История названия — The Avalanches В 1994 году будущие участники группы играли в Мельбурне в панк-группе Alarm 115. После её распада они экспериментировали с хип-хопом и семплами, постоянно меняя название проекта. В итоге остановились на The Avalanches — имени, найденном на старой пластинке Ski Surfin' with the Avalanches американской серф-роковой группы, выпущенной в 1963 году. Никакой продуманной концепции в назв…

Channel
Музыкальное чтиво
@muzika_chtivo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,111subscribers
-630 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001736131880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muzika_chtivo |
| Description | Рассказываю о музыкальной культуре Соц сети: https://taplink.cc/music_chtivo РКН https://clck.ru/3MmT8m Владелец: @jamesbrownmsc Купить рекламу на бирже: https://telega.in/c/muzika_chtivo Менеджеры: @quoorh, @Spiral_Miya, @nasmoscow @davidtg_official |
| Created | 25 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muzika_chtivo |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 53,111 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 53,109 | -39 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 53,148 | -25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 53,173 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 53,182 | -60 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 53,242 | -23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 53,265 | -28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 53,293 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:08 | 53,317 | -29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 53,346 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 53,367 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 53,381 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 53,387 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 53,408 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 53,432 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 53,440 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 53,458 | -32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 53,490 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 53,504 | -32 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 53,536 | first reading |
Engagement
236 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.53%
- avg views ÷ 53,111 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,470
- 129 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.98%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 129
- of 236 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 236 (4 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 447,729 |
| Reactions total | 13,331 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,740
- Videos
- ≈1,300
- Links
- ≈4,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9h 38m
- Average length
- 8m 46s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,686 reactions across 235 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,055 | 36.7% | |
| 👍 | 6,354 | 25.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3,944 | 16.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1,402 | 5.68% | |
| 😁 | 508 | 2.06% | |
| 👏 | 501 | 2.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 362 | 1.47% | |
| 🤔 | 332 | 1.34% | |
| 💩 | 234 | 0.948% | |
| 💔 | 227 | 0.92% | |
| 🗿 | 173 | 0.701% | |
| 👻 | 155 | 0.628% | |
| 💘 | 149 | 0.604% | |
| 🍾 | 142 | 0.575% | |
| ⚡ | 136 | 0.551% | |
| 🤣 | 123 | 0.498% | |
| 👎 | 99 | 0.401% | |
| 🤮 | 93 | 0.377% | |
| 🤷♂ | 53 | 0.215% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 0.207% | |
| 34 further kinds | 593 | 2.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 236 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 12
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 236 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muzika_chtivo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 236 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.424%
- 1 of 236 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,420
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,530
- over 235 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGgAUqX | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
VIBE Unkle feat. Thom Yorke - Rabbit In Your Headlights 1998 Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤34🔥20❤🔥4👏2🍓1👻1💘1🤔1
Ваш трек пятницы ? Жду вас в комментариях 🖤 Мой: Nookie - Give a Little Love (94 Lick) Слушать YouTube / Яндекс музыка / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤15🏆5🔥5🤔3🙏1
25 сентября 1968 года родился американский актёр, режиссёр и хип-хоп исполнитель Уилл Смит (Will Smith) Лауреат премий «Оскар», BAFTA и «Золотой глобус» в категории «Лучший актёр» за роль Ричарда Уильямса в фильме «Король Ричард», а также двух премий «Грэмми». Слушать YouTube / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤66👍35🎉19🍾7💩4🏆1👏1👻1
