Channel
@Alpha_degenz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,185subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001513943120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alpha_degenz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alpha_degenz |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 4,185 | +5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 4,180 | +6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 4,174 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 4,175 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 4,176 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,174 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 4,181 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 4,188 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 4,194 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 4,202 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 4,200 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 4,206 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 4,196 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 4,182 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 4,182 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
311 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 185 | 59.5% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 11.6% | |
| 🤯 | 28 | 9.00% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 8.68% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 4.50% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 2.25% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.643% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.643% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.643% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پروژه Ondo perps به طور رندوم 100دلار واریز کرده به اکانتای کاربرایی که دو شرط زیر رو داشتن: 1-یک میلیون دلار حجم داشته باشن داخل هایپر لیکویید 2-اکانت Ondo perps ساخته بودن ولی واریزی انجام نداده بودن بهش! واقعیت اینکه شرایط خیلی رندومی هست و خیلیا نمیگیرن اینو چون اونیکه یه میلیون دلار حجم زده داخل هایپر طبیعتا رو این پروژه هم اکانت ساخته و واریز کرده! بازم میتونین چک کنین اکانت خودتون رو! توییت تیم https://app.on…
❤12🤨7
اینا هم تو Ama که الان توی دیسکورد داشتن ایردراپشون رو تایید کردن که قراره به ۳ گروه داده بشه. ۱.کسایی که تسک های سایت هاشو انجام میدن. ۲.کسایی که رول های دیسکوردش رو گرفتن. ۳.کسایی که براش تولید محتوا میکنن(احتمالا زیاد تو کایتو کمپین خواهند داشت).
❤13🤝3😁1
احتمالا این چن وقت اسم پروژه Axis Robotics رو شنیده باشین . تازه امروز سیستم پوینت دهی خودشون رو شروع کردن و Epoch اولشون هستش. از فعالیت های قبلی کسایی که فعال بودن اسنپ شات گرفتن و بهشون پوینت تعلق میگره. توی توییتشون کامل توضیح دادن که چه چیزایی مهمی براشون توی پوینت . LINK https://x.com/axisrobotics/status/2084279833253818489?s=20
❤6👍3👎2
البته اینم بگم که درامد هاشون خیلی متغیره و فصل هایی که بازار خوب بوده درآمدهای وحشتناکی داشتن پس اگه روی بیس فعال بودید این چند ماه هم پارو بزنید ، تا ببینیم چی میشه.
❤14👍2
اینطوری پیش بره به جای ایردراپ ، باید گلریزون کنیم یه چیزی هم ما بهشون بدیم😆
😁19😎2❤1
⭕️گزارش مالی ناامیدکننده کوین بیس؛ افت حجم معاملات، درآمد این صرافی را کاهش داد 🔸 صرافی ارز دیجیتال کوینبیس در گزارش مالی سهماهه دوم سال ۲۰۲۶، زیان خالص ۳۵۹ میلیون دلاری ثبت کرد؛ نتیجهای که ضعیفتر از انتظار تحلیلگران والاستریت بود. 🔸 درآمد کوینبیس با کاهش ۱۴ درصدی نسبت به سهماهه قبل به ۱.۲۲ میلیارد دلار رسید که پایینتر از برآورد ۱.۲۹ میلیارد دلاری تحلیلگران بود. کاهش نوسانات و افت فعالیت معاملهگران در بازا…
❤6
ظرفیت 10 تا بیشتر شده میتونین استفاده کنین! https://polymarket.com/perps?c=01go7or3 #Poly
❤12😁5
تیم Kaito از جدیدترین محصول خودش یعنی Kaito Katalyst رونمایی کرد 🔥 تیم KaitoAI رسماً Kaito Katalyst رو معرفی کرد: یه سیستم پاداش هوشمند برای تولید کننده های محتوا که پروژهها فقط بابت نتیجه واقعی نه فارمری قراره ریوارد پرداخت کنند.! 🟩 چیکار میکنه؟ پروژهها با معیارهای شفاف (mindshare، کلیک، ثبتنام کاربر، دیپازیت، فعالیت داخل پلتفرم و ...) پاداش میدن. سازنده های محتوا که واقعاً توجه و کاربر میآرن، مستقیم پول یا…
❤11🤣5😁1
k25.ai یک استارتاپ سنگاپوری است که پلتفرمی ترکیبی از پخش زنده (Livestreaming) و بازارهای پیشبینی (Prediction Markets) با قدرت AI ساخته به تازگی ارزش گذاری ۲۵۰ میلیونی شده. میتونین با ۱۰ تا اینوایت به دیسکوردش رول Beta pioneer بگیرین . https://discord.gg/mjfaMcHGu بعدش تیکت باز میکنید درخواست میدین بهتون Access code میدن و میتونید ویت لیست ثبت نام کنید علاوه بر این میتونید در ایونت هاش شرکت کنید و براش تولید محتو…
❤12
رنکتون رو داخل ویت لیست پرپ Arcus چک کنین دوباره ! طبق توییت تیم گفته میشه اونایی که رو لایتر حجم زده بودن تغییر کرده رنکشون. یه نکته دیگ هم این که رو اسپاتش مداوم حجم بزنین رو سهام و کریپتو. این میتونه رنکتون رو داخل ویت لیست خیلی بهتر کنه! دلیل اینکه اینقد رو ویت لیست پرپ Arcus تاکید میشه اینکه شما هرچقد زودتر داخل پلتفرم فعالیت کنین پوینت بیشتری خیلی راحت جمع میکنین بدون اینکه رقابتی باشه ! مثل اوایل لایتر یا های…
❤11
Onchain Sybil Resistance(Base verify) بیس به تازگی از Base verify رونمایی کرده؛ قابلیتی که میتواند یکی از مهمترین زیرساختهای آینده اکوسیستم Base باشد! اما دقیقاً چه کاری انجام میدهد؟ تا امروز اگر پروژهای میخواست ایردراپ یا کمپینی برگزار کند، یک مشکل بزرگ داشت: یک نفر میتوانست دهها یا حتی صدها ولت بسازد و چندین بار پاداش بگیرد. برای جلوگیری از این موضوع، پروژهها مجبور بودند از سرویسهای خارجی مثل Gitcoin P…
❤16
یه آپدیتی دادن که میتونه مارو نزدیک تر کنه به توکن Base🔥 https://x.com/i/status/2082129046721253717 #Base
❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Alpha_degenz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alpha Degens” (@Alpha_degenz), 4,185 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alpha_degenz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.