Take care of yourself ❤🩹
🫡43❤21🙏5💔4

Channel
@Armemo_offical
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,585subscribers
+246 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001259755086 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Armemo_offical |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Armemo_offical |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 11,585 | +27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 11,558 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 11,540 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 11,532 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 11,524 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 11,511 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 11,509 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 11,507 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 11,510 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 11,506 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 11,500 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 11,495 | +11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 11,484 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 11,474 | +13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 11,461 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 11,449 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 11,443 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 11,439 | +16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 11,423 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 11,416 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (21 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72,680 |
| Reactions total | 1,285 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,248 reactions across 66 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 682 | 30.3% | |
| 💔 | 308 | 13.7% | |
| 👏 | 176 | 7.83% | |
| 👌 | 172 | 7.65% | |
| 🔥 | 167 | 7.43% | |
| 👍 | 162 | 7.21% | |
| 😁 | 133 | 5.92% | |
| 😢 | 120 | 5.34% | |
| 🙏 | 104 | 4.63% | |
| 🤣 | 80 | 3.56% | |
| 🫡 | 67 | 2.98% | |
| 🤔 | 59 | 2.62% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 0.801% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Take care of yourself ❤🩹
🫡43❤21🙏5💔4
I think I need to step away from social media for a while. Lately, I've been feeling like I'm spending too much time here and not enough time actually living. Some things are better experienced quietly, away from screens, notifications, and everyone's opinions. So, if I suddenly disappear, don't take it personally. I'm not leaving because of anyone, and there’s no big story behind it. I just need some time to myself…
❤32😢5👏2👍1
#አይሲድ_ከበሌ በቤኒሻንጉል ጉምዝ ጉባ ወረዳ መከተል ዞን የካቲት 24 በ2014 ዓ.ም ሰውን በእሳት እያቃጠሉ ቪድዮ ቀርጸው የለቀቁ የወታደር ልብስ የለበሱ አካላት ናቸው። EHRC በዜና አርቲክሉ ላይ እንደዘገበው 11 ሲቪሎች በደህንነት ኃይሎች ከተገደሉ በኋላ አስከሬኖቻቸው ተቃጥለዋል፤ ከእነሱ መካከል አንዱ በሕይወት እያለ ታስሮ ወደ እሳት እንደተጣለ የተመረመረው ሪፖርት አረጋጧል። Ethiopia Insight ሆነ የUN ሰነድም የተለያዩ ምንጮችን ጠቅሶ በዚያኑ ቀን ሰዎችሁ ተይዘው ክፉኛ ተደብድበውና ተገድለው እንደተቃጠሉ፤ ከዚያም አንድ ሰው በሕይወት እያለ እንደተቃጠለ ከግፍ ፈጻሚዎችሁ የቪድዮ ቅጂ ማረጋገጥ ተችሏል። #የ2014ቱ_የታህሳሱ_ጭፍጨፋም ሌላ ት…
