Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 40 days, net -2,400. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,082–36,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:16
33,442
-58
16 Sept 2026, 15:58
33,500
-87
14 Sept 2026, 16:37
33,587
-45
13 Sept 2026, 03:19
33,632
-85
11 Sept 2026, 01:57
33,717
-114
8 Sept 2026, 03:19
33,831
-153
5 Sept 2026, 02:38
33,984
-64
3 Sept 2026, 07:36
34,048
-54
2 Sept 2026, 02:34
34,102
-82
1 Sept 2026, 01:58
34,184
-71
30 Aug 2026, 23:44
34,255
-80
29 Aug 2026, 22:26
34,335
-65
29 Aug 2026, 01:17
34,400
-65
28 Aug 2026, 02:53
34,465
-63
27 Aug 2026, 05:22
34,528
-48
26 Aug 2026, 06:43
34,576
-90
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
34,666
-106
24 Aug 2026, 04:22
34,772
-174
22 Aug 2026, 08:55
34,946
-121
20 Aug 2026, 21:58
35,067
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
25
Videos
3
Links
11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
617 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
275
44.6%
😴
76
12.3%
🤡
70
11.3%
😐
52
8.43%
👍
39
6.32%
🔥
37
6.00%
😭
25
4.05%
🙊
9
1.46%
❤🔥
7
1.13%
🫡
6
0.972%
🎃
4
0.648%
🦄
4
0.648%
👏
3
0.486%
💘
2
0.324%
💯
2
0.324%
😍
2
0.324%
😘
2
0.324%
👾
1
0.162%
💋
1
0.162%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-يجب على كل طالب التسجيل على قناة ”فرسان للقادرات“. سيتم نشر أحدث المعلومات حول التدريب والجدول الزمني وتفاصيل الدورة التدريبية الأخرى هناك. ‼️
-لا تنسى التسجيل حتى لا تفوتك معلومات مهمة عن تدريبك! 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
https://t.me/ttdpse_bot🤖❤️
https://t.me/ttdpse_bot🤖❤️
🤖❤️https://t.me/ttdpse_bot
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
اي مختبر ذاكر من ملفنا اتمنى يرسل درجته
عشان نستمر والكل يشوف درجات طلابنا لابطال
@tt6_q
وفالكم اعلى الدرجات والمناصب في الدنيا والاخره
يعني كل مازادت البنوك مثلا
الحين يجيك ٦٠٪
اذا زادت ١٠٠٪
❤32🤡8❤🔥4😭4🎃2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gg_mmd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@gg_mmd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ttdpse_bot named in 4 posts, 11 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مساعد في القدرات @gg_vvb · 22,028 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
دوره لفظي فرسان @gg_gppp · 32,037 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
تجارب طلاب المعاصر @Almoaser · 68,696 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
سحاب للقدرات ☁️ @Sahab_q1 · 72,356 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
طلاب محمد زيادة @mohamedzeyada2023 · 28,583 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
بنوك مصباح | قدرات - الأقسام الأكثر تكرارًا يوميًا @M9BA7Q3 · 84,144 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
المرشد للقدرات @qudrat_free · 274,761 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
المعاصر قدرات وتحصيلي - عماد الجزيري @vip_qustion · 329,879 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
بنك القدرات @Quodraat · 27,069 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
تسريبات مظله - قدرات @MezlaQ3 · 312,938 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
المنصف في القدرات @MahmoudMonsef · 291,149 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
قناة تحصيلي وتد 💯⚡️ @WTD_tahsiliQ · 37,336 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
منصة أينشتاين | تحصيلي @hjjhhhjjnkkjhgg1234 · 381,746 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 August 2026
كاف | قناة القدرات @kaafacademey · 26,491 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
كويزات - أكاديمية الحوت @Alhut_Gd · 34,361 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 September 2026
منصة جهاد للقدرات والتحصيلي @Jehadmajed · 35,475 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
مظلة | قدرات 📌 مظله لفضي @Mezla3 · 50,215 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
شركة أسياف للاستثمار @aseaf1989 · 48,737 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
كالفن @k727xd · 89,285 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
فرسان للقدرات @ttdpse · 75,796 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 19 August 2026
تسريبات سايفر 2026 @CypherDojo · 212,287 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
كويزات لفظي | أبواب @Abwaabs24 · 56,713 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
حيرة القدرات @qudraat_m · 32,580 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
مظله | قدرات لفظي @MezlaQ · 127,530 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كمي فرسان” (@gg_mmd), 33,442 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gg_mmd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.