Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IT FOLLOWS // Однажды в кино

Channel

IT FOLLOWS // Однажды в кино

@itfollowspub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,411subscribers

+373 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187504833
TypeChannel
Username@itfollowspub
Created14 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/itfollowspub

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,03819,54419,2916 August 2026 — 19,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,056 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,071 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,059 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,067 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,082 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,355 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,345 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,353 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,412 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,544 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,430 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,449 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,414 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,408 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,399 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,410 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,416 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,409 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,405 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,399 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,403 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,412 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,378 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,345 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,394 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,389 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,358 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,350 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,310 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,293 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,411 subscribers19,4116 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +373. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,962–19,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:3719,411+118
16 Sept 2026, 06:5819,293-17
14 Sept 2026, 16:1919,310-40
13 Sept 2026, 03:1719,350-8
11 Sept 2026, 06:2019,358-31
8 Sept 2026, 08:3619,389-5
5 Sept 2026, 04:5619,394+49
3 Sept 2026, 09:5619,345-33
2 Sept 2026, 05:3419,378-34
1 Sept 2026, 03:4319,412+9
31 Aug 2026, 02:2419,403+4
30 Aug 2026, 05:2519,399-6
29 Aug 2026, 07:2319,405-7
28 Aug 2026, 05:4419,412+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:4419,409-7
26 Aug 2026, 05:1719,416+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:0419,410+11
23 Aug 2026, 21:2619,399-9
22 Aug 2026, 05:5419,408-6
20 Aug 2026, 23:3519,414first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 19,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held56 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total30,777
Reactions total769
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 06s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,951 reactions across 55 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,32133.4%
👍61115.5%
🔥52113.2%
🤣3468.76%
😎1523.85%
😱1253.16%
💔1012.56%
👏862.18%
🤪802.02%
🏆691.75%
681.72%
🤝571.44%
🤔531.34%
🗿501.27%
💯491.24%
🥰491.24%
🕊461.16%
🌭280.709%
💋170.43%
🤗150.38%
13 further kinds1072.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,960 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 56 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itfollowspub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.79%
1 of 56 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,380
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,710
over 55 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vfnxw4AqMd114 August 202614 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC997 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Восемнадцать лет назад комедия «Солдаты неудачи» подарила нам лучший фильм внутри фильма, которого никогда не существовало. «Переулок Сатаны» — культовая классика, которая показана лишь в формате короткого тизера. Кирк Лазарус и Тоби Магуайр исполнили роли двух монахов, отправившихся в запретное, абсурдное и совершенно безумное приключение. Так родился Satan’s Alley — вымышленная классика. Спустя 18 лет зрители вс

🤣25🙏1110🗿1🤪1

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,150 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤩 Отечественный кинобомонд собрался в одной драматической истории: состоялась премьера сериала «Большая фарма» Светлана Ходченкова, Сергей Горошко, Ольга Лерман и Наталья Бардо сыграли в интригующей драме о том, что произойдет, если лекарство от всех болезней действительно изобретут. Двое ученых создают революционный препарат, способный победить даже рак. Но открытие, которое может спасти миллионы, оказывается слиш

👍364🙉4👌1🤣1

1 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,780 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Раскадровки к фильму «СЕМЬ» отражают видение Дэвида Финчера, превратившего экранный город в гниющий, клаустрофобный неонуарный организм. Ракурсы, расположение мебели и удушающая теснота комнат были просчитаны еще на бумаге, чтобы само пространство психологически давило на зрителя. Наброски фотолаборатории и мрачные эскизы комнат из 7 грехов были перенесены один в один и задали вектор для оператора Дариуса Хонджи, к

👍23🔥157🏆5😱3

1 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,360 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

⏳Спецэффекты, опередившие время: в фильме «Человек-паук 3» Сэма Рэйми графика Песочного человека стала прорывом. Чтобы детально оживить Песочного Человека студия потратила 3 года только на разработку уникального софта. Аниматоры детально изучали физику песчинок: бросали настоящий песок в каскадеров, фиксировали его движение на ветру и при ударах. В итоге для финальной битвы компьютерам пришлось обрабатывать миллиар

👍3718🔥11🗿3

31 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,080 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Драйву» — 15 лет! Отличный повод вновь увидеть его на большом экране. С 10 сентября АРТПОКАЗ выпускает в ограниченный юбилейный прокат культовый фильм Николаса Виндинга Рефна с Райаном Гослингом в главной роли. Главный герой — немногословный водитель, который днём работает автомехаником и каскадёром, а по ночам помогает преступникам скрываться с мест ограблений. Знакомство с соседкой Айрин нарушает привычный ход е

