This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
18 measurements spanning 19 days, net -1,192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,393–71,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 00:47
68,728
-96
25 Aug 2026, 23:42
68,824
-115
24 Aug 2026, 22:13
68,939
-281
23 Aug 2026, 09:12
69,220
-214
21 Aug 2026, 23:55
69,434
-182
20 Aug 2026, 19:19
69,616
-208
19 Aug 2026, 15:55
69,824
-106
18 Aug 2026, 19:22
69,930
-80
17 Aug 2026, 20:05
70,010
-76
16 Aug 2026, 16:56
70,086
-193
14 Aug 2026, 23:34
70,279
-151
13 Aug 2026, 16:38
70,430
-178
12 Aug 2026, 15:54
70,608
-75
11 Aug 2026, 15:22
70,683
-155
10 Aug 2026, 12:41
70,838
-126
9 Aug 2026, 11:31
70,964
+1,100
8 Aug 2026, 12:38
69,864
-56
7 Aug 2026, 14:16
69,920
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.87%
avg views ÷ 68,728 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,090
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.266%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
52 (12 July 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
268,145
Reactions total
713
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,150
Videos
≈113
Links
≈414
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
885 reactions across 52 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
711
80.3%
🔥
52
5.88%
❤🔥
48
5.42%
👏
37
4.18%
🎉
24
2.71%
👍
8
0.904%
🥰
5
0.565%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 885reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تاسست من المعاصر افضل تاسيس مافيه افضل منه
+ التاسيس لازم تحفظه صم زي اسمك وكل مره حاول تراجعه من مقاطع المراجعه
و المية مع استاذ عماد اعتبرها مضمونه والله يجزاه خير
ذي محاولتي الثالثه وذا كله بفضل الله ثم دوره استاذ عماد
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😊✅
🔵 شــارك تجربتك ودرجتك وفرحتك مع طلاب المعاصر الــآن عبر الحسابات الآتية❤️ :
👉 @Doctor_Fatema 💜
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
أشكر العمدة على تأسيسه الرائع جدًا بفضل الله ثم هو صار التدريب أسهل بكثييير و الحمدلله قفلت الكمي
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😊✅
🔵 شــارك تجربتك ودرجتك وفرحتك مع طلاب المعاصر الــآن عبر الحسابات الآتية❤️ :
👉 @Doctor_Fatema 💜
اول شي اللهم لك الحمد حاب اشكر الاستاذ عماد الجزيري لو لا الله ثم هو ماكان وصلت لهذهِ الدرجه
الصراحه كانت تجربه جميله مرت بحلوها ومرها بدأ مشواري في القدرات في الاجازه الصيفيه قبل حوالي ٨ اشهر بكتاب المعاصر٩ خلصت وقتها التأسيس في شهر ونص كانت على بدايه الدراسه طريقه مذاكرتي التأسيس هي من افضل الطرق بالنسبه لي إلا وهي الكتابه وقتها اخذت دفتر وكنت كل درس اشوفه مع عماد اكتب القوانين حقتها ولما احل الاسئله اي سؤال له فك…
100 مع افضل تأسييييييس🫡🫡
من ثالث محاولة لي وكانت كل المحاولات التأسيس مع العمده عمااااد الجزيري الافضل
الدرجة ماجت بيوم وليلة جت بعد تعب وجهد دام لاشهر
القاعدة المهمة: تأسيس قوي + فههههم من قللللب + تركيييييز بدون تشتت =100 باذن الله
مشيت بالتدريب بكل راحه لاني بديت من اساس قوي جدًااااا
توكلو على الله وحطو كل جهدكم واعملوا بالاسباب والله لا يضيع لكم تعب يااارب
*الوتر الوتر الوتر*
اليوم انا ضمنت مقعدي بالجامعة ولله ال…
الحمدلله جبت ١٠٠ كمي من أول محاولة بفضل الله ثم العمده مره كان الأختبار سهل تأسست معاه بس وكانت أحلى فتره حقيقي تأسيس من حديد مره كان مستواي لا والحمدالله تطور والأختبار كان مويه مويه مو على قد الخوف وذحين اقدر انزل درجتي زي الناس الي كنت اشوفهم(ادعولي اقفل ١٠٠ المحاولة الثانيه) عليكم بالوتر والدعاء والله سحر وأفعلو بالأسبا
