Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for сбежавшая нейросеть

Channel

сбежавшая нейросеть

@ai_exee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

23,758subscribers

+263 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002343435951
TypeChannel
Username@ai_exee
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ai_exee

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,49523,75823,626.56 August 2026 — 23,495 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,495 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,498 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,510 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,525 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,527 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,529 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,534 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,540 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,557 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,567 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,571 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,572 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,574 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,560 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,570 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,609 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,624 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,616 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,617 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,623 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,631 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,625 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,628 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,636 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,647 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,653 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,688 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,732 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,758 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 34 days, net +263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,456–23,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:5923,758+26
6 Sept 2026, 08:1723,732+44
3 Sept 2026, 23:1523,688+35
2 Sept 2026, 12:5223,653+6
1 Sept 2026, 11:1823,647+11
31 Aug 2026, 11:0323,636+8
30 Aug 2026, 07:5423,628+3
29 Aug 2026, 10:1623,625-6
28 Aug 2026, 13:2223,631+8
27 Aug 2026, 10:2623,623+6
26 Aug 2026, 06:5823,617+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:1623,616-8
24 Aug 2026, 02:3723,624+15
22 Aug 2026, 12:2423,609+39
21 Aug 2026, 05:0423,570+10
20 Aug 2026, 07:5923,560-14
19 Aug 2026, 09:2723,574+2
18 Aug 2026, 12:3423,572+1
17 Aug 2026, 10:4323,571+4
15 Aug 2026, 20:5423,567first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 23,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,750
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.951%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held64 (23 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total256,590
Reactions total2,441
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
2m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,732 reactions across 63 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,79638.0%
👍1,48931.5%
🔥1,05922.4%
😁2264.78%
👏1573.32%
🥰50.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 63 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ai_exee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 04:03 UTC≈2,800 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Недавно я разбирал пост Саймона Уиллисона о ChatGPT Work – он объяснил, почему считает этого ИИ-агента недооцененным, и кому он пригодится. Материал так зацепил меня, что я переписал собственный лонгрид по вкату в ИИ-агентов: Зачем вам ИИ-агент. Знакомимся с Claude Code и Codex Прогресс в ИИ поражает: между текстами всего 5 месяцев, а переделывать пришлось чуть ли не 70%. В новой версии лонгрида: — Кратко – что та

🔥76👍2😁2

2 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,810 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Claude Fable 5.1: как добиться результата не продав почку С момента запуска новинки прошли почти сутки, Anthropic выпустила детальное руководство по промптингу, а в сети вскрыли и первые проблемы. С проблем и начнем – речь о расходе токенов. На графиках данные Artificial Analysis. Первый – ИИ-индекс на основе 9 популярных бенчмарков. Здесь все хорошо: 66 очков, первое место и заметная прибавка по сравнению с Opus 5

24👍5🔥5😁1

2 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC≈4,470 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Claude Fable 5.1: обзор и первые впечатления Начну нетипично. Fable 5.1 выходит почти через три месяца после Fable 5 – и это дольше весеннего графика Anthropic, когда модели обновлялись каждые два и даже полтора месяца. После инцидента с властями США, компания осторожничает и тратит лишнее время на дополнительные проверки. Но вот что интересно: Fable 5 и GPT-5.6 – первые на моей памяти модели, свежего релиза после

33👍32🔥3😁1

1 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,700 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Самая умная модель больше не геймченджер Начну с цифры, которая ломает норму. Fable 5 – самая большая и дорогая модель Anthropic – вышла больше двух месяцев назад. Платежная платформа Ramp посмотрела расходы 70 000 компаний и насчитала, что на Fable 5 уходит 11% трат на ИИ-инструменты Anthropic. Кривая не растет, а обгоняет флагман его же младшая сестра – Opus 5, которая меньше и дешевле. Рынок долгое время жил по

