Channel
@cinemarticle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,137subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001074691422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cinemarticle |
| Created | 3 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cinemarticle |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 12,137 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:25 | 12,139 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 12,143 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 12,145 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 12,152 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 12,151 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:50 | 12,155 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 12,164 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 12,171 | -2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 12,173 | -10 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 12,183 | -10 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 12,193 | -25 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 12,218 | -16 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 12,234 | -27 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 12,261 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 12,263 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 12,267 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 12,273 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 12,274 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 12,283 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
319 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 46.4% | |
| custom 5294293417117889863 | 57 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 14.1% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 12.2% | |
| 💅 | 7 | 2.19% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.88% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.57% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.313% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сколько бы мы не бухтели, конечно, все равно очень ждём сериал по вселенной Гарри Поттера. Поэтому смотрим новый трейлер, который выглядит довольно впечатляюще. Ну, а премьеру ждём в декабре.
❤21💯6💔5👏1💅1
На русском языке вышли автобиографические мемуары великого актера театра и кино Энтони Хопкинса «Мы справились, парень». Весь август я читаю эту книгу, возвращаясь к ней снова и снова: перечитываю любимые фрагменты, пересматриваю фильмы с актером и по-новому смотрю на его впечатления от съемок. А еще — на его постоянную борьбу с собой и собственной натурой. Оторваться от книги невозможно, и, думаю, это далеко не пос…
❤29🔥9👍4😘1
Режиссер клипов M.I.A. и Kanye West Ромен Гаврас снял «Жертву обстоятельств» с Аней Тейлор-Джой и Крисом Эвансом — и у нас, кажется, появился «Треугольник печали» 2026 года. Почему новая сатира Гавраса так цепляет, как природный минимализм засасывает нас в историю и зачем режиссер сталкивает лбами богатых, фанатиков и саму природу — читайте выше. 👤 Подписаться на Cinemarticle
❤19👍7🔥4👏1💅1
Как один из лучших сериалов года — «Бухта вдов» — вдохновлялся вселенной Стивена Кинга 1. Фирменная атмосфера Кинга С первых минут «Бухта вдов» вызывает ощущение, будто перед нами очередная экранизация Стивена Кинга. Небольшой городок Новой Англии, жители, десятилетиями живущие бок о бок с необъяснимым злом, и тайна, которую предпочитают не обсуждать, — все это напоминает не только «Оно», но и «Жребий», «Касл-Рок» …
❤36🔥15👍6👀4💅2😁2
Что объединяет российский «Холод» и американский сериал «Яростная»? Сравниваем, как два проекта из разных стран говорят о травме, мести и цене, которую приходится платить за пережитое насилие. 👤 Подписаться на Cinemarticle
❤15custom 52942934171178898637👍6🔥3😁1
Posted without readable text
custom 529429341711788986323👍11🔥6❤4
Posted without readable text
❤16custom 529429341711788986311🔥8💅3
В эти выходные завершился San Diego Comic-Con 2026 — главное событие года для поклонников кино, сериалов, комиксов и поп-культуры. Собрала самые интересные анонсы и проекты, которые теперь ждем больше всего. Cinemarticle
custom 529429341711788986316❤8👍5😭2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @cinemarticle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cinemarticle” (@cinemarticle), 12,137 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinemarticle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.