27🔥11🏆6🕊2🗿2

30 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,360 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🕷️Как получилось, что у Sony есть права только на Человека-паука, а почти все остальные герои принадлежат Disney? Сейчас сложно поверить, но в 1996 году Marvel объявила о тотальном банкротстве. Кошельки компании опустели, а индустрия комиксов переживала жуткий кризис. Чтобы выжить, боссы Marvel начали распродавать права на своих персонажей. В 1998 году они пришли к Sony Pictures с королевским предложением: забрать

🤣38197😱6🔥2🤪2

28 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,810 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Кристофер Нолан — один из немногих ныне живущих режиссёров, кто почти не пользуется CGI и маниакально снимает исключительно на натуре, из-за этого его фильмы обретают поразительную осязаемость, глубину и ту редкую кинематографичную "жизнь", которую невозможно сымитировать на зеленом экране. Такую прерогативу могут позволить себе исключительно мастера высшего эшелона, среди которых этот гений режиссуры, умело совмеща

41🔥20👍10🤣8🏆3🤪2

27 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,030 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ридли Скотт отреагировал на недавние слова Тарантино в своем фирменном ироничном стиле, признавшись, что сам никогда бы не назвал свой фильм «Падение Черного ястреба» лучшей картиной XXI века: « — Интересно, что Квентин употреблял. Что бы это ни было, я тоже хочу попробовать. Я бы ни в коем случае не поставил его на первое место »

🤣54🕊5💯3🗿3😇2😎21

25 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈3,240 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎥 Зеркальный трюк Нолана: как вернуть эмоции в кадр На съемках «Одиссеи» Кристофер Нолан использовал хитрую систему зеркал на камерах, чтобы актеры могли сохранять естественный зрительный контакт и эмоциональную связь во время крупных планов. Камеры IMAX невероятно шумные. Чтобы записать чистый звук диалогов на площадке без последующего дубляжа, Нолан и инженеры IMAX поместили камеру в звуконепроницаемый бокс. Из-з

😱3315👍4😨2

25 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈2,600 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🐺Портал к Дракуле и Франкенштейну: для многих первое знакомство с культовыми персонажами началось именно с фильма «Ван Хельсинг» — шикарное тёмное фэнтези с Хью Джекманом, которое держит планку качества даже спустя более двадцать лет Трансформация оборотней здесь признана одной из самых реалистичных в кино. Вместо привычного роста шерсти на коже, монстры буквально «разрывали» свою человеческую плоть изнутри. Декора

40🏆11🔥94👏3🤪3🎉2

25 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,490 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎬 Что делает наше кино «нашим»? Ко Дню российского кино Дзен при поддержке Министерства культуры Российской Федерации и портала ""Культура.РФ"" запустил масштабный спецпроект «Старые фильмы о главном», посвященный картинам, сформировавшим наш культурный код. Внутри собрано все, что нужно киноману: • Док-сериал: топовые критики и историки кино (Егор Москвитин, Иван Кудрявцев, Борис Машковцев) препарируют культовые

🗿85👍3

25 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,590 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🩺Мэттью МакКонахи сбросил почти 23 кг, чтобы сыграть техасского электрика Рона Вудруфа, больного СПИДом в драме «Далласский клуб покупателей», за что удостоился статуэтки и вошёл в историю кино! Актёр похудел до 61 кг. Его рацион был жёстко ограничен. Два яичных белка на завтрак, кусок курицы и диетическая кола. Он терял по три килограмма в неделю и довёл себя до полного истощения. Сам МакКонахи признался, что его

40👍15😱11🔥5🗿3

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @itfollowspub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@itfollowspub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Камера, Мотор!
@kammotor · 24,422
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
надо глянуть.
@need2watch · 23,556
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
МУВИС | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinofilmy_seriali · 109,420
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026
КИНОМИКС | Сериалы
@kinoremix · 154,297
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
Киноманы 🍿| Обсессия Твое сердце будет разбито
@film_smotret_onlain_2026 · 193,305
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,265
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Argentum
@fotoartset · 49,501
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Музыкальное чтиво
@muzika_chtivo · 53,111
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IT FOLLOWS // Однажды в кино” (@itfollowspub), 19,411 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itfollowspub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.