17:18	9,410	-10
1 Sept 2026, 19:23	9,420	-5
29 Aug 2026, 14:12	9,425	-6
26 Aug 2026, 11:06	9,431	-8
23 Aug 2026, 08:47	9,439	-8
19 Aug 2026, 15:27	9,447	-12
16 Aug 2026, 08:06	9,459	-18
13 Aug 2026, 03:25	9,477	-13
9 Aug 2026, 23:32	9,490	-12
6 Aug 2026, 10:16	9,502	no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47	9,502	first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

562 reactions across 29 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	230	40.9%
👍	166	29.5%
💔	36	6.41%
👀	24	4.27%
😭	24	4.27%
💯	23	4.09%
🌚	22	3.91%
😁	14	2.49%
❤‍🔥	6	1.07%
✍	5	0.89%
👏	5	0.89%
😐	2	0.356%
🥱	2	0.356%
🤔	1	0.178%
🤨	1	0.178%
🫡	1	0.178%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC473 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Photo

Social media is ultra-processed information, designed by people to trigger you, not to educate. Like ultra-processed food, it’s engineered for endless consumption, loaded with “flavor enhancers” — outrage, novelty, status, fear — that make you crave another bite. You don’t consume it because you’re hungry. You consume it because it was designed to make you hungry. And just like ultra-processed food, overconsumptio…

❤31👍12👏2

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

15 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

📖Possible Potentiating Effects of Combined Administration of Alcohol, Caffeine, and Nicotine on In Vivo Dopamine Release in Addiction-Related Circuits Within the CNS of Rats Biomedicines 2024 Nov 13;12(11):2591. Chronic caffeine exposure potentiates nicotine self-administration in rats Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Mar;142(4):327-33. Hypothesizing Music Intervention Enhances Brain Functional Connectivity Involving D…

❤1

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

15 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC524 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

The Sum of Pleasure. Walking through the city, I often notice a striking pattern: in sports betting and lottery kiosks, men sit holding a lottery ticket and a betting slip, with a lit cigarette in one hand and a cup of sweet coffee or a glass of alcohol in the other. It’s a perfect real-world example of what I call the sum of pleasure. 🫣This term describes the synergistic effect of combining multiple stimulants—both…

👍7❤4❤‍🔥2

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

13 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC504 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤7

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

13 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC481 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

How to lose a war. The anti-vaxxer movement in the United States is not simply an internal matter, but also a consequence of a lost information war. This war began in 2014 — in the form of an informational anti-vaccine attack by russian trolls and bots, inflating anti-vaxxer sentiments, undermining trust, and polarizing the discourse. According to research, these were millions of messages at a high frequency — on av…

❤8🌚1👍1

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

12 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC460 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

7. Be a missionary of your ideas, values, and beliefs. Tell people everywhere what you do and why you do not do certain things, and why they are important to you. Be a mentor, teach, spread, and plant the seeds of these ideas and values. https://belaveshkin.substack.com/p/see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no

👍8❤2

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

12 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC498 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Criticizing is easy and pleasant, especially when a person is wrong. Angry condemnation, public ridicule, and debunking propaganda, conspiracy theories, incorrect treatment methods, and misconceptions seem important and useful. But is that really so? Real facts and observations suggest the opposite. By ridiculing and criticizing, we spread harmful ideas and memes and make their supporters even more convinced of them.…

👍7❤3🫡1

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

10 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC750 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🤍 Hugs aren’t the only way to stimulate oxytocin ✓ Eye-to-eye contact ✓ Affectionate touch, massage & holding hands ✓ Warm social interaction ✓ Giving and receiving compliments ✓ Expressing gratitude ✓ Deep personal conversations ✓ Laughing and singing together ✓ Synchronized movement and shared activities ✓ Caring for others ✓ Interacting with babies and children ✓ Playing with dogs ✓ Looking at cute babies, puppies…

❤46

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

8 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC699 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Photo

Acceptance therapy. “Fate leads the willing and drags the unwilling.” — Seneca, Moral Letters to Lucilius, Letter 107 Ducunt volentem fata, nolentem trahunt. Author: Hugo Lederer. Title: Das Schicksal (“Fate”). Year: 1905.

❤13👍6🌚1

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

8 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC632 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Photo

Absurdity is a weapon. When you drag propaganda or lies into your feed “just to laugh at them” or to say, “Look at these idiots,” the idiots are you. The more absurd the lie, the more deeply it can hook you emotionally — and the more deeply you may remember it. You become the Trojan horse: spreading the lie yourself and reinforcing it with emotion. It doesn’t matter whether you laugh at it or hate it. You’re help…

👍11💯7❤2

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC719 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤5

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC719 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

If you pick up an ordinary lottery ticket, it looks harmless compared to injectable drugs — but it can cause comparable harm. People have long noticed the corrupting influence of gambling: Plato and Aristotle criticized gambling as a vice leading to loss of self-control. In the Sigalovada Sutta, gambling is named as one of the causes of a person's downfall and is viewed as an activity that intensifies greed, attachme…

❤18👍3

Signed Andrew Belaveshkin

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @beloveshkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Gonchar's Channel
@sgonchar · 605 posts Hack your depression
@hack_your_depression · 681 post НП 2.0 technical
@np20tech · 1861 post НП 2.0 technical (reserv)
@np20tech_re · 601 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Dr. Gavrylin
@dr_gavrylin · 1,2701 post Экспериментализм
@experimentalism · 361 post ДайджестВысшейШколы
@kmuksph · 3231 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,685
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026

Надя Андреева - нутрициолог об энергии
@shkolasvetlyachkov · 45,422
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026

Кулинарная медицина. Рецепты здоровья Кати Янг
@katya_young · 33,284
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

Юсипова - системная медицина!
@yusipovacom · 54,288
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Belaveshkin” (@beloveshkin), 9,368 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beloveshkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.