Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Гофман

Channel

Александр Гофман

@AlGofman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,246subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394502709
TypeChannel
Username@AlGofman
Created14 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlGofman

Growth

2,2462,2602,2536 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,256 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,252 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,250 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,247 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,246 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,244–2,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 15:532,246-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:432,247-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:182,250-2
22 Aug 2026, 23:522,252+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:042,251-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:492,252-4
12 Aug 2026, 19:032,256-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:002,260no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:522,260first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9853.6%
🔥3720.2%
👍2513.7%
👏94.92%
💔63.28%
😢31.64%
💯21.09%
😁21.09%
🍾10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC532 viewsread 7 August 2026

Мой список кораблей, посвящённый Нолану:

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC441 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cinefiles_txt

Наш финальный раунд по «Одиссее» Забавно, что даже спустя две недели после проката каждый второй отзыв о фильме начинается с перечисления базовых, далёких от кинематографа вещей. Например, что не бывает исторически достоверных экранизаций античных мифов. Или что афроамериканки тоже бывают красивыми. Или что единственный бог, чьи потребности обслуживает сюжет, — это всегда режиссёр; в случае же с таким авторитарным т

10👍10😁2🍾1😢1

27 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC957 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думал, что круче француза из «Зловещих мертвецов» в этом году ещё никто не зажигал, но финальный замес из гонконгской «Живой ярости» – это практически «Зловещие мертвецы» от мира боевика и есть. Причём весь фильм точно также укладывается в формулу «так много, что местами просто не может не быть хорошо»; какой-то год авторов, реанимирующих подуставшие жанры в обход всех уже давно приевшихся деконструктивистских примо

27👍2

25 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC890 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Получился, увы, один из самых невнятных фильмов у дедушки:

💯1

25 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC859 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cinefiles_txt

Мы посмотрели «День разоблачения» – аттракцион старой формации, разоблачающий разве что консервативный авторский метод Само собой, Стивен Спилберг, человек-глыба, великий гуру, собственноручно написавший большинство тех негласных канонов, из которых состоят современные летние блокбастеры, просто физически не может сделать совсем уж плохо. Здесь есть классная Эмили Блант, воодушевлённо шпарящая на языке Пушкина, ест

👍7💔3👏2

17 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,350 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​В «Обсессии» есть одна запоминающаяся сцена с автомобилем, которая способна пробудить пульс даже у покойника; так вот новые «Зловещие мертвецы» – примерно наполовину как та сцена с автомобилем (и тут есть своя запоминающаяся сцена с автомобилем!), а это, по-моему, уже несколько компенсирует тот факт, что на вторую свою половину кино довольно в лоб проговаривает самые базовые вещи про родовые травмы и природу внутрис

8👍5🔥3

2 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ну и да, про ещё один хороший фильм с Самарой я просто не могу здесь не рассказать:

2 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈1,370 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cinefiles_txt

Мы посмотрели «Опасные отношения» – ещё один задорный трэш с Самарой Уивинг Разница в том, что эта его разновидность отличается гораздо более уплотнённой динамикой и нарезкой сразу нескольких вербальных и пластических панчлайнов; т. е. когда у фильма, казалось бы, вот-вот иссякнут запасы остроумия, он просто добавляет ещё одного нового персонажа или идёт на радикальную смену сюжетных и жанровых регистров. Сначала э

👏7

1 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈4,730 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Каролина Кэролайн» неожиданно сложилась в вымоченную в тёплых мелодраматических катри-тонах реплику «Пустошей» – совпадающую с маликовским шедевром вплоть до медленного фаталистского танца и позаимствованной у Мартина Шина джинсовки. И если вспомнить, что создатели настаивают на том, что дорога жизни так или иначе складывается для всех нас в плоский круг, получается не лишённая некоторого намёка на смысл поездка.

9💔3

29 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,430 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Когда всего лишь включил трейлер, а кажется, что посмотрел фильм года.

🔥344💯1

10 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,920 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Грегг Араки вновь демонстрирует, что главное, по-видимому, сердцем не стареть, или если бы словосочетание «чистый секс» было бы трейлером.

5😢2

26 May 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026

К некоторым провокациям Ларса, как выяснилось, даже сейчас очень приятно возвращаться:

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @AlGofman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ШишКИНО
@shishkino · 42,395
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Кроненберг нефильтрованный
@Cronenberg1664 · 41,022
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Гофман” (@AlGofman), 2,246 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlGofman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.