Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,315–9,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:01
9,328
-8
8 Sept 2026, 01:37
9,336
-7
2 Sept 2026, 13:27
9,343
-11
30 Aug 2026, 08:13
9,354
-3
27 Aug 2026, 03:53
9,357
+5
24 Aug 2026, 06:43
9,352
-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:34
9,354
-10
17 Aug 2026, 16:58
9,364
-9
14 Aug 2026, 22:18
9,373
-13
11 Aug 2026, 23:52
9,386
-5
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
9,391
-17
6 Aug 2026, 15:02
9,408
-6
6 Aug 2026, 06:02
9,414
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.78%
avg views ÷ 9,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
726
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
24 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
3,630
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
874 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
580
66.4%
🔥
140
16.0%
❤🔥
55
6.29%
💘
41
4.69%
🥰
25
2.86%
⚡
18
2.06%
🍓
8
0.915%
custom 5388866436607259959
7
0.801%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katya_telegina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну и если уж зашла речь про «Эмму.», то пусть и будет немного кадров про цвета и декор, цвета и принты. Хотя этого внутри фильма много больше.
Если, например, вам нравится розово-желтая часть «Марии-Антуанетты» Копполы по цвету, то тут этого в избытке — это одни из главных цветов палитры.
Интересно, что сама палитра сложная, нельзя четко выделить только 3 или 4 цвета. И костюмы и интерьеры меняются вслед за настрое…
Пересматриваю «Эмму.», 2020, к киноклубу потому что это самая нарядная и ироничная экранизация Джейн Остин. И я не могу сдержаться и написать про кастинг.
КАК же сильные второстепенные персонажи воруют экран у Ани Тейлор-Джой. Миа Гот и Джош О’Коннор в максимально гротесково-условной комедийной манере существования, а следом и другие актеры. Если вы не любите утрированную комедию, то вам не понравится, но кто любит …
Производство «Ста лет одиночества» было самым масштабным для Колумбии. Съемки проходили в 22 муниципалитетах Колумбии.
97% актерского состава — колумбийцы, при этом было рассмотрено более 10 000 кандидатур.
В производстве участвовало более 850 местных поставщиков.
97% тканей, использованных для создания костюмов, были колумбийского происхождения. Было создано около 40 000 предметов костюма.
Главная декорация расп…
В это воскресение выходит заключительный эпизод сериала «Сто лет одиночества»
Я еще не добаралась до 2 сезона, ждала финал. Но 1 сезон был невероятно красив, с эффекктым кастингом, крутыми декорациями.
Возможно, я мало читаю каналов, а может мне не кажется, и мало кто отмечал этот проект. А он заслуживает внимания много больше разных распиаренных сериалов.
Про производство декораций было сложно найти информацию, чт…
Так как через несколько дней начнётся киноклуб «Разум, чувства и визуальные решения в романтических экранизациях», хотела пару слов написать, зачем он мне.
Я многому научилась через мини исследования: чем этот кадр отличается от того, а тот ролик от этого, а почему именно этот фильм на меня работает таким образом? С каждой лекцией или курсом я продолжаю охватывать какие-то уголки и секретики. Теперь настал черед ром…
Есть фильмы с отличной фактурой для разбора интерьеров или палитры и «Приглашение» Оливии Уайлд щедро на эти элементы, но в плане понимания работы с визуалом — этот фильм куда более особенная история.
Любой сценарий можно снять множеством способов. И благодаря тому, что это уже седьмая версия пьесы, можно сравнить разные подходы.
Как задачу с интерьером «обычной творческой семьи» решали в испанском, немецком, корей…
Спасибо всем, кто написал, буду искать, чем радовать себя и вас.
Из хороших новостей:
Сделала очередную редакцию небольшой книги, над которой работаем с одним человеком уже очень давно. Наконец-то отчетливо почувствовала, что книга точно будет. Это дает уверенности и сил, что пора садится за свою, которую много месяцев откладывала.
Хоть медленно, но регулярно, собираю материал на видео выпуск (эссе? - пока не поня…
Слышу, получаю сообщения, читаю в инстаграм, какой тяжелый период сейчас у многих. И у меня тоже. Давно такого не было.
Если в трудный 2022 год писать сюда было спасением, некоторой формой эскапизма, и я писала вхалеб, то сейчас так совершенно не выходит — удаляю написаные тексты и посты. Потому что не вижу смысла их постить.
Очень хотелось бы не просто писать о красотах и цветах, а как-то транслировать поддержку. …
30 августа - 30 сентября
Киноклуб Сентиментальный сентябрь
Смотрим фильмы по Джейн Остин и не только, обсуждаем художественные решения.
И делаем творческое задание — одни составляют свой концепт фильма, другие, по желанию, могут вышивать или даже писать стихи.
Фильмы основной программы интересно разбирать через режиссерскую перспективу: Джейн Кэпмион, Джо Райт, Андреа Арнольд, Селин Сиама и Отем де Уальд (снимала …
Второй раз в жизни лицезрела Млечный Путь. Реальный гигантский Млечный Путь.
Непередаваемые ощущения.
Это фото с моего телефона не передает примерно ничего, лишь намек и фрагмент, от того, что обозревали глаза на самом деле. И по всему этому метеоры, то тут, то там.
Две самые яркие точки - Лира и Альтаир ✨
Как человек, который когда-то постоянно смотрел «Билли Эллиота», и который любит коллекционировтаь примеры, когда создатели кино вдохновлялись именно фотографиями — прибываю в восторге от ЭТОГО поста (как хорошо, что редкие каналы, что я читаю, делятся особенными находками среди небольших каналов). Цитирую кусочек поста:
Сценарист “Билли Эллиота” Ли Холл вручил книгу команде художников-постановщиков (каждому по экз…
Ксати прямо сейчас в повторном прокате идет «Грозовой перевал» Андреи Арнольд 2011 года
Живая камера, которую словно продувает ветром (и нас вместе с ней) и эмоционально-поэтический сторителл.
Не зависимо от того, как вы относитесь к роману, и отнесетесь к повествованию фильма, это очень красиво. Старый трейлер.
Фильм прокатывает Киномания. Я правда чуть поздно написала, и сеансов уже немного, поэтому если вас инт…
🔥16❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @katya_telegina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@katya_telegina edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кинокостюм для чайников @kinocostume · 39,210 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Cinemaholics @cinemaholicsofficial · 30,967 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
ШишКИНО @shishkino · 42,278 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Общим планом @obschimplanom · 23,047 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Ремизорро @remizorro · 30,014 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
Рты Ванессы Паради @cine_fan · 21,988 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Искусство кино @kinoartru · 23,887 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Фёдор, Бонд и Чук @FBChu · 44,983 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Кинопоиск | Индустрия @kinopoisk_Industry · 28,537 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
СЕАНС @seance_light · 24,078 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Это всего лишь A-ONE @aonefilms · 49,876 Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Теледжина” (@katya_telegina), 9,328 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katya_telegina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.