🎉 Когда AI заменил команду разработчиков и по скиллам и по бюджету.
😁17👍1

Channel
@ilia_agi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,504subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001935282023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilia_agi |
| Created | 25 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilia_agi |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 2,504 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 2,508 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 2,507 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 2,509 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 2,514 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 2,525 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 2,528 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,529 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,535 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 2,536 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,536 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
460 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 196 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 15.0% | |
| ❤ | 66 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 9.13% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 7.39% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 3.70% | |
| 👀 | 13 | 2.83% | |
| 🦄 | 10 | 2.17% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 1.52% | |
| 👾 | 6 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilia_agi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎉 Когда AI заменил команду разработчиков и по скиллам и по бюджету.
😁17👍1
Fable AGI модель снова вернули в строй - пример социального расслоения в обществе и AI. В будущем сверхумные модели будут доступны только премиальным пользователям с конкретным паспортом и лицензией. Так что наслаждаемся моментом свободного доступа, до 7 июля!
👍5❤3🤣1
💬 Сегодня утро началось с того, что один из агентов внезапно не смог запушить обновления в свой репозиторий. Сначала подумал: баг, токен, права, сеть... Но нет ! GitHub ночью просто снес мой аккаунт. Уровень факапа: — аккаунт с историей 13+ лет — 550+ репозиториев — несколько open-source проектов — 5 аккаунтов компаний — публичные package-репозитории — ежедневные коммиты, пайплайны, зависимости, интеграции Вот и …
🤬17👾6🦄5👍1
🤫 wtf. Антропик так долго предупреждал всех, что модели Fable и Mythos супер опасные, что правительство США запретила предоставлять к ним доступ. 🙈 Как итог: сегодня Anthropic заблокировал доступ к только что открытым моделям и написал публичное письмо. Они точно договорятся, но вот пока мы без Fable/Mythos опять(
👍2😁1
«Мы сейчас здесь» (c) Fable
😁18
🎉 Поздравляю всех с новыми моделями! Подписки сгорают теперь в два раза быстрее, ну и мощности моделей такие, что обычному потребителю и вайб-кодеру их особо и негде использовать
❤5🔥4
🔄 Y-Combinator (YC) еще раз подтверждают какие они крутые венчуры. Теперь при подаче в YC они хотят видеть как вы вайб-кодите!!! и не просто видеть, а анализировать биг дату, которую генерирует codex и claude code о вас пока вы прогаете очередной убыточный SAAS. Их сервис можно запустить и просто так, чтобы сделать самоанализ и понять как лучше сжигать вашу MAX подписку. Сам сервис называется PAXEL - https://paxel…
👀8❤5🔥3
💬 ИИ — это не интеллект. Это интеллектуальный протез. Он может дать вам доступ к знаниям хирурга. Но он не даст вам руки хирурга. Посадите рядом кардиохирурга и человека без медицинского образования. Дайте второму iPad с ChatGPT. Спросите обоих: «Как сделать пересадку сердца?» На словах оба могут звучать убедительно. Но когда включится свет в операционной — разница станет очевидной. И, возможно, смертельной. То …
❤18👍9🔥4
🏁 Почему AI-стартапы-прокладки не выживут, и не стоит зависить от ide, скилов или агентов! Я перепробовал почти всё: AI-агентов, OpenClaw, Hermes, Cursor, IDE-сервисы, «магические» тулзы и десятки обёрток поверх моделей, начиная с самой первой 2022 инфры под названием . Вывод простой: чем больше прослоек между тобой и моделью — тем меньше контроля, качества и понимания. Сегодня выигрывает не тот, кто купил очередн…
👍19🔥10❤4
💬 Если у тебя две жирные подписки на Claude Code и Codex и ты хотел бы, чтобы они вместе работали над задачами и workflow, рекомендую мой любимый Codex plugin-skill для Claude: https://github.com/openai/codex-plugin-cc Как работает у меня: Во всех пайплайнах клода есть задачи, которые клод оркестратор делегирует субагентам кодекса и те выполняют и возвращают свои задачи в основной поток. Codex+Claude хорошо работаю…
🔥10❤8👍2
🏁 Anthropic принял мою заявку на расширение прав для задач по Кибер Безопасности. Теперь у меня root права на Opus модель для поиска уязвимостей, расследования кибер преступлений и пентестов. У меня Claude Cyber Security Agent стоит на отдельной машине c полным обвесом Kali OS и честно говоря страшно смотреть, как агент проектирует свои атаки, детектит и эксплуатирует уязвимости в любой системе. Mythos просто нельз…
👍19🔥8👀5
OPUS 4.8 released 🏁 плюс лимиты сбросили.
🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ilia_agi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья AGI TV 🤖” (@ilia_agi), 2,504 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilia_agi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.