Channel
@designera_space
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,628subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001907668743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @designera_space |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/designera_space |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 2,628 | +8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 2,620 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,622 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 2,624 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 2,622 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 2,616 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 2,612 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 2,611 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 2,608 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 2,595 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,594 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 2,594 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
131 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 63.4% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 7.63% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▪️ عنوان مقاله: The Growth Design Playbook ▪️ توضیحات: این مقاله توضیح میدهد که طراحان محصول چگونه میتوانند با استفاده از دادهها، تست A/B و تحلیل رفتار کاربران، طراحیهایی خلق کنند که مستقیماً روی رشد محصول و افزایش نرخ تبدیل تأثیر بگذارند. 🔗 https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/growth-design ◎ کانال دیزاینرا
❤2👎1
📚 مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: The UX Designer’s Nightmare: When “Production-Ready” Becomes A Design Deliverable ▪️ توضیحات: درباره تغییر نقش Product Designer: آیا طراح باید کد هم بنویسد؟ مرز بین Design و Engineering کجاست؟ آیا این تغییر به نفع کیفیت محصول است؟ 🔗 مطالعه مقاله #مقالات #UI #UX ◎ کانال دیزاینرا
❤4
▪️ نام پلاگین: CleanUp Layers ▪️ توضیحات: پلاگین CleanUp Layers فایل فیگماتون رو فوری تمیز، منظم و هوشمندانه تغییر نام میده. با ابزار «اسکنر یککلیکی فایل و امتیاز سلامت»، فریم انتخابشده یا کل صفحه رو بررسی میکنه و نمای کلی از «امتیاز سلامت» فایل نشون میده؛ همراه با جزئیات تعداد کل لایهها، لایههای مخفی، المانهای قفلشده و فریمهایی با نام پیشفرض. بعد میتونید لایهها رو با ۴ روش نامگذاری مختلف بهصورت خود…
❤6👍1
📌 در این وبینار، سوده محمدآبادی، طراح محصول و خدمات، درباره یکی از مهمترین موضوعات دنیای امروز فناوری یعنی «طراحی محصولات قابل اعتماد هوش مصنوعی» صحبت کرد. در طول این جلسه، ابعاد مختلف اعتماد در محصولات مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی بررسی شد و چالشها، فرصتها و راهکارهای عملی طراحی تجربههای هوش مصنوعی قابل اعتماد مورد بحث قرار گرفت. بخش اول: نقش و ابزارهای جدید طراح محصول در عصر هوش مصنوعی بررسی شد. بخش دوم: اهمیت اعتماد ب…
❤7👍1🔥1
📚 مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: The Bottleneck Isn’t Building. It’s Deciding. ▪️ توضیحات: این مقاله توضیح میدهد که با پیشرفت هوش مصنوعی، ساختن محصول دیگر بزرگترین چالش تیمها نیست؛ بلکه تصمیمگیری است. نویسنده معتقد است بسیاری از ایدههای خوب در جلسات، فرآیندهای تأیید و هماهنگی بین تیمها متوقف میشوند. به جای اسلاید و جلسات طولانی، پیشنهاد میکند از پروتوتایپهای واقعی برای گرفتن تصمیمهای سریعتر و دقیقتر استفاده شود…
❤5👍1
📚 مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: UX/UI Design Trends in 2026: What Is Actually Changing and Why It Matters ▪️ توضیحات: یکی از بهترین مقالهها برای جدا کردن ترندهای واقعی از ترندهای تبلیغاتی. 🔗 مطالعه مقاله #مقالات #UI #UX ◎ کانال دیزاینرا
❤8
☑️ فایل ارایه وبینار : طراحی محصولات قابل اعتماد هوش مصنوعی 🎙سخنران: سوده محمدآبادی (طراح محصول و خدمات) 🗓 تاریخ ارایه: ۲۹ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵ | کامیونیتی دیزاینرها 💻مناسب برای سطح: junior, mid-level شامل: 🟡بخش اول: نقش و ابزارهای جدید طراح محصول در عصر هوش مصنوعی 🟡بخش دوم: چرا اعتماد مهمترین مزیت رقابتی محصولات AI است؟ 🟡بخش سوم: طراحی تجربه کاربری در شرایط عدم قطعیت 🟡بخش چهارم: شفافیت، اعتبارسنجی و تست محصولات AI در دنیای…
❤14👍3🔥1
🎙 وبینار طراحی محصولات قابل اعتماد هوش مصنوعی شروع شد. لینک ورود به وبینار
📚 مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: Dark Patterns in UX: Understanding and Avoiding Deceptive Design ▪️ توضیحات: این مقاله به بررسی «Dark Pattern»ها یا الگوهای فریبنده در طراحی UX میپردازد؛ تکنیکهایی که کاربران را به انجام اقداماتی که قصدشان را ندارند سوق میدهند. مقاله با مثالهای واقعی نشان میدهد چگونه برخی تصمیمات طراحی میتوانند اعتماد کاربران را از بین ببرند و چرا طراحی اخلاقمحور در بلندمدت به نفع محصول و کسبوکار اس…
❤3
� مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: سوگیریهای شناختی که هر طراح UX باید بشناسد ▪️ توضیحات: چرا کاربران همیشه منطقی تصمیم نمیگیرند؟ این مقاله با معرفی مهمترین Cognitive Biasها مثل Anchoring، Loss Aversion و Peak-End Rule نشان میدهد چطور شناخت روانشناسی کاربر به طراحی تجربههای بهتر کمک میکند. 🔗 مطالعه مقاله ◎ کانال دیزاینرا
❤6
در این وبینار سوده محمدآبادی (طراح محصول و خدمات)، در مورد موضوع کلیدی و حیاتی «طراحی محصولات قابل اعتماد هوش مصنوعی» صحبت خواهد کرد.این وبینار در پنج بخش تخصصی طراحی شده تا شما را با چالشها و راهکارهای عملی در طراحی محصولات قابل اعتماد هوش مصنوعی آشنا کند. 🎯 مخاطبین اصلی: این وبینار فراتر از دنیای دیزاینرهاست؛ ما از تمام مدیران محصول، توسعهدهندگان، طراحان خدمات و پژوهشگران تجربه کاربر دعوت میکنیم تا در کنار هم ی…
❤16🔥2👍1
📚 مقالات ▪️ عنوان مقاله: ?Product design in 2026: the beginning of a fantastic voyage ▪️ توضیحات:نقش جدید Product Designer در عصر AI و اینکه طراحان دیگر فقط سازنده UI نیستند، بلکه تصمیمگیرنده محصول هستند. 🔗 مطالعه مقاله #مقالات #UI #UX ◎ کانال دیزاینرا
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @designera_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Designera Channel - کانال دیزاینرا” (@designera_space), 2,628 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designera_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.