Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LINE💊 (中文:"賴"又稱 "爛")

Channel

LINE💊 (中文:"賴"又稱 "爛")

@AntiLine_TW

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

464subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291275503
TypeChannel
Username@AntiLine_TW
Created16 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AntiLine_TW

Growth

464471467.56 August 2026 — 471 subscribers6 August 2026 — 471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 470 subscribers19 August 2026 — 469 subscribers26 August 2026 — 466 subscribers2 September 2026 — 464 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 463–472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 17:55464-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:53466-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:02469-1
13 Aug 2026, 09:24470-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:02471no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:04471first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 December 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩1225.0%
👎1020.8%
👍714.6%
😁714.6%
🎉36.25%
🤮36.25%
24.17%
🔥24.17%
😱24.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2020 to 29 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2024, 17:06 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

7 Dec 2021, 10:55 UTC≈5,800 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[新聞] 驚!LINE Pay洩漏交易個資 台灣逾7萬用戶受影響

👎7💩7😁5🎉2👍2🔥2😱2

22 Oct 2021, 04:00 UTC≈6,120 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

以為用Line老共就看不到? 日本總公司承認 允許中國業者看個資

💩3🤮3👍2

31 May 2021, 10:50 UTC≈6,700 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

熱門回應: 垃圾Line正常發揮 早就改用Telegram

👎2💩2

31 May 2021, 10:49 UTC≈6,070 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Line淪陷了嗎... 如圖 為什麼現在line也變成這樣... 一堆人都辦官方帳號(灰色盾牌) 點進去都是可以直接加好友聊天的 官方帳號可以幹嘛嗎... 除了店家企業網紅 一般人辦到底要幹嘛 Line不是用來通訊的嗎 他這樣跟有些男生IG的搜尋頁面有什麼兩樣 https://www.dcard.tw/f/mood/p/236126616

🎉1👍1

25 Apr 2021, 02:15 UTCviews —

LINE💊 (中文:"賴"又稱 "爛") pinned «LINE爆資安疑慮 日本總務省打算停用»

19 Mar 2021, 11:31 UTC≈6,450 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

LINE爆資安疑慮 日本總務省打算停用

1👎1😁1

17 Mar 2021, 09:51 UTC≈9,140 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

LINE 驚傳資安事件,中國外包工程師可查看用戶個資與對話

👍1😁1

15 Mar 2021, 09:28 UTC≈4,020 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

LINE狂閃退!一傳貼圖強制關閉 網哀嚎:刪掉重灌沒用 [問題] S10e更新後Line出問題 [請益] 請問Line的閃退問題 LINE今天也閃退的請進

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AntiLine_TW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LINE💊 (中文:"賴"又稱 "爛")” (@AntiLine_TW), 464 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AntiLine_TW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.