Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UXBook

Channel

UXBook

@uxbook

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,114subscribers

+293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001018329619
TypeChannel
Username@uxbook
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/uxbook

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,8213,1142,967.56 August 2026 — 2,821 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,848 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,933 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,022 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,068 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,085 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,094 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,110 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,114 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,777–3,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 13:173,114+4
4 Sept 2026, 09:163,110+9
31 Aug 2026, 11:163,101+7
28 Aug 2026, 02:243,094+9
25 Aug 2026, 07:263,085+17
22 Aug 2026, 15:273,068+24
18 Aug 2026, 22:363,044+22
16 Aug 2026, 06:193,022+89
12 Aug 2026, 18:432,933+29
10 Aug 2026, 00:422,904+56
7 Aug 2026, 11:122,848+27
6 Aug 2026, 20:152,821first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 39s
Average length
2m 20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9052.6%
🔥2715.8%
👍2514.6%
🙏2112.3%
😍52.92%
👏31.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC750 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قالب ‌های رایگان UX Research از (GB) Lee مدیر طراحی شرکت Atlassian! آقای Geunbae (GB) Lee یکی از شناخته ‌شده‌ترین طراحان محصول دنیاست. امروز به‌عنوان Director of Product Design در تیم Growth شرکت Atlassian فعالیت می‌کنه و قبل از اون هم در شرکت‌هایی مثل Meta (Facebook) و Statsig مشغول به کار بوده. این مجموعه شامل Templateهایی هست که آقای Lee در پروژه‌ های واقعی استفاده کرده: ✅ Persona Template ✅ Journey Map Templat

8👍1

3 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC916 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تا حالا شده چند ساعت مشغول طراحی یا یادگیری باشی، ولی آخر روز حس کنی پیشرفت خاصی نداشتی؟ مشکل از کمبود زمان نیست، از نوع کار کردنمونه. متخصص ‌هایی مثل Andrew Huberman میگن برای کارهای عمیق، مغز بیشتر از اینکه به زمان زیاد نیاز داشته باشه، به تمرکز بدون حواس ‌پرتی نیاز داره. من هم بعد از آشنایی با مفهوم Deep Work، کم‌کم روش خودم رو ساختم. اشتباه رایج خیلی از طراح‌ها اینه که ساعت ‌ها آموزش می‌بینن، صدها طرح ذخیره می‌

👍4🙏2

1 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC824 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

AI دیگه فقط رنگ‌ها رو حفظ نمی‌کنه، منطق طراحی رو هم می‌فهمه! اگه با Design System و Design Token ها کار کرده باشید، احتمالاً می‌دونید AI فقط متغیرهایی مثل primary-500 رو می‌بینه و دلیل استفاده از اون‌ها رو متوجه نمی‌شه. ابزار DESIGN.md دقیقاً برای حل همین مشکل معرفی شده. یک فایل متنی که کنار Design System قرار می‌گیره و علاوه بر مقادیر فنی، منطق طراحی، قوانین استفاده و تصمیم‌های تیم طراحی رو هم به AI منتقل می‌کنه.

👍42🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📘 معرفی و دانلود #کتاب Solving Product Design Exercises سخت ‌ترین بخش مسیر یک طراح، فاصله بین «یاد گرفتن» و «استخدام شدنه». خیلی‌ها Figma بلدن، UI طراحی می‌کنن، اما وقتی وارد مصاحبه میشن، نمی‌تونن مسئله رو تحلیل کنن یا از تصمیم‌ های طراحی‌شون دفاع کنن. برای همین همیشه کتاب Solving Product Design Exercises رو به طراح‌های سطح Growing پیشنهاد می‌کنیم.( اگه هنوز مشاوره آموزشی نگرفتید، به @samyuxd پیام بدید) کتاب بر اس

🙏32

27 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,310 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 هنوز برای طراحی هر صفحه ساعت‌ها وقت می‌ذاری و همه‌چیز رو از صفر می‌سازی؟ این روزها ابزارهای Vibe Designing دارن روش کار طراح‌ها رو تغییر میدن. اما Vibe Designing یعنی چی؟ یعنی به ‌جای اینکه همه‌چیز رو دستی و از صفر بسازی، ایده یا نیازت رو به ابزار میدی و با کمک AI، خیلی سریع به یک خروجی اولیه، وایرفریم، UI یا Prototype می‌رسی. البته این ابزارها قرار نیست جای طراح رو بگیرن! ارزش اصلی‌شون اینه که کارهای تکراری و ز

6👍3

25 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,520 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 بوتکمپ کارآموزی طراحی محصول | مرداد ماه من همیشه بیشترین نتیجه رو از طراح هایی دیدم که فقط آموزش ندیدن؛ بلکه وارد یک پروژه شدن، طراحی کردن، اشتباه کردن، فیدبک گرفتن و دوباره بهتر طراحی کردن. برای همین چندین ساله سیستم منتورینگ خودم رو بر پایه کار عملی و بازخورد مستمر اجرا می‌کنم. حالا به‌دلیل هزینه بالای منتورینگ فردی، تصمیم گرفتم این تجربه رو به‌صورت گروهی و با یک‌ چهارم هزینه منتورینگ فردی برگزار کنم. در این ب

9👍2

24 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,030 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @UXDNotesVideo

