Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for د. زيط ميط التنويري (إبراهيم الزيادي)

Channel

د. زيط ميط التنويري (إبراهيم الزيادي)

@zit13m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,580subscribers

+101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882692275
TypeChannel
Username@zit13m
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zit13m

Growth

3,4794,0193,7497 August 2026 — 3,479 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,479 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,486 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,491 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,496 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,507 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,520 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,019 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,017 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,580 subscribers3,5807 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,398–4,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 18:383,580-437
29 Aug 2026, 05:254,017-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:324,019+499
23 Aug 2026, 10:243,520+13
19 Aug 2026, 17:123,507+11
16 Aug 2026, 17:523,496+5
13 Aug 2026, 06:543,491+5
10 Aug 2026, 00:413,486+5
7 Aug 2026, 07:113,481+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:003,479no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:483,479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11749.6%
🔥4519.1%
🤣3213.6%
😁125.08%
🥰125.08%
🌚104.24%
❤‍🔥52.12%
😭31.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC265 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

ليس هناك ملحدون بالخنادق ولا في سكرات الموت

14

2 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC491 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣3😁32🌚1🥰1😭1

2 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC493 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣3😁32🌚1🔥1😭1

2 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC480 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مناظرة قصي والدكتور هيثم طلعت لن تتم وهذه فقط اعذار من قصي ليتهرب قال راح يقتلني هو الواحد صعب يلاقي ملحد رجال؟ كنت بسوي فيديو وقلت ما بضيع وقتي قصي مستواه ضعيف جداً والله.

14🌚1🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC473 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

3😭1

2 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC513 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

احدهم ارسل بالبوت: وذكر ردود الملحد الواقعي جون داناهر والله ياصديقي جون داناهر بالأصل كواقعي غير طبيعي يرد عليكم وهو اول من ذكرت اقتباسه بالفيديو واعترف ان كل الردود على معضلة الوعي EAAN و EDAs متهافتة وانت لو اطلعت على مقاله هنا بتلاقيه ينتقد ديفيد إينوخ على رده الغبي غير المنطقي ويرد على كهاني مقاله عبارة عن اعتراف عليكم مش لكم والملاحدة الي ينشروا عنه حمير لم يفهموا او يقرؤوا ما نشره أصلاً يكفي تأمل بداية الفيدي

6

2 Aug 2026, 00:23 UTC505 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الملاحدة الي يتابعونا اعطيكم فرصة اذكروا لي ملحد واقعي واحد رد على هذه المعضلة؟ هذا البوت ارسل عليه دون معرفة هويتك. @Zitmit13_bot كل الذين تذكرون أساميهم والله احرقكم من ذات كتبهم ومقالاتهم فلم اعرض كثير من الكتب إلى الآن تكاسلاً مني، فقط لأثبت أنكم لا تتجاوزون عناوين كتبهم وتخدرون أنفسكم أنها محلولة، لا نقاش بالعقليات فالعقل مطعون به تذكر.

9

2 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC437 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

للضحك فقط❗️ في نفس ورقة الفيسلوف الواقعي مايكل هيومر A Liberal Realist Answer to Debunking Skepticism: The Empirical Case for Realism حاول هيومر الرد على معضلة موثوقية الوعي التي تهدد الواقعية الأخلاقية تجده يقول ص2 ويعترف: لا يوجد سبب مستقل للاعتقاد في أن ثقافتنا على وجه الخصوص يجب أن تمتلك المعتقدات الأخلاقية الصحيحة. وهذا الطعن كافيٍ للرد على مقدمة ورقته ص1: ادعي ان الليبرالية رؤية اخلاقية موضوعية، البشرية تصبح أك

3🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC349 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وهنا تكمن الأحاااااا❗️ ركز ع الفيديو هذا مقتص من اخر فلاسفة ذكرتهم. بالأمس اطلعت على رد الفيلسوف غاي كهاني Guy Kahane ومايكل هيومر على معضلة التفنيد التطوري EDAs والله لا أكذب بكلمة إذا قلت الى الآن لم اجد أحداً منهم إلا واعترف بشكل كارثي بما يطعن بموثوقية معتقداتنا الأخلاقية كهاني بآخر الورقة يعترف أن الحل عدم تفسير تطور عقولنا عبر نظرية الانتخاب الطبيعي ويقول: إن التفسير بنظرية التطور نفسه طعن بالعقل. أما مايكل

6🔥1🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC334 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

6🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

تراجع❗️ هذا الملحد الديوث مش هو خالد المبصوق

11

1 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC374 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

حدثت عملية انتحارية الملحد فجر نفسه في منشور وهم العلمانية علق بهذا التعليق ثم حذف حسابه وذهب إلى العدم...

8🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zit13m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

عندي فضيحة لملحد من العيار الثقيل وتسريب لرسائل له وهو يطلب من أجانب ان يمارسوا الجنس مع امه انشرها ولا استر يا دولي؟ مع العلم أنه من المدافعين عن وجود أخلاق دون وجود إله واغلب منشوراته فلسفة أخلاق

  1. انشرها ليتربى 😇93%
  2. استر يا دولي 🥺10%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أحمد أبو الفتوح
@Afotouhll · 41,039
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
درع الأمة
@UmahShield · 29,997
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
مُدونتي - مخيمر
@Mudawanti · 38,843
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
رواسخ
@Rawasekh · 31,691
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Internal Medicine | MW
@Medical_Patna · 44,841
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“د. زيط ميط التنويري (إبراهيم الزيادي)” (@zit13m), 3,580 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zit13m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.