Культ Gracious! — «This Is... Gracious!!» 1971 В начале 1970-х британский прогрессивный рок только формировал собственный язык. Одной из малоизвестных групп этой сцены были Gracious!, выпустившие всего два альбома. Второй — «This Is... Gracious!!» — записали в 1971 году, но издали лишь в 1972-м, уже после распада группы. Отсутствие полноценной промокампании оставило пластинку в тени более известных прог-рокеров. …
❤29👏11👍5
Через 14 дней Честера не стало 💔 Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
💔131🙏18👍3🕊2❤1😭1
24 сентября 1923 родился американский джазмен-трубач Теодор "Фэтс" Наварро (Theodore "Fats" Navarro) Является пионером стиля бибоп в джазовой импровизации в 1940-х. Оказал сильное стилистическое влияние на многих музыкантов, наиболее известным из которых является Клиффорд Браун. Слушать YouTube / Яндекс музыка / Apple Music Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
👍48❤20💘2🔥2❤🔥1👏1
Кабинет истории Как ямайский дэнсхолл повлиял на современный поп и хип-хоп Современный поп и хип-хоп во многом обязаны музыкальной культуре Ямайки. Dancehall оформился в конце 1970-х, но его корни уходят в reggae, dub и sound system-культуру. Одна из ключевых идей — riddim и versioning: один инструментальный ритм мог становиться основой для десятков разных вокальных версий. Такая модель изменила само представление…
❤33👍13🍓4💩3🔥1
VIBE Snoop Dogg - Who Am I (What's My Name) 1993 Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
👍37❤13🤔4🔥2😭2
Чего нового ? В комментариях делимся не только треками, но и свежими новостями из музыкальной культуры ❤️ Погнали ❤️ Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤17🔥7👍3
23 сентября 1930 года родился американский эстрадный певец и пианист Рэй Чарльз (Ray Charles) Пел в различных стилях, особенно прославился как исполнитель в стилях соул и ритм-энд-блюз. В США считается одним из наиболее значительных музыкантов послевоенного времени. Рэю Чарльзу принадлежат около 70 альбомов. Слушать YouTube / Яндекс музыка / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤76🎉33👍19❤🔥10👏3🔥2🍓1🍾1
VIBE Ozzy Osborne - Crazy Train (live) Музыкальное чтиво | мы в TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
🔥117❤19👍12❤🔥2👏1👻1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @muzika_chtivo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой музыкант использовал самодельный «Frippertronics» — систему задержки и зацикливания звука на магнитной ленте?
- Brian Eno35%
- Robert Fripp47%
- Terry Riley8%
- Adrian Belew10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой альбом считается первым рок-альбомом, полностью записанным с использованием восьмидорожечной технологии?
- Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band54%
- Pet Sounds19%
- Blonde on Blonde14%
- Are You Experienced13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой композитор одним из первых использовал магнитофонную ленту как самостоятельный музыкальный инструмент?
- Pierre Schaeffer21%
- John Cage33%
- Karlheinz Stockhausen31%
- Iannis Xenakis15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой сингл стал первым коммерчески успешным произведением, практически полностью построенным на семпле из песни другой группы?
- Rapper's Delight — The Sugarhill Gang29%
- Pump Up the Volume — MARRS25%
- Buffalo Gals — Malcolm McLaren25%
- Paid in Full (Coldcut Remix) — Eric B. & Rakim21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой музыкант первым применил термин «Fourth World Music» для описания своего творчества?
- Brian Eno35%
- Jon Hassell12%
- Ry Cooder7%
- Peter Gabriel46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой джазовый музыкант считается одним из первых, кто начал использовать круговое (непрерывное) дыхание в импровизации?
- John Coltrane47%
- Sonny Rollins21%
- Rahsaan Roland Kirk12%
- Evan Shaw Parker19%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kammotor · 24,4223 postsГлаза КОТа. Нет 😸уйне!
@glazakota · 232 postsРок для души
@rokAndrew · 212 postsZyablik
@INFPZyablik · 971 postМузыкальный Гурман
@musical_gourmet · 791 post🎐‧₊˚ облачный тупичок ˚₊‧🎐
@oblachnytupichok · 931 postNΘRMΛΝ STΑΝSFIΞLD
@pkarabanov · 2831 postЗаписки Пожилой Совы
@rev_owl · 881 postСЕКРЕТЫ ВЗЛОМА ПЧЁЛ
@sekrety_vzloma_pchel · 2591 postУлица Шазам | Музыкальные истории
@shazam_street · 6611 postSway Media
@swaymedia · 1,8001 postSway Media | Price
@swayprice · 1051 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@allthatjazz · 6,5411 post(Богемный) Люфт Чат
@bogemniy_luft · 2371 postЦентр «Зотов»
@centrezotov · 22,3341 postDoom Metal Bunkern🕷
@doom_metal_bunkern · 5,8601 postENZRO
@enzromusic · 911 postИСТОРИЯ РОКА 🎸
@hisRock · 4,5811 postИстория Религий / Золотая Ветвь
@history_religions · 11,6181 postЕлена Конотопова
@KonotopovaEA · 2,5571 postМюзикл «Плакса»
@plaksamusical · 7221 postVintage Mag.