پیشنهاد میکنم مستند Abstract: The Art of Design رو حتما ببیند! دو فصل داره و هر قسمت میره سراغ یه دیزاینر بزرگ. تو اپیزود Ian Spalter (هد دیزاین اینستاگرام) میبینی تغییر یه تب ساده چقدر تحقیق و تست میخواد. یعنی دیزاین یه تصمیم استراتژیکه، نه یه قاب خوشکل. بعدش Tinker Hatfield طراح نایکی نشون میده چطور محدودیت ها باعث خلاقیت میشن. این یعنی همون چالش هر روز ما با بودجه و تکنولوژی. و Bjarke Ingelse معمار دانمارکی که

18

22 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,040 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

موقعیت شغلی | طراح UX/UI دورکاری (Junior) در یکی از استارتاپ‌ هایی که به‌عنوان منتور طراحی محصول و جذب نیرو باهاشون همکاری دارم، در حال تکمیل تیم محصول هستیم و دنبال اولین طراح UX/UI تیم می‌گردیم. این استارتاپ در حال ساخت یک فروشگاه آنلاین جامع برای خرید محصولاتی مثل مواد غذایی، محصولات بهداشتی، آرایشی و عطر است. چون این اولین جایگاه تخصصی طراحی محصول در تیمه، این فرصت می‌تونه برای یک طراح Junior که دنبال رشد واقع

🔥5🙏21👍1

20 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,490 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

این روزها محتوا درباره طراحی کم نیست، اما محتوایی که واقعاً ارزش وقت گذاشتن داشته باشه، کمتر پیدا می‌شه. به تازگی پادکست Design Notes by Mohi توسط همکار گرامی جناب Mohi Eliyasi کارش رو شروع کرده و ایده جالبی رو دنبال می‌کنه. توی این پادکست، کتاب‌های مهم طراحی محصول، UX و UI به زبان ساده روایت می‌شن؛ نه صرفاً خلاصه کتاب، بلکه با تمرکز روی ایده‌هایی که میتونن توی پروژه‌ های واقعی به کارمون بیان. اگر طراحی می‌کنید، یا

5👍2😍1

18 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,120 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @UXDNotesPhoto

بیشتر طراح‌هایی که برای مشاوره یا منتورینگ باهاشون در ارتباطم، مسیر مشابهی رو طی کردن. با انگیزه وارد UX/UI شدن؛ دوره خریدن، ویدیو دیدن، مقاله خوندن، تمرین کردن و با Figma و ابزارهای AI کار کردن. اما موقع ورود به بازار کار گیر کردن: حالا باید چی کار کنم؟ چطور وارد بازار کار بشم؟ چطور پروژه بگیرم؟ چطور از این همه یادگیری به درآمد برسم؟ ... اینجاست که یک مشکل بزرگ مشخص میشه: جونیورها اطلاعات زیادی دارن، اما تجربه کاف

👍4🔥3

17 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @UXDNotesPhoto

#مستند «Design & Thinking» محصول 2012 ، از اون مستندهاییه که بدون ذره‌ای شوآف، میره سر اصل مطلب: طراحی فقط در مورد UI اپ و وب‌ سایت نیست، طراحی درباره چطور کار کردن همه چیز هست، یه جور طرز فکره برای حل مسئله. تو این مستند خبری از پیکسل و فیگما نیست. در عوض می‌بینی چطور آدمای پشت صحنهٔ نوآوری، با فرایند «تفکر طراحی» میرن سراغ گره‌های کور اجتماعی و فرهنگی. از آشپزخونهٔ ایده‌ها گرفته تا مصاحبه با بزرگان این صنعت، هم

🙏4😍21

15 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,420 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎯 6 سایت برای انجام چالش‌های UI/UX | مناسب طراح‌های سطح #Growing توی مشاوره‌های آموزشی رایگان، طراح‌ها رو در یکی از این سه سطح زیر قرار میدیم: 🌱 Starter 🚀 Growing 💼 Experienced یکی از مهم‌ ترین پیشنهادهای ما به بچه‌های سطح Growing اینه که حتماً وارد چالش ‌های طراحی بشن. از این مرحله به بعد، فقط دیدن دوره یا خوندن کتاب کافی نیست. باید هر روز با یک مسئله واقعی روبه‌رو بشی، تصمیم بگیری، طراحی کنی و اشتباه کنی. دقیق

🔥8🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uxbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTCAnonymous Poll121 voters

لطفاً به گزینه های مورد نظرتون رأی بدین.

  1. همکاری با تیم فنی: زبان مشترک طراح و دولوپر29%
  2. ردفلگ‌ های استارتاپی و سازمانی برای طراحان21%
  3. تحلیل داده و متریک: تبدیل عدد به بینش26%
  4. غلبه بر وسواس و کمال‌ گرایی در طراحی32%
  5. برندسازی شخصی و داستان‌ سرایی41%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

لطفا به گزینه مورد نظرتون رای بدید.

  1. تحلیل محصولات و Benchmark25%
  2. مصاحبه‌های استخدامی UX/UI50%
  3. اشتباهات رایج و راه حل ها21%
  4. طراحی Design System32%
  5. فریلنسری یا استخدام؟24%

The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UI/UX Tutorial
@uigraphic · 34,632
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
ایمان سرورپور | روان درمانگر
@imansarvarpour_masir_academy · 50,991
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Telegram Designers
@designers · 71,633
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
پادکست جافِكری
@jafekri · 40,967
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
خانه فریلنسرهای ماهر | دورکاری
@FreelancerH · 29,301
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
گفت و چای | فهیم عطار
@fahimattar · 42,971
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UXBook” (@uxbook), 3,114 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uxbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.