Channel
@soheil_shivafar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,061subscribers
-1,759 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002040675875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soheil_shivafar |
| Description | 📚 آموزش و اجرای مدلهای نوین کسبوکار اینترنتی 📈 رشد فروش، برندینگ و توسعه درآمد 🎯 سیستمهای عملیاتی قابل اجرا برای افراد و کسبوکارها 🌍 آزادی در زمان و مکان کار 🤝 ساخت جامعهای از افراد در مسیر رشد و پیشرفت 📞 ارتباط مستقیم: 09331967980 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soheil_shivafar |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 27,061 | -37 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 27,098 | -21 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 27,119 | -32 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 27,151 | -38 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:45 | 27,189 | -41 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:48 | 27,230 | -25 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:56 | 27,255 | -29 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 27,284 | -34 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 27,318 | -22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 27,340 | -29 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 27,369 | -23 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 27,392 | -33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 27,425 | -29 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 27,454 | -25 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 27,479 | -26 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 27,505 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 27,519 | -21 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 27,540 | -27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 27,567 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 27,578 | first reading |
777 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 149 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 777 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,508 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 777 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 777 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 431 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
همون سردرگمیِ «از کجا شروع کنم» که هر روز، بیجواب میمونه، اینجاست که جواب میگیره. توی اپلیکیشن آکادمی یه بخش هست به اسم «آزمونها و ابزارها»؛ جایی که آزمونهای کوتاه و ابزارهای مشخص، پشتِ سرِ هم چیده شدن — به جای اینکه «از کجا شروع کنم»، روزها توی ذهنت بچرخه و هیچوقت، قدم نشه. چطوری ازش استفاده کنی؟ ۱. وارد اپلیکیشن شو و «آزمونها و ابزارها» رو باز کن ۲. یه آزمونِ کوتاه که امروز به کارت میاد انتخاب کن ۳. جوابش …
عصر یکشنبه، یه وقتِ خاصه: نه صبحه که شروع کنی، نه شبه که تموم کنی. عصر یکشنبه، وقتِ «یه کارِ کوچیکِ آروم»ه. عصر یکشنبهت رو با چی پر میکنی؟ با یه آموزشِ کوتاه؟ با تموم کردنِ یه کارِ نصفه؟ با نوشتنِ سه قدمِ هفتهی تازه؟ یا با یه استراحتِ واقعی که ذهنت رو خلوت کنه؟ هر کدوم، یه مدلِ عصر یکشنبهست. «آموزشِ کوتاه» یعنی یکشنبه، فقط شروعِ کار نیست. «تموم کردنِ نصفه» یعنی یه بار، از ذهن برداشته میشه. «نوشتنِ سه قدم» یعنی…
یه ذهنِ مشخص، معمولاً سه تا عدد داره؛ نه بیشتر. عددِ اول: چقدر میرسه؟ عددِ دوم: چقدر، خرجِ ثابته؟ عددِ سوم: چقدر، برای قدمِ مشخصِ این هفته کنار گذاشته میشه؟ حسابِ سادهش اینه: وقتی هر سه عدد، مشخص باشن، هر قدمِ بعدی، معلومه. وقتی یه عدد، مبهم باشه، همهی قدمها، مبهم میشن. مثلاً اگه ورودی، مشخص باشه ولی خرجِ ثابت، نه؛ نمیدونی چقدر، واقعاً دستته. اگه خرج، مشخص باشه ولی قدمِ مشخص، نه؛ نمیدونی پولت، به کجا میره.…
«فردا ادامه میدم»، جملهی قشنگیه؛ چون امروز، هیچ کاری نمیخواد. ولی همین جمله، یکشنبه رو هم خراب میکنه. چطور؟ وقتی «فردا» رو برای ادامهدادن انتخاب میکنی، یکشنبه، تبدیل میشه به «روزِ انتظار»؛ نه شروعِ واقعی، نه قدمِ واقعی. فقط یه روزِ معلق، بینِ شنبهی تمومشده و دوشنبهی نیومده. راهِ شکستنش، «ادامهی بزرگِ فردا» نیست؛ «ادامهی کوچیکِ امروز»ه. یه قدمِ پنجدقیقهایِ امروز، بهتر از یه ادامهی کاملِ فرداست. چون قد…