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😊✅
🔵 شــارك تجربتك ودرجتك وفرحتك مع طلاب المعاصر الــآن عبر الحسابات الآتية❤️ :
👉 @Do…
سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
هذي درجتي الحمدلله
الله يوفق العمده
ياخي تاسيسه وشرحه اسطوري
واخذت من عنده اكثر من عشرين بنك الله يسعده يشيخ
تاسيس اسطوري بمعنى الكلمه
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😊✅
🔵 شــارك تجربتك ودرجتك وفرحتك مع طلاب المعاصر الــآن عبر الحسابات الآتية❤️ :
👉 @Doctor_Fatema 💜
ثاني محاولة والحمدلله بفضل الله قفلت الكمي، وبإذن الله الثالثة ثابتة وأقفل القدرات بشكل كامل.
تأسست مع عماد، والله يجزاه خير ما قصر أبدًا، لكن للأسف قعدت أسوف تقريبًا سنة، وبعدها رجعت ودخلت ملخص التأسيس للعمده، والشي هذا فرق معي بشكل كبير جدًا ولله الحمد.
ولو بنصح أي طالب يختبر قدرات، فأول وأهم نصيحة عندي: القرب من الله والابتعاد عن ذنوب الخلوات، فوالله مايمحق الرزق وعدم التوفيق والبركه في حياتك غيرها .
وبعدها طبعًا …
الحمد لله أولًا وأخيرًا 🤍
اليوم حاب أشارككم درجتي في القدرات، جبت 100 في الكمي.
بصراحة بالبداية كان مستواي في الكمي زفت، وما كنت أتوقع أوصل لهذي الدرجة، لكن مع الوقت ومع التدريب بدأت أفهم طريقة الأسئلة وأتطور بشكل كبير
ومن أكثر الأشياء اللي ساعدتني دورة الأستاذ عماد، كنت أتابع الدورة وأطبق مع الشرح، ومع كثرة التدريب والمراجعة بدأت أشوف فرق واضح في مستواي ياخوان ولله اني كنت ميح في الرياضيات لاكن العمدة غيررررر مفهو…
اول محاولة فقط تأسست مع المعاصر ٩ قبل الاختبار وجبت هذي الدرجة
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😊✅
🔵 شــارك تجربتك ودرجتك وفرحتك مع طلاب المعاصر الــآن عبر الحسابات الآتية❤️ :
👉 @Doctor_Fatema 💜
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Almoaser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 162,276 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تسريبات قدرات مجاني ملفات فيديوهات ملخصات اختبارات @Qudratonline · 46,409 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
المعاصر قدرات وتحصيلي - عماد الجزيري @vip_qustion · 311,077 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
دليل مجموعات جَبَل ⛰ @Jabal_Groups · 109,400 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
مظله | قدرات لفظي @MezlaQ · 129,425 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
تحصيلي علمي | راكان علي @RK_T7si · 48,483 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
سحاب للقدرات ☁️ @Sahab_q1 · 73,521 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
تسريبات سايفر 2026 @CypherDojo · 217,730 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
كالفن @k727xd · 91,633 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
تسريبات مظلة - قدرات & @ne_wb · 121,792 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
تسريبات مظله - قدرات @MezlaQ3 · 319,028 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
تسريبات الكنز | تحصيلي 2026 @AlKanz1 · 66,218 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
قدرات قرناس 🐤 | مجانية @QirnasEdu · 97,263 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تجارب طلاب المعاصر” (@Almoaser), 68,728 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Almoaser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.