Channel
@artwithaim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,262subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001417754610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artwithaim |
| Created | 16 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artwithaim |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 3,262 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 3,266 | -10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 3,276 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:46 | 3,270 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,266 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 3,264 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 3,254 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 3,257 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 3,252 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 3,248 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 3,242 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 3,243 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 3,243 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 31 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 22.3% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 10.6% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 6.38% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.19% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My Etsy store (2018) was banned without explanation & conveniently without customer service you can contact. With days of reading through Reddit threads I found a number I could call to get a human after getting through the A.I. who answers the call… the human was not pleasant and immediately disconnected me (by accident I’m sure)… when I called back, the message was really dystopian & told me that I violated their r…
Russia: Poultry Registration now Mandatory Owners of more than 10 birds must now register their flocks with the state by 1-Sep. (< 10 birds , you have until 2029...) The state wants to know who has the food. Combine this with the drone surveillance mentioned in my last post, and we see that enforcement of the total technocratic takeover of food is going live... source: svoefermerstvo.ru
🤨1
1889 :) Vaccination proven useless/dangerous. Thank you Olga. T.me/ArtWithAim
🔥2
And yet so few Americans connect the dots that there is an intentional agenda to destroy us on literally every single level. T.me/ArtWithAim
🤮2💯1
An exploration of historical power structures, influence, and the narratives that have shaped different societies over time. Speaker: Fritz Springmeier T.me/ArtWithAim
💯2
We aren’t angry enough. And so many people are completely unconscious to the fact that they are intentionally killing us from every direction. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND NATURE! T.me/ArtWithAim
❤1💯1😱1
"The Rothschilds are controlled by the Wallenberg family, or one of the few families truly at the top of the pyramid. Ericsson, in the hands of the Wallenbergs, controlled telecommunication lines and infrastructure around the world, especially in China, Russia and the United States, from the 1890s. Since then, banks have become completely dependent on telecommunications and their almost instantaneous payment infrast…
🤔1
"Today, 99% of financial transactions are carried out electronically. Controlling the telecommunications infrastructure means controlling not only the payment infrastructure, but also the entire flow of information. And all this control is exercised by Ericsson and ABB, working hand in hand, both under the control of the company Investor, founded by the Wallenberg family in 1916, and under their exclusive control. Th…
The horrors endured by Slavic nations at the hands of the central banking cult, who are installing the technological, anti-human, SMART, biometric, digital surveillance track and trace, cashless prison system around the entire world... AKA the NWO, the Agenda 2030, WEF global plan.... must NEVER be overlooked, forgotten, twisted or misunderstood. Russians deserve intense empathy, compassion and respect for all that t…
🔥5🙏2
How Rothschild & Kissinger Put Putin in Power. DoD Planned This War With Russia Long Ago. We need to unite across the world.... that is the whole point for everything I do. -Airika #Kissinger #Putin #Russia #NWO #DigitalID #Cashless #Biometrics T.me/ArtWithAim
🔥3
I value watching dot connecting videos like this.... I added my own dots on the end. -Air #TrumpCard #Trump #Elections #Biometrics #DigitalID #Chabad #Russia #MoneyTrail T.me/ArtWithAim
🔥2👍1
Yuval Harari, a Israeli Professor, author and advisor to Klaus Schwab of WEF speaks about AI making all future decisions worldwide... not humans. He goes on to explain that there is nothing special about human creativity. These people need to be condemned and locked up for being psychopathically anti-human. They are justifying enslavement and mass murder as if it's merely philosophical. #WEF #NWO #digitalID #AI #Ar…
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @artwithaim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Art With Aim” (@artwithaim), 3,262 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artwithaim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.