💵به شدت بوی جنگ میاد فعلا مراقب باشید فعلا نظارهگر باشید .
👍55❤9😁6🔥5👎2🥰2👏1

Channel
@icoandidoupdate
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
615,971subscribers
-108,643 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315170522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @icoandidoupdate |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/icoandidoupdate |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 615,971 | -1,547 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 617,518 | -2,079 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:18 | 619,597 | -1,590 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:11 | 621,187 | -1,259 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:49 | 622,446 | -1,274 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:15 | 623,720 | -2,191 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 625,911 | -2,332 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 628,243 | -1,741 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 629,984 | -2,114 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 632,098 | -1,906 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 634,004 | -1,445 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 635,449 | -1,707 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 637,156 | -2,469 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:35 | 639,625 | -3,215 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 642,840 | +17,147 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 625,693 | -1,592 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 627,285 | -1,403 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 628,688 | -1,075 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 629,763 | -1,690 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 631,453 | first reading |
102 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 340,250 |
| Reactions total | 2,759 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,750 reactions across 100 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,253 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 2,866 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1,960 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 992 | 7.21% | |
| 😁 | 780 | 5.67% | |
| 👎 | 539 | 3.92% | |
| 🥰 | 484 | 3.52% | |
| 🤯 | 308 | 2.24% | |
| 😢 | 238 | 1.73% | |
| 😱 | 142 | 1.03% | |
| 🐳 | 106 | 0.771% | |
| 👌 | 82 | 0.596% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @icoandidoupdate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💵به شدت بوی جنگ میاد فعلا مراقب باشید فعلا نظارهگر باشید .
👍55❤9😁6🔥5👎2🥰2👏1
💵تارگت لانگ طلا زده شد نوش جونتون 3950 رو تاج کرد 💰
👏50👍33❤19🔥15🥰2
💵اونای که طلا دارن حتما این پست توی X ببین و حمایت کنید به زودی 100 دلار قرعه کشی میکنیم توی توییتر: https://x.com/navidshokriyan/status/2116627749095813517
🔥75❤41👍24🥰6🐳1🤯1
🤴عزیزای دل تحلیل طلا یا همون #XAUT بریم به برسی کنیم : قیمت فعلی طلا روی محدوده 3873$ هست همین که حمایت 3980 تا 4000 دلار از دست داده خودش نشونه ریزش بیشتره توی میان مدت تارگت 3400 دلار میتونیم داشته باشیم . البته من خودم روی قیمت 3800 دلار یه پله سنگین ورود میزنم چون ممکنه نزارن تا 3400 دلار برسه. 💵 اگه فیوچرز میزنید میتونید نهایتا با اهرم 2 تا 5 فعلا لانگ بگیرید روی طلا برای تارگت 3920 تا 3950 💵درباره طلا داخل…
❤73👍36🔥10👏5👎4🐳2🥰2
📈ارز bless با تاخیر نزدیک 70 درصد بهمون سود داد نوش جونتون اگه داشتید💰 🤴تنها ارز بی خیر که نتونسته خوب سود بده بهمون در سه ماه اخیر TON هست🌃
❤59👍30🥰11🔥6😁6👏4😢3👌1
📈عزیزانی که گرام دارند میتونن نگهش دارن، تون میتونه کوتا مدت تا 1.6$ بره اصلا نگران نباشید فقط خریده پله ای رو یاد بگیرید قیمت الان 1.24 هست یک پله وارد شید یعنی اگه 100 دلار میخواید تون بخرید الان میتونید 20 دلار بخرید🫡
❤51🔥21👍19🐳4😁3😢3👏2🥰1
💵اونای که ایکس چک کردن اماده بودن برای ریزش قیمت #گرام سعی میکنیم بیشتر توییتر اکتیو باشیم🫡 #gram
👏62❤28👍10👎10😢6🐳4👌1
🪙تحلیل گرام برید چک کنید و با لایک و ریتویت حمایت کنید ❤️ https://x.com/navidshokriyan/status/2112895399300141246
❤74👍13🔥10🥰7👏4👎3🐳2
.مراقب خودتون و معاملاتتون باشید احتمال زیاد تا 48 ساعت دیگه کوه کلنگ بزنن📉
👍56😢32😱25❤23😁12🤯6👎4🐳2
🎮 ارز TIA نزدیک به 50 درصد سود داد میتونید کامل خارج شید نوش جونتون. یکم بازار اصلاح بده احتمالا باز سیگنالش میکنیم💰
❤69👏23🔥16👌5👍3🥰2🐳1
📈دوستان در صورتی که BTC# خلاف بازر رفت بالا یعنی تا 88k رفت آلت سیزن نیست اون لحضه تتر شید تو اون قیمت🫡
❤80👍46🔥35👏5🥰4👌2👎2🤯1
💰تحلیل BTC طبق چارت به نظرم BTC باید تا 75K بیاد و زیر این عدد فعلا نمیره یعنی توی 75K فرصت خرید هست. در صورتی صعودی هست که چند روز بالای 82K بمونه البته بعید میدونم 📉
👍55❤28😢22🐳5👎3👏3👌2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @icoandidoupdate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@icoandidoupdate edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @icoandidoupdate as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Navid Shokriyan (نوید شکریان)” (@icoandidoupdate), 615,971 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icoandidoupdate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.