Channel
@Abiat7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,242subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001509703956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Abiat7 |
| Description | نختارُ لكم أفضلَ الأبياتِ، نترك لكم أثرًا يُثري الذائقة |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Abiat7 |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 18,242 | +10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:28 | 18,232 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 18,234 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:21 | 18,230 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:21 | 18,227 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:49 | 18,232 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:59 | 18,234 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 18,238 | +6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 18,232 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 18,231 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 18,229 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 18,233 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 18,231 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 18,226 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 18,222 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 18,218 | +5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 18,213 | +5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 18,208 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 18,212 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 18,215 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (5 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 41,930 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Abiat7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
هَوِّنِ الأَمرَ تَعِش في راحَةٍ كُلَّ ما هَوَّنَت إِلّا سَيَهونُ لَيسَ أَمرُ المَرءِ سَهلًا كُلّهُ إِنَّما الأَمرُ سَهولٌ وَحَزونُ تَطلُبُ الراحَةَ في دارِ العَنا خابَ مِن يَطلُبُ شَيئًا لا يَكونُ
فَإِنَّ الصَبا ريحٌ إِذا ما تَنَسَّمَت عَلى نَفسِ مَحزونٍ تَجَلَّت هُمومُها تَذَكَّرتُ مِنْهَا بِالعَشِيَّاتِ والضُحَى لَذَاذَةَ دُنْيًا قَد تَوَلَّى نَعِيمُهَا
ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿًﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ مَا ﺃﻧﺖَ ﻗﺎﺿﻴﻪِ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﻠﺒﻲَ ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻪِ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪِ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺏّ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﻥِ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓٌ ﻓﺒﺎﻋﺪِ ﺍﻟﺤﺰﻥَ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻠﺒﻲ ﻭﺁﻭﻳﻪِ
ارفق بنفسكَ لا تجرح تصبّرها قد كادَ يكفي منَ الأيّامِ ما طحنت
وإنَّ انفرادَ المَرءِ في كلِّ مَشهَدٍ لَخَيرٌ مِنِ استِصحَابِ مَن لا يُلائِمُه
وَإِذا عَزَمتَ فَكُن بِنَفسِكَ وَاثِقًا فَالمُستَعِزُّ بِغَيرِهِ لا يَظفَرُ
إِذا المَرءُ لَم يَبنِ اِفتِخارًا لِنَفسِهِ تَضايَقَ عَنهُ ما اِبتَنَتهُ جُدودُه وَلا خَيرَ في مَن لا يَكونُ طَريفُهُ دَليلاً عَلى ما شادَ قِدما تَليدهُ
وَلَقَد صَحِبتُ الدَهرَ صُحبَةَ عارِفٍ مَتَعَوِّدٍ لِصَلاحِهِ وَفَسادِهِ وَخَبَرتُهُ فَرَأَيتُ ذَنبي عِندَهُ فَضلي وَأَعجَزَني دَواءُ عِنادَهُ وَمِنَ البَلِيَّةِ أَن تُداوى حِقدَ مَن نِعَمُ الإِله عَلَيكَ مِن أَحقادِهِ
مَا زِلْتُ أُبْصِرُ حَبْلَ الدَّهْرِ أَرْقُبُهُ حَتَّى فَنَيْتُ وَحَبْلُ الدَّهْرِ مَمْدُودُ أُقَدِّمُ الْعُودَ قُدَّامِي فَأَتْبَعُهُ وَقَدْ أَرَانِي وَلَا يَمْشِي بِيَ الْعُودُ
يا قَومِ أَذني لِبَعضِ الحَيِّ عاشِقَةٌ وَالأُذنُ تَعشَقُ قَبلَ العَينِ أَحيانا قالوا بِمَن لا تَرى تَهذي فَقُلتُ لَهُم الأُذنُ كَالعَينِ تُؤتي القَلبَ ما كانا هَل مِن دَواءٍ لِمَشغُوفٍ بِجارِيَةٍ يَلقَى بِلُقيانِها رَوحًا وَرَيحانا
نَقلُ الجِبالِ الرَواسي عَن مَواضِعِها أَخَفُّ مِن نَقلِ نَفسٍ حينَ تَنصَرِفُ هَمّوا بِهَجري وَكانَت في نُفوسِهِمُ بَقِيَّةٌ مِن هَوىً باقٍ فَما وَقَفوا
نَحنُ في دارِ بَلاءٍ وَأَذى وَشَقاءٍ وَعَناءٍ وَعَنَتْ مَنزِلٌ ما يَثبُتُ المَرءُ بِهِ سالِمًا إِلّا قَليلًا إِن ثَبَتْ
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @Abiat7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @Abiat7 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 10 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بيتٌ بقصِيدَة” (@Abiat7), 18,242 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abiat7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.