Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 27 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,018–2,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:58
2,025
-4
13 Sept 2026, 21:41
2,029
-10
10 Sept 2026, 04:57
2,039
-8
4 Sept 2026, 11:40
2,047
-6
1 Sept 2026, 06:13
2,053
-9
28 Aug 2026, 21:07
2,062
-3
25 Aug 2026, 12:36
2,065
-4
22 Aug 2026, 22:59
2,069
-1
22 Aug 2026, 03:30
2,070
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
413 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
233
56.4%
❤🔥
55
13.3%
👍
34
8.23%
🕊
20
4.84%
⚡
16
3.87%
😢
15
3.63%
💯
13
3.15%
💔
10
2.42%
👌
6
1.45%
🎉
3
0.726%
👏
3
0.726%
✍
2
0.484%
😇
1
0.242%
😘
1
0.242%
😭
1
0.242%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 413 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🦋 از چاه های زندگی (سختی ها و گرفتاری ها) نگران نشوید، چه بسا خداوند #موفقیت و #خوشبختی شما را مانند حضرت یوسف (ع) از چاهی رقم بزند.
🦋لَقَدْ كَانَ فِي يُوسُفَ وَإِخْوَتِهِ آيَاتٌ لِلسَّائِلِينَ ﴿٧﴾
🌺بی تردید [در داستان] یوسف و برادرانش نشانه هایی [از ربوبیّت، رحمت و لطف خدا] برای مردم کنجکاو است. (۷)
سوره یوسف 🌿
❤️@Allaho_Mahakum⭐️
.
🍁
شاید این جمع بماند تو نمانی دیگر
شاید این خنده زدن را نتوانی دیگر
شاید این راه در آغاز به پایان نرسد
شاید این یوسف گم گشته به کنعان نرسد
شاید این لقمه که خوب است برای بدنت
آخرین لقمه ی شام تو بوَد در دهنت
قصد داری بروی کافه به همراهِ کسی
شاید امروز بمیری به قرارت نرسی!
چقدَر عید بیاید که نباشیم رفیق!
داخل گور بپوسیم و بپاشیم رفیق!
کاش باور بکند هر که مرا می خوانَد:
« نیستی » بیشتر از بودنمان می ماند
@Allah…
🍁
مقصدی نیست؛ بیا فلسفه بافی نکنیم
هرکسی کارِ بدی کرد تلافی نکنیم
ما چه باشیم و نباشیم؛ جهان در گذر است
کاش باور بکنی فرصتمان مختصر است
شاید این چای که از عطر خوشش مدهوشی
آخرین چای تو باشد که از آن می نوشی!
شاید امروزِ شما ختم به فردا نشود
شاید این جسم بخوابد وَ دگر پا نشود
شاید آن فرد که میخواست کنارت باشد
صبح فردا چو گُلی روی مزارت باشد!
شاید این نور که بر صورتِ تو تابیده!
روزِ دیگر دمد و چهره ی تو پوسیده!
…
❤12😢3✍1❤🔥1👌1👍1💔1💯1
Signed 𝐬𝐨𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐥
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Allaho_Mahakum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سهیل شیوافر | درآمدزایی اینترنتی @soheil_shivafar · 28,118 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
کپشن خـــاص @captionkhaas · 61,732 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🤍《وَاللهُ مَعَکُم》🤍” (@Allaho_Mahakum), 2,025 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Allaho_Mahakum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
