Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌴Ahmed Hussein🌴

Channel

🌴Ahmed Hussein🌴

@Ahmed_Hussein_tel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

813subscribers

+94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002331696647
TypeChannel
Username@Ahmed_Hussein_tel
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ahmed_Hussein_tel

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7198137667 August 2026 — 719 subscribers7 August 2026 — 720 subscribers14 August 2026 — 724 subscribers22 August 2026 — 733 subscribers28 August 2026 — 741 subscribers4 September 2026 — 746 subscribers12 September 2026 — 813 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 23:00813+67
4 Sept 2026, 19:37746+5
28 Aug 2026, 23:44741+8
22 Aug 2026, 15:28733+9
14 Aug 2026, 14:13724+4
7 Aug 2026, 18:12720+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:48719first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8661.0%
🔥1913.5%
😁139.22%
👍128.51%
🤣74.96%
🏆21.42%
👏10.709%
🤔10.709%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC112 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

جعفر الصادق رضي الله عنه بين السنة والشيعة🎙 بوت التواصل : @Albgdadybot 💬 #أرشيف_الشيخ_ابوعبدالرحمن_البغدادي #ابوعبدالرحمن_البغدادي #احمد_البغدادي #الشيخ_البغدادي

😁31🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 03:21 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ديك الجن عند الرافضة بوت التواصل: @Albgdadybot 💬 #أرشيف_الشيخ_ابوعبدالرحمن_البغدادي #ابوعبدالرحمن_البغدادي #احمد_البغدادي #الشيخ_البغدادي

👍3

30 Jul 2026, 03:25 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Y6SXvPLrLi8?is=ieLw7N7IdGf3wsfa

6

27 Jul 2026, 23:49 UTC274 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zit13mVideo

معضلة بلانتينجا باعتراف الواقعيين هذي المعضلة غالبية الملاحدة الواقعيين معترفين فيها حتى ديريك بارفيت وإيريك ويلنبرغ وديفيد إينوخ وكما صاغها ويلنبرغ: “إذا كانت العملية التطورية العشوائية مسؤولة عن تطور تفكيرنا الأخلاقي، فلدينا دائمًا مُبطِل لثقتنا بمعتقداتنا الأخلاقية، لأن التطور موجه نحو البقاء الجيني وليس الوصول إلى الحقيقة.” ثم رد عليها واعترف بالنهاية في 2014 وشرحت عنها هنا مع تطويرها بإلزام الإيمان بالله.

9🤣1

26 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC360 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اخوان الذي سيراسلني بالخاص يسألني عن موضوع انا راد عليه بالفديوات وهو لم يتعب حالة ليشاهد المقاطع. ساضطر لحظره مباشرة. الخاص ليس لامور مردود عليها. الوقت ضيق والعمر قصير

15👍1

23 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTC708 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

انتظروا الحلقة الجاية عن زواج الصغيرة. سناخذ بريك من نظرية التطور كم حلقة نعزز فيها سلسلة الردود ودلائل النبوة ثم نعود لاكمالها

🔥1310

23 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC471 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شيروا الفديو بارك الله فيكم ولا تنسون اللايك والكومنت

11

23 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC464 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/GN6M3pBtfYY?is=sHjqAVCF97ZhsAvB

7🏆2🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC411 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترقبوا اليوم فديو عن الوهم العلمي حين يتحول الجهل بالشيء إلى دليل على وجوده!رحلة كاشفة تسبر أسرار الفضيحة المنهجية لـ "الأعضاء الضامرة" والجينات الخردة (Junk DNA). يستعرض النص كيف تهاوت ادعاءات عدم الفائدة أمام الاكتشافات الحديثة—من الزائدة الدودية وعظام حوض الحوت إلى الجينات الكاذبة والفيروسات القهقرية—وكيف يلتف الفكر التطوري على الحقائق عبر مغالطات "الاستدلال الدائري" وإعادة تعريف المصطلحات للهروب من مأزق "الاحتكام

👍54🔥4

22 Jul 2026, 00:37 UTC426 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

لمن اراد هذا الفديو عن الوثائقي الطبي الشهير the human body وتشبيه الجنين بالعلقة في الحلقة الثانية الدقيقة 17:50

5

15 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC447 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Amery_channelVideo

حين يتفلسف الاحمق

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ahmed_Hussein_tel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌴Ahmed Hussein🌴” (@Ahmed_Hussein_tel), 813 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahmed_Hussein_tel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.