Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Director's Card

Channel

Director's Card

@thedirectorscut

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,044subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001462040119
TypeChannel
Username@thedirectorscut
Created7 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thedirectorscut

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0403,0693,054.56 August 2026 — 3,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,042 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,047 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,046 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,058 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,066 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,069 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,068 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,061 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,058 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,051 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,045 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,044 subscribers3,0446 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,036–3,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:153,044-1
7 Sept 2026, 15:403,045-6
2 Sept 2026, 07:393,051-7
30 Aug 2026, 14:573,058-3
27 Aug 2026, 23:433,061-7
24 Aug 2026, 16:053,068-1
21 Aug 2026, 02:343,069+3
17 Aug 2026, 19:163,066+8
15 Aug 2026, 00:433,058+12
12 Aug 2026, 00:423,046-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:023,047+5
6 Aug 2026, 11:203,042+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:013,040no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:373,040first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15544.2%
🔥6819.4%
🥰3710.5%
❤‍🔥359.97%
😁329.12%
💯102.85%
💘51.42%
👍41.14%
😎20.57%
🤩20.57%
😢10.285%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thedirectorscut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC290 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моё лицо, когда текст в 2026 году естественным образом напрашивается на формулировку типа «*Нечто* — это не просто X, это Y» 🫥 Director's Card | #Мем

😁144💯3😢1

6 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTCviews —

Director's Card pinned «Любая достаточно развитая технология неотличима от магии. Особенно это касается магии кино. С сегодняшнего дня на КИНОТВ начинает выходить мой цикл статей об истории плёнки 🍿 — огромный по объёму материал, приуроченный к очередному буму популярности аналогового…»

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC407 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У Яси Фроловой и Лёши Филиппова из Покебола с предсказанием стартовал новый подкаст об анимации на КИНОТВ — с дебютом на тему испанских мультипликаторов (в том числе о перевернувшем индустрию Альберто Мьельго) Легенд жанра мы слушаем здесь: 🔘Telegram 🔘Яндекс.Музыка 🔘ВК 🔘Apple Podcasts

10🥰4🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC390 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alpinaruPhoto

🪩🪩🪩🪩🪩🪩🪩 «Отец» на большом экране и разговор о жизни Энтони Хопкинса 8 августа приглашаем в Центр «Зотов» на специальный показ фильма «Отец», пронзительной драмы с Энтони Хопкинсом, главная роль в которой принесла актёру второй «Оскар». После показа состоится обсуждение фильма и презентация автобиографии актёра «Мы справились, парень». В обсуждении примут участие: ▪️Екатерина Манойло — писательница, автор бестселл

6🔥3❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC398 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скриншотики скриншотиками, но давайте не забывать и о методе исследования персонажей через мемы Кидайте в комменты кадры из своих любимых фильмов, подходящие под шаблон 🫥 Director's Card | #Мем

😁18🔥65

5 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC400 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Днём в его глазах отражалось небо А ночью — звёзды, которых он хотел достичь Lawrence of Arabia / Лоуренс Аравийский (1962) режиссёр: Дэвид Лин 🫥 Director's Card | #Кадры

23🔥8🥰3

4 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈5,830 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Любая достаточно развитая технология неотличима от магии. Особенно это касается магии кино. С сегодняшнего дня на КИНОТВ начинает выходить мой цикл статей об истории плёнки 🍿 — огромный по объёму материал, приуроченный к очередному буму популярности аналогового кинопроизводства. За бум этот можно было поблагодарить Нолана с его «Одиссеей» и одержимостью форматом IMAX. Но правда в том, что корни человеческой привяза

❤‍🔥34🔥17🥰162🤩2

3 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC491 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ershovfilmPhoto

Дебютный постер фильма Нельсона Йео «Дом на Луне» (The House on the Moon). По жанру это будет уся. Когда великий лучник Хоу И пропадает без вести, отправившись на поиски умирающего солнца, сказочная дева Чан Эр вместе с космонавтом с Земли вынуждена уйти на темную сторону Луны, чтобы найти своего возлюбленного. Премьера фильма пройдет в конкурсе фестиваля в Локарно 14 августа.

10💘5🔥4

3 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC547 views88 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Хочу сказать спасибо каждому, кто остаётся на этом канале и читает весь здешний контент — вопреки тоннам инфошума, обилию достойных альтернатив и возможному несогласию с отдельными мыслями Я пытаюсь рассказывать о близких себе вещах так, как о них не расскажет никто другой. Стараюсь делать это языком, который не канючит о внимании и не просит Задуматься о высоком — а захватывает и отправляет в путешествие по тропам,

54🔥18🥰14😎2

3 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC550 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когда я беру ручку, последнее, чего я от неё жду — это указаний о том, как нужно писать https://daily.afisha.ru/cinema/33502-vse-tochki-nad-ii-kak-kinokritiki-i-kinozhurnalisty-ispolzuyut-v-svoey-rabote-neyroseti/

13👍4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @thedirectorscut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cinemagraphie
@cinemagraphie · 21,444
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Искусство кино
@kinoartru · 23,887
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
надо глянуть.
@need2watch · 23,556
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Cinemaholics
@cinemaholicsofficial · 30,967
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Это всего лишь A-ONE
@aonefilms · 49,876
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Общим планом
@obschimplanom · 23,047
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Антон Долин
@anton_dolin · 51,692
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Director's Card” (@thedirectorscut), 3,044 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedirectorscut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.