💔20😢3👍2
ይህ የፖለቲካ ሳይኮሎጂ ሰውን «ወንጀለኛ» ወይም «ክፉ» ብሎ መጥራት በእሱ ላይ የሚደርስበት ግፍ እንደመደበኛ ወይም እንደምክኒያታዊነት እንዲቀበሉት የማድረጊያ ሲስተም ነው። «ሁለት ፋኖዎች ዛሬ ገድለናል፣ አራት ጁንታዎች ተረሽነዋል፣ አንድ ክፈለ ጦር ሸኔ ደምስሰናል!» የሚለው የስም ታፔላ የሟችሁን ሞት ዋጋ የሚያሳንስ Dehumanization ነው። ሌላውን ሰው እንደ ሙሉ ሰው ማየት ሲቀር ሞታቸው «እነሱ» የሚል የቁጥር ስያሜ ተሰጥቶት ዋጋ ያለው ክብር ህይወትን የማሳነስ እስራቴጂ ነው። በጁንታው እና በፋኖ ከለላ ስማቸው፣ ቤተሰባቸው፣ ሕልማቸው፣ ፍርሃታቸው እና ሕይወታቸው በሌላ ሰው ዓይን ይረክሳል። ያኔ ነው ሰውን መግደል እንደነፍስ ማጥፋት ከማሰብ ይልቅ …
💔13😢4❤2👍1
ዛሬ በዚህ ጉዳይ የመጨረሻ ፖለቲካል አርቲክሌ ነው። ስለዚህ እስከመጨረሻው በማንበብ እንሰነባበት። መጻፉ ላይ ልምድ ቢኖረኝም መረጃ ለማሰባሰብና የመረጃውን ተአማኒነት ለማረጋገጥ ግን ብዙ ሰዓት ፈጅቶብኛል። ስለዚህ ላይክ በማድረግ ጀምሩ። በሀገራችን ኢትዮጲያ ጦርነት የተለመደ አሳዛኝ ክስተት ነው። በተለይ ከደርግ እስከ ኢሕአዴግ ብዙ የእርስ በእርስ ጦርነቶችን አስተናግደናል። ነገር ግን ከ2010 በኋላ የመጣው የሽግግር መንግስት ተከትሎ ታይቶ የማይታወቅ የሰብዓዊነት ጭካኔ በሀገራችን ኢትዮጲያ ተፈጽሟል። ይህ የጭካኔ አካሄድ የተለመደ ነገር ቢሆን ፖለቲካዊ ሰብዓዊነትን በመንፈግ ጥቃትን ወደ ትዕይንት በመቀየር ፎቶ እና ቪድዮ ሰርተው የሚለቁ አውሬዎች መብዛታቸው…
😢13💔8❤6👍4👏2
Sticker, posted without a caption
💔14😢7❤1
ሰላም አስከባሪ ስንመለከት ሰላማችንን እያጣን ነው! 🇪🇹⚔ @Armemo_offical
🔥39❤11😁11💔5👍4
የአዲስ አበባ ልጅ መሆንና ከተጣሉ ባል እና ሚስት መሃል መሆን አንድ ነው፤ የሚጎዳው ልጁ ነው! 😐 @Armemo_offical
😢20💔10😁7❤4
በርግጥ አንዳንድ ወንዶች ፌሚኒዝምን የሚደግፉት ሴትን እንደነፃ ሰብዓዊ ፍጡር ስለሚመለከቷት ነው፤ ሌሎች በተቃራኒው ፌሚኒዝምን የራሳቸውን ማህበራዊ ምስል ለመገንባት ይጠቀሙበታል። የመጀመሪያው ሰውዬ ለአንድ መርህ የቆመ ነው፤ ሁለተኛው ሰው ግን በመርሁ በኩል ራሱን የሚሸጥ asshole ነው። አንደኛው «ይህ ትክክል ስለሆነ እደግፈዋለሁ» ይላል፤ ሌላውኛው በተቃራኒው «ይህን ብናገር እኮ እኔን እንደ ጥሩ፣ እንደ ዘመናዊ እና ሴቶችን የሚያከብር ወንድ እንድታይ ያደርገኛል» ብሎ የሚያስብ ዘገምት ነው። ልዩነታቸው በቃላቱ ላይ ሳይሆን በዓላማቸው ላይ ነው። ይህን አካሄድ በሳይኮሎጂው «validation seeking እና impression management» ይባላል። …
👌16❤8😁3👍1🤔1
ትናንት አንድ ሽልጥልጥ ወንድ አጋጥሞኝ አንጀቴ ተቃጥሎ ነበር የዋልኩት። ወንድ እንደወንድነቱ እንጂ በሴቶች ለመወደድ የማይሆን ሴታሴት ባህሪ ሲያሳይ ዓሳ እንደሚያድን የጫካ ሰው በጦር ውጋው ውጋው የሚል ስሜት ነው የሚፈጥርብኝ። ልጁ ወጣት ነገር ነው። ችግሩ እሱ አይደለም። ችግሩ ሴቶችን አለቅጥ ማወደስና ወንዶችን ማጥላላት የሚወድ ቫፋንኩሎ ነገር መሆኑ ነው!። በዛ ላይ ፌሚኒዝምንን እንደሃይማኖት የሚሰብክ ቆለጥ አይን ጭምርም ነው። እኔም የዋዛ አይደለውም አንገት እስከመታነቅ የሚያደርስ ሎጃካሊ ስድብ ሰድቤው ልብስ ተያያዝን። በርግጥ አያገባኝም ነበር። ነገር ግን ሴቶች እንዲስቁለት በእኔ ላይ ሙድ ለመያዝ ሲሞክር መጀመርያ ሙዝ በመያዝ ጠግቦ ማደር እንዳለበት …
👏15🔥4❤1👍1
Ah shit.. here we go again. I don’t even feel like reacting anymore. Some days, you just get tired of everything and put your phone down. Maybe silence is better than trying to explain yourself!
💔22❤12😢5👍2
የኦሾን በእኛ ሀገር የተተረጎመውን ትቼ ብቻ የውጭ መፅሐፍቶችሁን ከ14 በላይ አንብቢያለሁ። ከ20 ያላነሱም ኢንተርቪዎችሁን ደጋግሜ ተመልክቻለሁ። ይህን ስናገር ፉከራ ሳይሆን በ«Addiction» እና «Obsession» መካከል ያለውን ልዩነት ለማሳየት ነው። የኦሾ ንጹህ ወይይት፣ ዲቤት እና ቀጥታ ንግግሩን ማዳመጥ ሱስ ሳይሆን መለከፍ ነበር የሆነብኝ። በተለይ ሲናገር በጣም መረጋጋት ብቻ ሳይሆን በቃላቶችሁ መጨረሻ ላይ የሚጠቀመው «እስስ» የሚለው የድምፅ ቃና አንድን ሰው ሂፕኖታይዝ የማድረግ ኃይል አለው። ኦሾ መፅሐፍ ጽፎ አያውቅም። ነገር ግን በአስርት አመታት ውስጥ ብዙ ኢንተርቪዎች ተደርጓል። ከዛ ኢንተርቪው ተወስዶ ከ700 በላይ መፅሐፍ በስሙ ተጽፏል። አ…
❤28🔥10🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @Armemo_offical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Armemo_offical edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“አርምሞ🧘🏽♂” (@Armemo_offical), 11,585 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Armemo_offical.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.