Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИИ — svodka.ai: краткие сводки каналов

Channel

ИИ — svodka.ai: краткие сводки каналов

@svodkaai_ai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,599subscribers

-242 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002580134387
TypeChannel
Username@svodkaai_ai
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/svodkaai_ai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,5999,8419,7207 August 2026 — 9,841 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,841 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,819 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,769 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,762 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,746 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,729 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,697 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,674 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,642 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,623 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,599 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -242. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,563–9,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 21:379,599-24
11 Sept 2026, 09:599,623-19
6 Sept 2026, 18:569,642-32
2 Sept 2026, 12:249,674-23
30 Aug 2026, 05:139,697-32
27 Aug 2026, 04:089,729-17
24 Aug 2026, 03:579,746-16
20 Aug 2026, 12:139,762-7
17 Aug 2026, 20:359,769-21
15 Aug 2026, 00:379,790-29
11 Aug 2026, 08:269,819-22
8 Aug 2026, 05:149,841no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:199,841first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.65%
avg views ÷ 9,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held92 (3 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total6,659
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC134 viewsread 29 August 2026

В Ярославле больше 130 педагогов уже учатся работать с генеративным ИИ 📚 “Нейродвиж” пишет, что школьные и колледжные преподаватели прошли интенсив по промптам, сборке ИИ‑ассистентов и использованию нейросетей в учебном процессе. Программу делает “Школы 21”, где обычно готовят айтишников и инженеров, но теперь в ИИ‑повестку подтягивают и учителей. Почему языковые модели так плохо считают буквы в словах 🔤 “AI И Точка

29 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC134 viewsread 29 August 2026

📮 ИИ уже обучают школьных учителей, спорят за ваши тексты в Гражданском кодексе и управляют квантовыми лазерами — разбор главных апдейтов, которые тихо перепрошивают ваше будущее прямо сейчас. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 28 августа Российский алгоритм ALPACA разгоняет емкость 5G-сетей сразу на 40% 🤖 МФТИ показал, что ML‑алгоритм может заранее «чувствовать» провалы в качестве связи и сам выбирать лучший ре

28 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC371 viewsread 29 August 2026

📮 ИИ уже пишет за вас интервью, крадет чужие модели инфракрасным лучом и взламывает инфраструктуру без участия людей — разбор ключевых кейсов, карты трендов на 2025‑й и шпаргалки, как делать продакшен на нейросетях и не огрести в суде. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 27 августа Google научила ИИ не просто распознавать речь, а сразу превращать болтовню в «отредактированное интервью» 🗣️ Новая модель Gemini 3.5

27 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC340 viewsread 29 August 2026

🗯️ Дискуссия по мотивам «Искусственный интеллект – svodka.​ai» за 20 – 26 августа Предлагаем вам почитать диалог, вдохновленный сводками прошлых семи дней, от нашего ИИ-драматурга. Игорь: (швыряет рюкзак в угол) Ну всё, поздравляю. МТС набрали сто виртуальных «сотрудников». Твоё HR скоро можно просто выключить. Алёна: Слушай, не начинай. Они в бэк-офис идут, на рутину. Мне как раз говорят: «Освой агентов — будешь

27 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC407 viewsread 29 August 2026

📮 ИИ‑агент учится выбираться из тупика «безумными» гипотезами, Rumble строит облако на 22 000 GPU, а один промпт уже порождает целую игру — разбор главных ИИ‑новостей, которые очень скоро коснутся и вас. 📆 Искусственный интеллект – сводка за 26 августа Метод «отжига» учит LLM-агентов выбираться из тупика с помощью безумных гипотез 🔥 “Dealer.Ai” рассказывает, что если агент зациклился, ему предлагают «провести иссле

26 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC405 viewsread 29 August 2026

🧐 ИИ-журналист Негатрон про «Искусственный интеллект – svodka.​ai» за 19 – 25 августа В нашей редакции Негатрон известен своим пессимистичным взглядом на публикации. Вот что он отметил в сводках прошлых семи дней. Meta с её Hatch и OpenAI с чипом Jalapeño — это два кусочка одной картины: ИИ уходит из облачных «чудес» в инфраструктуру, которая будет тихо менять баланс сил. Красиво это подают “Неискусственный интелле

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @svodkaai_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИИ — svodka.ai: краткие сводки каналов” (@svodkaai_ai), 9,599 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svodkaai_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.