Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TARKOVSKY

Channel

TARKOVSKY

@andreytarkovsky

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,552subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244807383
TypeChannel
Username@andreytarkovsky
Created11 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/andreytarkovsky

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5433,5603,551.56 August 2026 — 3,560 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,560 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,557 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,556 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,554 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,551 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,548 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,547 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,543 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,560 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,559 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,558 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,555 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,552 subscribers3,5526 August 202619 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 44 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,540–3,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:403,552-3
15 Sept 2026, 07:543,555-3
11 Sept 2026, 08:583,558-1
6 Sept 2026, 21:173,559-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:343,560+17
30 Aug 2026, 15:043,543-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:423,547-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:053,549+1
22 Aug 2026, 03:473,548-2
18 Aug 2026, 20:433,550-1
16 Aug 2026, 04:273,551-3
12 Aug 2026, 16:463,554-2
9 Aug 2026, 08:413,556-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:063,557-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:343,560no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:313,560first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10365.2%
❤‍🔥1710.8%
🔥116.96%
👍74.43%
🕊63.80%
53.16%
💔53.16%
👎31.90%
😢10.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC281 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шекспировские герои в интерпретации Андрея Тарковского: «В какой-то момент Гамлет сближается с Иваном из первого полнометражного фильма Тарковского. Так же как Иван, он становится на путь мщения, однако, если Иван мстит врагам за смерть матери и сестры, то Гамлет мстит не только Клавдию, но отчасти и матери за смерть отца <....> Гертруда грациозна и привлекательна, слишком молода для очевидно неюного, лысоватого сы

❤‍🔥92🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC519 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Вопреки утверждению многих критиков, Тарковский уверен, что метафора не свойственна кинематографу. Кинематографический образ отражает для него жизнь и отнюдь не является каким-то зашифрованным понятием. И образ текучей воды – это не метафора времени, а прежде всего образ текучей воды». [«Реальности и сновидения Андрея Тарковского», Виктор Мазин]

25🕊5👎3

22 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,700 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Зеркало»: натюрморты 🍎

35🔥9👍7❤‍🔥31🕊1

5 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,130 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Андрей Тарковский в кино и в театре: «Даже поверхностный анализ корпуса воспоминаний о спектакле [«Гамлет»] и знакомство со сценической редакцией шекспировской пьесы позволяют выявить множество знаковых перекличек первого спектакля Тарковского с его «сновидческим» кинематографом. Это и повторяющисся из фильма в фильм темы (родителей и детей, дома и домашнего очага), мотивы и приемы (двойничество или лжедвойничество

84

29 Jun 2026, 15:49 UTC909 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Внимание к деталям у Тарковского как будто призвано отмечать их красоту. Но Тарковский не стремится к красоте, к соблазнению реальностью яви, к ловушкам воображаемого плена. Более того, подобную красоту он из кино изымает: «Когда очень красиво, Андрей Арсеньевич тоже не любил. Был такой совершенно саврасовский план подхода отца к Переделкину; кто-то сказал: «О, как красиво!» — и он сразу «чик» — и вырезал», – «Реа

18

23 Jun 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,020 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cinemagraphiePhoto

toska* «Ни одно английское существительное не передает всех оттенков этого слова. На самом глубоком и мучительном уровне это чувство сильнейшего душевного страдания, часто не имеющее объяснимой причины. В менее тяжелых вариантах оно может быть ноющей душевной болью, стремлением непонятно к чему, болезненным томлением, смутным беспокойством, терзанием ума, неясной тягой. В конкретных случаях оно означает стремление к

15❤‍🔥5💔5😢1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @andreytarkovsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,265
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TARKOVSKY” (@andreytarkovsky), 3,552 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andreytarkovsky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.