اگه هنوز نمیدونی از کجا شروع کنی، یه شروعِ کوچیک و رایگان، بهتر از یه نقشهی بزرگِ نصفهست. توی آکادمی، یه مینیدورهی رایگان هست که قدمهای اولِ ساختنِ کار از اینترنت رو، کوتاه و مشخص نشون میده: از پیدا کردنِ یه مهارتِ مشخص، تا رسوندنش به یه آدمِ مشخص. این مینیدوره، برای کسیه که میخواد اول، مسیر رو ببینه، بعد تصمیم بگیره. نه تعهدِ بزرگ، نه شروعِ سنگین؛ فقط چند قدمِ اول، با مثالهای مشخص. اگه امروز، یه قدمِ کو…
من سهیل شیوافرم؛ یکشنبهها، پشتِ صحنهی هفتهم رو نگاه میکنم. پشتِ صحنه، معمولاً قشنگ نیست: یه لیستِ نصفه، یه کاری که عقب افتاده، یه ایدهای که هنوز شروع نشده. ولی پشتِ صحنه، جاییه که هفتهی تازه، ساخته میشه. من، یکشنبهها، سه تا چیز رو جدا میکنم: چیزی که تموم شد و باید جشنِ کوچیک بگیره، چیزی که نصفه موند و امروز، قدمِ بعدشه، و چیزی که فقط «دیده شد» و باید از لیست، حذف بشه. حذف کردن، به اندازهی انجام دادن مهمه…
همون عادتِ مطالعه که همیشه «از فردا» شروع میشه، اینجاست که امروز شروع میشه. توی اپلیکیشن آکادمی یه بخش هست به اسم «کتاب دروناپ»؛ جایی که کتابها، سرِ جاشون چیده شدن — به جای اینکه مطالعه، همیشه به «یه روزِ دیگه» سپرده بشه و هیچوقت، شروع نشه. چطوری ازش استفاده کنی؟ ۱. وارد اپلیکیشن شو و «کتاب دروناپ» رو باز کن ۲. یه کتاب که امروز به کارت میاد انتخاب کن ۳. همون یه فصلِ کوتاه رو امروز بخون و یه نکتهش رو بنویس م…
بعضی باورها، از سالها پیش توی ذهن مونده: «پول، همیشه کم میاد»، «پولدار شدن، فقط برای یه عدهی خاصه»، «شروع کردن، دیر شده». این باورها، صدای بلند ندارن؛ آروم، زیرِ تصمیمها میشینن. وقتی میخوای قدمی برداری، همین باورها، یه جملهی کوتاه میگن: «به دردت نمیخوره» — و قدم، عقب میافته. ذهن، مثلِ یه کاناله: هر چیزی که ازش رد بشه، به همون سمتی میره که کانال، هدایتش میکنه. اگه کانال، با باورهای قدیمی ساخته شده باشه، …
یه سؤالِ ساده: ذهن، اول پول رو میسازه، یا پول، اول ذهن رو؟ خیلیها فکر میکنن اول باید پول بیاد، بعد ذهن، آروم میشه و قدم برمیداره. ولی الگوی دانشجوهایی که جلو رفتن، برعکسه: اول، ذهن، یه نسخهی تازه گرفت؛ بعد، قدمها، یه مسیرِ تازه گرفتن؛ بعد، پول، سرِ جاش نشست. چطور؟ وقتی ذهن، «پول، زود تموم میشه» رو تکرار میکنه، هر تصمیمی، از همون نسخه میاد: خرجِ بیقانون، قدمِ نصفه، شروعِ تازهی هر روز. وقتی نسخه، عوض میشه…
یکشنبه، خیلیها دنبالِ «بردِ بزرگ» میگردن؛ ولی هفته، با بردهای کوچیک جلو میره، نه با بردِ بزرگ. بردِ کوچیک، یعنی یه کاری که امروز، تموم میشه: یه آموزشِ دهدقیقهای که تا آخر دیده میشه، یه خرجی که نوشته میشه، یه قدمِ کوچیکی که برداشته میشه. بردِ بزرگ، یعنی یه چیزی که آخرِ هفته، هنوز «قراره» بشه. راهِ درستش، جمع کردنِ بردهای کوچیکه: هر روز، یه بردِ کوچیک. آخرِ هفته، پنج تا بردِ کوچیک، یه هفتهی جلو رفتهست؛ ولی…
امروز، بیشتر به کدوم نیاز داری؟ به یه ادامهدادن که قدمِ دیروز رو جلو ببری؟ به یه جمعبندی که هفته رو مرتب کنه؟ به یه قدمِ کوچیک که یه کارِ نصفه رو تموم کنه؟ یا به یه آموزشِ کوتاه که یه نکتهی تازه بهت بده؟ هر کدوم، یه نیازِ واقعیِ امروزه. «ادامهدادن» یعنی دیروز، یه قدم جلو رفته. «جمعبندی» یعنی کارها زیاده و باید مرتب بشن. «قدمِ کوچیک» یعنی یه کار، نصفه مونده. «آموزشِ کوتاه» یعنی یه نکته، به کارت میاد. توی ذهنت،…
یه الگو، بین دانشجوهایی که جلو رفتن، بارها دیده شده: اونها، نسخهی ذهنشون رو عوض کردن، قبل از اینکه پولشون عوض بشه. نسخهی قدیمی، این بود: «پول، همیشه کم میاد». نسخهی تازه، این شد: «پول، با یه قانونِ مشخص، سرِ جاش میمونه». قدمِ اولشون، یه مهارتِ مشخص بود، برای یه آدمِ مشخص، با یه پیشنهادِ مشخص. نه همهچیز برای همهکس؛ یه چیزِ مشخص برای یه نفرِ مشخص. نتیجههاشون، با گارانتی ۷ روزه همراه بوده و سرعتِ نتیجه، به تلا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 777 posts we hold for @soheil_shivafar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بزرگترین مانع پول درآوردنت چیه؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
موافق هستین از این به بعد طرحها، وامها، امتیازات و هر امکانات ویژه دولتی که شرایطش باز میشه رو سریع اخبار و اطلاعیهها، آموزش و نحوه دریافتشون رو واستون همینجا توی کانال بذارم؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 777 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@soheil_shivafar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی شیوافر | دانشگاه ثروتسازی” (@soheil_shivafar), 27,061 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soheil_shivafar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.