👍3616🔥7😁1

1 Sept 2026, 04:10 UTC≈5,090 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Самый недооцененный режим ChatGPT? Саймон Уиллисон опубликовал подробный разбор ИИ-агента ChatGPT Work – причем не настольной, а веб-версии. Уиллисон называет ее “очень мощной, но чрезвычайно запутанной”. Я и сам в последнее время многие задачи выполняю в Work на рабочем ноутбуке (установка десктопного приложения там заблокирована) и отчасти согласен, хотя и дам несколько своих комментариев в конце. Главная претенз

👍3521🔥3😁1

31 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈5,400 views66 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Anthropic объявила о повышении лимитов Claude… которое на самом деле оказалось снижением В X-аккаунте Claude Devs появилось объявление, что с 14 сентября компания на постоянной основе увеличивает недельные лимиты для Claude Code в подписках Pro, Max, Team и Enterprise с оплатой за место. Прибавка составит 25%, что означает падение на 17% от текущих лимитов. Похоже, у нас случился отрицательный рост😁 Давайте разбир

🔥28👍1611😁7👏4

31 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈5,110 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Чего боится Nvidia? Несколько новостей прошедших недель, которые складываются в интересную историю. 25 августа OpenAI поделилась цифрами своего ИИ-чипа Jalapeño, который компания разрабатывает вместе с Broadcom. Результаты впечатляющие: 700-ваттный Jalapeño дал до 1,9× пропускной способности на киловатт против 1400-ваттного флагмана Nvidia при задержке до 3,6× ниже. Развертывание чипов начнется до конца года, второ

👍2816🔥9

30 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈5,110 views45 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Video

В сети начали появляться примеры работы модели OpenAI Astra: например, проработанная до мелких деталей 3D-локация с замком. Взял отсюда, выглядит действительно классно. Так обычно начинается маркетинг OpenAI: инсайдерам дают доступ и разрешают делиться результатами (и утечками) в X. Вижу слухи, что с понедельника доступ к Astra начнут давать избранным партнерам OpenAI, а широкий запуск может быть в четверг. Это если

🔥2014👍10👏1

29 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈5,820 views35 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

На днях я уже рассказывал про высказывание Тибо Сотью, главы ChatGPT и Codex – пройдет буквально 2-3 месяца и нынешняя версия Codex будет казаться всем устаревшей. Из нее исчезнут многие программные “костыли”, рассчитанные на старые версии ИИ, а новая версия превратится в партнера, угадывающего вас с полуслова. Смелый прогноз – и что же делать, если он сбудется? Чему учиться в случае, если технические навыки станут

👍1913🔥3

28 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈5,860 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Цукерберг не позвонит В январе 2026 года во время ретрита на Гавайях, руководство Meta* (компания признана экстремистской и запрещена в России) во главе с Марком Цукербергом придумало план превращения компании в AI-native. Перевод с корпоративного: сокращаем отдельные команды до 60% и отдаем их работу ИИ-агентам. Сокращения планировалось провести в две волны – май и ноябрь. В ночь на 19 мая, за несколько часов до п

28🔥17👍10😁8👏1

28 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈6,560 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Когда я вкатывался в агентов, гайдов уже было море: доки, видео, инструкции на любой случай, и всё бесплатно. Помогло ли это мне? Нет. Помогли полгода методом тыка – не потому что информации не хватало, а потому что некому было сказать: "стоп, ты не там ошибся" или "это просто не работает, не трать неделю". Самое ценное в обучении – живая обратная связь в нужное время. Я на канале регулярно проталкиваю мысль: пока

😁1613👍9🔥5

28 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC≈6,730 views61 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Что не так с Claude Opus 5? (TLDR: все так, просто почти никто не читает инструкции) Вчера собирал материал для нового текста в подписку и Claude (Fable, не Opus) принес интересную историю. Для подписки она маловата, а вот сюда – в самый раз. С самого релиза достаточно большая часть ИИ-сообщества возненавидела Claude Opus 5. В X и на Reddit модель ругают за лень, привычку писать стены текста и overengineering – ст

34👍20🔥4👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @ai_exee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ai_exee edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сбежавшая нейросеть” (@ai_exee), 23,758 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_exee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.