Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,018–2,047 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 01:39
2,036
-3
10 Sept 2026, 01:54
2,039
-3
4 Sept 2026, 12:59
2,042
+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:26
2,041
+2
28 Aug 2026, 22:08
2,039
-5
25 Aug 2026, 11:35
2,044
+3
22 Aug 2026, 12:36
2,041
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:34
2,042
-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:43
2,043
+2
13 Aug 2026, 07:17
2,041
-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:38
2,042
+21
8 Aug 2026, 01:51
2,021
-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:31
2,024
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
289 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
187
64.7%
👍
51
17.6%
🤣
15
5.19%
😁
10
3.46%
👎
8
2.77%
🔥
8
2.77%
💩
3
1.04%
🙏
2
0.692%
👀
1
0.346%
👏
1
0.346%
💯
1
0.346%
🕊
1
0.346%
😢
1
0.346%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خب طبق قول و بنا به درخواست تعداد زیادی از رفقای کامیونیتی پروژه های که فعال هستم رو اینجا دوباره معرفی میکنم، تمام این پروژه ها رو قبلا با وحید @george_yule1367 بطورکامل معرفی کردیم و براش آموزش نوشتیم، هرچند طبق معمول خیلی ها اون تایم توجه نکردن و الان که یهو دوباره یه هایپی تو کامیونتی راه افتاده، میخوان وارد بشن. اگر با رشتوهای قبلی ما وارد شده باشین احتمال زیاد الان جز ارلی ها هستین و امتیاز بالا گرفتین. اگر هم…
درمورد بیت هم هنوز همین نظرو دارم درموردش، ولی فقط یه مشکلی داره خیلی لفتش داده، پس شاید یه سر به 60500 بزنه و این حدودا بعد بریم برای تست 72-70
رسید 70 -72 یه یادآوری کنید من چک کنم باز
اگرم شورت گرفتید، یه تیکی تاکا بالاتر از سقف شدو قبلی در نظر بگیرید که لیک نشید
#BTC
طلا اینجاها حمایت شد، و رفت بالا، من اینو یادم رفته بود بفرستم، اینجا باشه من یادم نره باز اشتباهی شورت بگیرم،
اکر این استخر قرمز رو هفتگی به بالا بشکنه، روندش صعودی میشه، در غیر این صورت ریزش داریم، 3800 -3400 نقاط ورود من هستن، 3400 شاید نرسه، 3800 نقدینگی ضعیفی داره، ولی میتونه ری اکشن بده بهش
3380-3400 هم قبل استخر قرمز، میتونن نقاط حساسی باشن، تو تایم فریم پایینتر چکشون کنید
#XAU
https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20260805
زیاد دازه پخش میشه، IRGC از لیست تحریما خارج شد، ولی خب اورجینالش اینجاس
تو این اگهی درمورد حذف تگ تروریستی ۳ تا شرکت هواپیمایی و ۲ تا هواپیما توضیح داده
Pouya Air
Yas Air
Pouya Air Lines
این سه تا شرکت (۲ تا هستن دراصل) و دوتا هواپیما
هیچ توضیحی داده نشده درمورد علت لغو تحریم ها، سپاه از لیست تحریم ها خارج نشده
دلیل تحریماشون مشخص بود، ادعای ارتباط با سپاه، حمل اس…
ازاینجا نا حدود ۵۰ دلارم اومد
ولی انتظار ریزش بیشتری ازش دارم
#hype
شاید بتونه تو قدم اول ۴۰-۴۲ رو ببینه، ازاونجا ریبالانس بشه، و بعد بیاد بالا
یا اینکه بره رو نقاط سبزپایینتر
این ۳ تا نقطه میتونن نقاطذخرید باشن، ولی درنظر بگیرید، وصعیت مارکت بده پول نیست و پرپ ها دارن زیاد میشن
من تو کریپتو ۵-۶ درصد رو به هایپ اختصاص میدم
شایعاتی از جنگ و چیز میز و این چیزا تو درسای سرخ به گوش میرسه، یه نفتکش عربستانو با چندتا موشک زدن،
جدا ازاون بازم اسراییل دستور تخلیه چندتا روستارو داده تو لبنان
کمربندارو سفت ببندیم یا زوده؟
جف اشمید (رئیس فدرال رزرو کانزاسسیتی) و آلبرتو موسالم (رئیس فدرال رزرو سنتلوئیس) هر دو گفتند سیاست فعلی فدرال رزرو هنوز به اندازه کافی سختگیرانه نیست. موسالم هم اضافه کرد که اگر حق رای داشت، در نشست قبلی از افزایش یک واحدی یا همون ۰.۲۵٪ نرخ بهره حمایت میکردن
هردو این اشخاص، عضو های فاقد قدرت رای دهی هستن
نتیجه برای کریپتو :
این اظهارات احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره در ماههای آینده را بیشتر کرده است. در کوتاهمدت این …
این چندروزه سرم نسبتا شلوغه
امروز نرخ بهره افزایش پیدا نکرد
ولی یک نکته داشت این عدم تغییر نرخ بهره
۳ رای مخالف کاهش یا ثابت بودن نرخ بهره داده شد
این یعنی ۳ نفر از اعضا خواهان افزایس نرخ بهره هستن، این یعنی پیام اینا نسبتا هاوکیش بود
فردا توی چنل کارون یه ویس ۶-۱۰ دقیقه ای میگم و نظر خودمو با تحلیل اعلام میکنم که بتونید دیدگاه منم کنار دیدگاه خودتون بسنجید
درمورد کلیت بازار
نفت خیلی مهم هست، و الان تو دو جبهه به مشکل خورده، گلوگاه اصلی تنگه هرمر و اسیب به زیرساختهای بزرگ نفتی گازی که اثرش طولانی مدترت هست
تنگه باب المندب که بیشتر لجستیکی هست، و مسدود شدنش جلوی عبور مرور نفتو نمیکیره ولی مسیر ترانزیت رو خیلی خیلی طولانی تر میکنه و ایندیعنی فشار رو لجستیک جهانی
افت نفت جمعه کمی از فشار بازار قیمتا نسبت به جمعه کم شد، اما داستان اصلی هنوز تغییر نکرده: نرخهای بلندمدت بال…
❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ScamOfcrspto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کریپتو (رمزارزها) *بیشتر حوزهی ترید و سرمایهگذاری44%
بورس ایران26%
بورس آمریکا7%
فارکس19%
طلا، نقره، مس و کامودیتیها43%
زمین و مسکن15%
خودرو8%
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ScamOfcrspto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@george_yule1367 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💢 تفکرات پیمان @tafakkoratpeyman · 26,365 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Navid Shokriyan (نوید شکریان) @icoandidoupdate · 670,510 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
⚜Xanastrology⚜ @xanastrology · 45,218 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
قرمز @gheermeez · 26,951 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Bitpin Academy | آکادمی بیتپین @Bitpin_Academy · 37,432 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
رهام صادقی | بیست و یک @bistoyekrypto · 40,624 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
دوره های آموزش زبان @LearnLangs · 24,485 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Alireza.S @cryptobyalireza · 37,263 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoScam” (@ScamOfcrspto), 2,036 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScamOfcrspto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.