Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cinemagraphie

Channel

Cinemagraphie

@cinemagraphie

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,444subscribers

-155 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140055702
TypeChannel
Username@cinemagraphie
Created23 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cinemagraphie

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,44421,59921,521.56 August 2026 — 21,599 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,599 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,598 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,588 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,585 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,586 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,575 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,574 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,568 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,573 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,569 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,559 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,547 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,545 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,543 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,536 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,537 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,531 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,522 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,523 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,525 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,519 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,511 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,503 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,498 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,489 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,482 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,471 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,465 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,446 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,444 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,421–21,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:1521,444-2
16 Sept 2026, 01:5721,446-19
12 Sept 2026, 20:4021,465-6
10 Sept 2026, 23:3621,471-11
8 Sept 2026, 00:1921,482-7
4 Sept 2026, 21:3521,489-9
3 Sept 2026, 08:3821,498-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:2621,503-8
31 Aug 2026, 22:0421,511-8
31 Aug 2026, 00:2421,519-6
30 Aug 2026, 02:5821,525+2
29 Aug 2026, 01:4621,523+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:5821,522-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:2321,531-6
25 Aug 2026, 17:5721,537+1
24 Aug 2026, 15:4821,536-7
22 Aug 2026, 22:1821,543-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:0221,545-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:1621,547-12
19 Aug 2026, 11:5421,559first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.76%
avg views ÷ 21,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total16,749
Reactions total373
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

892 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
57364.2%
❤‍🔥12313.8%
🔥9811.0%
👍242.69%
💔192.13%
🤡171.91%
🥰171.91%
😁151.68%
🤩40.448%
👎10.112%
🤔10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 892 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cinemagraphie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC899 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Грязь, спорт и секс – базовые интересы среднестатистического человека по версии жёлтой прессы. Фильм «Чернила» Дэнни Бойла, открывший вчера Венецианский кинофестиваль, рассказывает о том, как два человека разрушают стандарты британской журналистики и создают сегодняшний движимый сенсациями мир. По сюжету, в 1969-м году восходящий медиамагнат Руперт Мёрдок и редактор Ларри Лэмб решают превратить захудалую газетёнку «

9🔥3

2 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,510 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Осень начинается с Венецианского кинофестиваля – сегодня смотр стартует в 83-й раз. Как обычно, берём на себя мониторинг западной прессы, чтобы держать вас в курсе главных открытий и провалов. Как примут новые фильмы Ли Чхан-дона, Вернера Херцога, Мартина Макдоны и других, узнаем в ближайшие дни. Особенно интересны реакции на «материнский» фильм «Дау» Ильи Хржановского*, представленный в основном конкурсе. Включай

29👍3🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,580 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С Днём знаний! 🎬 «Эмоции», реж. Нобухико Обаяси, 1966

41💔4🔥4

31 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈1,720 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @andreytarkovskyPhoto

Вот и лето прошло, Словно и не бывало. На пригреве тепло. Только этого мало. Всё, что сбыться могло, Мне, как лист пятипалый, Прямо в руки легло. Только этого мало. Понапрасну ни зло, Ни добро не пропало, Всё горело светло. Только этого мало. Жизнь брала под крыло, Берегла и спасала. Мне и вправду везло. Только этого мало. Листьев не обожгло, Веток не обломало… День промыт, как стекло. Только этого мало. (с) Арс

❤‍🔥5525👍4

30 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,010 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Ясно, что тенденция верить в то, что мы это мы, есть у нас всех. Но присмотритесь-ка получше – разве так уж прочно мы в этом уверены?» – «Я» в теории Фрейда и в технике психоанализа», Жак Лакан. 🎬 «Главное – любить», реж. Анджей Жулавский, 1975/«Граница. Таёжный роман», реж. Александр Митта, 2000

23🔥5❤‍🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,500 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Всё о моей матери», реж. Педро Альмодовар, 1999/«Одинокий мужчина», реж. Том Форд, 2009 О методах режиссёра-эстета, пришедшего в кино из мира высокой моды, читаем здесь.

45👍6❤‍🔥3🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈3,320 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Портрет Нарцисса: единственный в своём роде человек, всемогущий как телом, так и духом, воплощенным в его речи, независимый и самостоятельный всякий раз, когда ему этого хочется, но другие зависят от него, хотя он не чувствует никаких желаний по отношению к ним. ...Есть ли кто-нибудь, кто не узнаёт эту фигуру из тайных глубин своих фантазий, независимо от того, служит ли он ей или поддерживает безумный план воплоти

31💔4🔥3

21 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈3,210 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Наверное, есть много такого, что горячая ванна не в силах исправить, но я об этом почти ничего не знаю. Когда мне грустно и кажется, что я вот-вот умру, или когда я так нервничаю, что не могу заснуть, или влюблена в кого-то, с кем не увижусь целую неделю, я сникаю, а потом говорю себе: «Пойду-ка я приму горячую ванну», – «Под стеклянным колпаком», Сильвия Плат. 🎬 Кирстен Данст в «Марии-Антуанетте» Софии Копполы и

🔥42❤‍🔥1513👍1

20 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC≈2,730 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Андалузский пёс», реж. Луис Бунюэль, 1929/«Гадкая сестра», реж. Эмили Блихфельдт, 2025

30🤡5🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,330 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Фильмы Андрея Звягинцева в международных постерах: 1. «Возвращение», 2003 2. «Изгнание», 2007 3. «Елена», 2011 4. «Левиафан», 2014 5. «Нелюбовь», 2017 6. «Минотавр», 2026

❤‍🔥4020🔥7👍6🤡6🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈3,940 views45 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
File

«То, как она прикуривает сигарету, – лучший аргумент в пользу курения», – Вайнона Райдер о магии Джины Роулендс. Об одном из главных перфомансах музы Кассаветиса, где бурбон и сигареты играют не последнюю роль, – в тексте для b17. 🎬 «Ночь на Земле», реж. Джим Джармуш, 1991

31🥰8👍4😁2

10 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈8,540 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Катрин Денёв в «Отвращении» Романа Полански и «Дневной красавице» Луиса Бунюэля 👁

38🔥5❤‍🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cinemagraphie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

f/64
@sixtyfourmag · 71,709
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Искусство кино
@kinoartru · 23,887
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,265
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Cinemaholics
@cinemaholicsofficial · 30,967
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
СЕАНС
@seance_light · 24,078
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Кроненберг нефильтрованный
@Cronenberg1664 · 41,358
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Общим планом
@obschimplanom · 23,047
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
История одной картины
@pic_history · 50,003
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Кинокостюм для чайников
@kinocostume · 39,210
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Евгений Жаринов - Лекции и анонсы
@Evgeny_Zharinov · 29,682
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
КИНО CLUB
@filmoclub · 22,744
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Это всего лишь A-ONE
@aonefilms · 49,876
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
N С К У С С Т В О
@NCKYCCTBO · 31,554
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
ШишКИНО
@shishkino · 42,278
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Макс и сериалы
@MaxAndSe · 22,895
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Антон Долин
@anton_dolin · 51,692
Telegram ranks this channel #99 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cinemagraphie” (@cinemagraphie), 21,444 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinemagraphie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.