@vntmg · 1,5541 postЗаписки Копейкина
@zapiskikopeikina · 2,8361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@melody_ritmy · 7,504#1
@hisRock · 4,581#2
@muslegends · 7,628#3
@meduzalive · 1,122,482#4
@oper_goblin · 494,224#5
@great_musicians · 3,530#6
@thequietplace · 51,332#7
@nerds · 415,438#8
@why4ch · 1,042,455#9
@stanculturetg · 31,492#10
@firmamelodiya · 36,174#11
@temalebedev · 970,618#12
@yaplakal · 422,290#13
@welcometomyisland · 243,415#14
@yurydud · 862,341#15
@brokendance · 80,315#16
@IconicRock · 1,352#17
@allrockinfo · 1,054#18
@cinematheque_tg · 8,869#19
@minaevlife · 318,588#20
@soundpalettes · 14,698#21
@monkeysandfilms · 6,092#22
@fotorock · 1,847#23
@kartiny_muzei_zhivopis · 121,465#24
@allthatjazz · 6,541#25
@fuckingenglish · 312,495#26
@whackdoor · 1,603,481#27
@retra · 165,509#28
@classicrocknews · 5,665#29
@kartiny_art_iskusstvo · 64,086#30
@rockultra · 6,755#31
@pushnoypro · 48,690#32
@muzakrug · 3,310#33
@muzbunkern · 18,656#34
@shongchannel · 219#35
@bluejjayway · 1,222#36
@sektasektanta · 1,163 (as read 24 August 2026)#37
@TheBadComedian · 605,674#38
@nocap · 55,189#39
@Have_a_nice_listening · 3,316#40
@sndkgram · 357,072#41
@rushuffle · 44,160#42
@cinemalandiya · 3,855#43
@beforethenight · 20,799#44
@superslowflow · 48,840#45
@bestdjchannel · 40,614#46
@Reddit · 162,484#47
@FBChu · 44,983#48
@memoriesfred · 1,214#49
@kammotor · 24,422#50
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,271#51
@mash · 3,110,586#52
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#53
@poster_pron · 19,007#54
@dvachannel · 938,773#55
@twitt_ota · 332,521#56
@kinopoisk · 806,604#57
@pekagame · 1,089,162#58
@exploitex · 2,041,128#59
@bestiariy_mif · 72,995#60
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#61
@beatles_ru · 2,926#62
@marvel4 · 212,349#63
@need2watch · 23,556#64
@cutterpool · 59,294#65
@muzei_tg · 53,616#66
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 165,339#67
@stupidthough · 6,848#68
@pIenka_ph · 5,487#69
@kinopoisk_soon · 106,432#70
@itfollowspub · 19,411#71
@iconic_film_directors · 8,209#72
@botcharov · 210,518#73
@artgallery · 195,341#74
@pravilamagru · 63,713#75
@kartiny_zhivopis_galereya · 85,644#76
@cherevatstreams · 149,295#77
@fotoartset · 49,501#78
@knigi_literatura · 260,681#79
@CosplayKartina · 14,443#80
@savanichi · 194,356#81
@x14x05x · 26,091#82
@gcl_tg · 43,461#83
@the_filmmaking · 4,120#84
@sixtyfourmag · 71,709#85
@Cronenberg1664 · 41,358#86
@kartiny_arteriart · 162,329#87
@goldchihuahua · 91,409#88
@sharemed · 218,993#89
@wtch_list · 7,168#90
@omanko · 113,987#91
@remizorro · 30,002#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@firmamelodiya · 36,174
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
@topornews77 · 37,799
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
@pushnoypro · 48,690
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@audio_freebook · 23,682
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
@Kinoklub_Michael · 21,299
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
@kino_i_golubi · 46,223
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@kammotor · 24,422
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
@muzei_tg · 53,616
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@kartiny_art_iskusstvo · 64,086
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@beforethenight · 20,799
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@kartiny_muzei_zhivopis · 121,465
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,271
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@kartiny_tg · 66,959
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@need2watch · 23,556
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@SodomAnd_Gomorrah · 32,915
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
@maneormone1 · 85,674
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@academicpavlov · 114,488
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@sculpturearts · 29,540
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
@mir_painting · 37,212
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
@bestiariy_mif · 72,995
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@sovetskiyplakat · 44,955
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
@kartiny_zhivopis_galereya · 85,644
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
@fotoartset · 49,501
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
@tim_philosophy · 67,686
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Музыкальное чтиво” (@muzika_chtivo), 53,111 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muzika_chtivo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.