📌(تدليس الحركيين على الناس في ثناء العلامة ابن باز عليهم) -https://youtu.be/ZlD5Ybc41yk?si=rmyx0X7Jmi0PMuFz -https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3ayyeRFSRXmjuBvYdrD_INTiPVCYslw-&si=zAZa9xHYAW7d9K8F ------- 📌 كشف فرية ثناء العلامة ابن باز على الحركيين كعوض القرني .. https://youtu.be/0LvMT3r30jA?si=mWMzrKe-t2RMgtJc 🎙 د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس

Channel
فوائد د.عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس
@AbdulazizAlRayes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,719subscribers
+483 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008394501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AbdulazizAlRayes |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AbdulazizAlRayes |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:07 | 15,719 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:45 | 15,726 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:55 | 15,732 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 15,733 | +6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 15,727 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 15,730 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 15,732 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 15,735 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 15,733 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 15,732 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 15,727 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 15,726 | +11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:26 | 15,715 | +10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 15,705 | +9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 15,696 | +50 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 15,646 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 15,641 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 15,645 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 15,644 | +11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 15,633 | first reading |
Engagement
199 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.22%
- avg views ÷ 15,719 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,140
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 199 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 199 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 53,373 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 38m
- Average length
- 2m 47s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 47 posts held from the last 30 days (6.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌 مسائل في اللعن 🔉 [https://youtu.be/TMqia0esZeA] ✍🏻 د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس ═══ ¤❁✿❁¤ ══ 🔹 قناة الشيخ/ د. عبدالعزيز الريس على التلجرام 👇 t.me/AbdulazizAlRayes 📩 قناة الشيخ/ د. عبدالعزيز الريس على الواتساب 👇 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaXwa1u2f3ELey4IH93F
💡 يقول السائل: عندنا في الصومال عادةٌ قديمة، وهي: المرأة المتوفى عنها زوجها إذا أكملت مدة العدة أربعة أشهر وعشرًا يصنعون وليمةً ويذبحون ذبائح يُقسَم للأقارب والجيران، فما حكمها الشرعي؟ . 📄 الجواب: قد أفاد شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية كما في كتابه (الاقتضاء) أنه لا أحد يفعل فعلًا ويُخصِّص فعلًا بمُخصِّص إلا لدافِع، ومثل هؤلاء إن كان دافِعُهم تعبُّديًّا كما هو الغالب في مثل هذا، فإنَّ مثل هذا بدعةٌ ولا تجوز، كما أنَّ بعض الن…
💡 يقول السائل: عندنا في الصومال عادةٌ قديمة، وهي: المرأة المتوفى عنها زوجها إذا أكملت مدة العدة أربعة أشهر وعشرًا يصنعون وليمةً ويذبحون ذبائح يُقسَم للأقارب والجيران، فما حكمها الشرعي؟ https://www.islamancient.com/?p=42619 ✍️ د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس
📌 كفى إجمالات في الاعتقاد ! 📹 https://youtu.be/PRLnpoEfRTA ✍🏻 د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس
🌟 إذا كان رسول الله يداري فكيف بغيره ؟ || د. عبد العزيز بن ريس الريس
📌 العلامة صالح الفوزان: السلف ما تركوا أهل البدع فضحوهم وردوا عليهم ...
File, posted without a caption
📌 [ سلسلة اللقاءات الحوارية ] 🔸 اللقاء (69) — النواصب الجدد وتأثير طه الدليمي (ج1) — ▶️ يوتيوب: [https://youtu.be/25pO_UKiKl0] 🌐 الموقع: [https://www.islamancient.com/?p=42769] 🎙 د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس . . . . . 🗒 فهرس المادة: 00:00 كلمة (النواصب الجدد وتأثير طه الدليمي) 22:58 من عنده علم كيف يرد على النواصب؟ 23:48 كيف نحاجج الناصبية بالإجماعات و بفهم السلف؟ 24:52 السؤال عن الرد على اهل البدع بالم…
🌟 لا تطل الجلوس مع من مل وسئم || د. عبد العزيز بن ريس الريس
File, posted without a caption
🔴 « هل الأصل في المسلم السلفية ؟! » 🎙 د. عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس ▶️ يوتيوب: [https://youtu.be/qytOIcA_EJE] 🌐 الموقع: [https://www.islamancient.com/?p=42760]
Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @AbdulazizAlRayes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AbdulazizAlRayes edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @AbdulazizAlRayes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 29 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 30 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@kanzalmaarifa · 1403 postsSheikh Alii Zinaab (Abul Hasan) - الشيخ علي زناب (أبو الحسن)
@SheikhAliZinab · 1822 postsالمحجة البيضاء
@Taeboon · 39,9732 postsقناة ومدرسة {أبى الفردوس علي مولا منغشا السلفي }
@abulterdewusl · 7532 postsدحض الخوارج(القناة الثانية)
@kdnnls · 4442 postsطه خضر أبوعبد الله
@tahakedirabuabdillah · 7,6232 postsIbnu Munewor (ኢብኑ ሙነወር)
@IbnuMunewor · 110,1521 postمَنابرُ السُّنَّة 📖
@Manaber_AlSunnah · 1571 postبيان حال المنحرفين 📍
@al_salaf_chanel · 1161 postالمُسْتَرَاح🇸🇦
@almostarah · 2151 postد. عبد العزيز بن ريس الريس | فارسی
@dr_alraies · 691 postقوت القلوب 🌿
@husujjw · 19,3861 postMuhammed Sultan (أبو عائشة) Channel
@ibnusultan38 · 2,4571 postНυѕѕυ тнєσℓσgу ѕтυ∂єит ⛉
@iwnetlehullu1 · 6,8631 postضلالات جماعة التبليغ
@thblgjmth · 5791 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Sualruhaily · 63,256
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@Drsalehs · 41,518
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
@sohaymi · 34,443
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
@khizana_62 · 22,435
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
@Ida3t_taleb_al3elme · 52,672
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@drosalmadina · 124,786
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
@mohaymid · 24,166
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
@alosimichannel · 24,098
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
@binbaz1420 · 32,108
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
@aqedamenhag · 66,489
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
@ahmed19871111 · 28,068
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@bawbttalib · 34,126
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
@hat2222 · 20,548
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 September 2026
@Dralshwiar12 · 33,581
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوائد د.عبدالعزيز بن ريس الريس” (@AbdulazizAlRayes), 15,719 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbdulazizAlRayes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.