Channel
@Zephilosophy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,052subscribers
+409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001163708603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zephilosophy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zephilosophy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 32,052 | +29 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 32,023 | +37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 31,986 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:46 | 31,967 | +15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 31,952 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 31,939 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 31,926 | +19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 31,907 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 31,888 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 31,875 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 31,876 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 31,891 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 31,885 | +20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 31,865 | +27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 31,838 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 31,828 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 31,824 | +11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 31,813 | +20 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 31,793 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 31,781 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (21 May 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 52,710 |
| Reactions total | 690 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,384 reactions across 30 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,412 | 59.2% | |
| 👍 | 614 | 25.8% | |
| 🔥 | 112 | 4.70% | |
| 👏 | 80 | 3.36% | |
| 👎 | 36 | 1.51% | |
| 😢 | 31 | 1.30% | |
| 💔 | 20 | 0.839% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 0.755% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 0.419% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.378% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 0.336% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.294% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.252% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.252% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.168% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.126% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.126% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.084% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.084% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.042% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Zephilosophy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
እኛ የትኛውን ነን? ━━━━━━━━ "Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?" — David Hume, Principal Writings on Religion... (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 100 ━━━━━━━ ✥ ━━━━━━━ "ክፋትን ለማስቀረት ፈቃደኝነቱ ኖሮት፣ ነገር ግን አቅሙ የለውም? እንግዲያውስ እርሱ ደካማ ነው። ክፋትን ለማስቀረት አቅሙ አለው፣ ነገር ግን ፈቃደኝነቱ የለውም? እንግዲያውስ እርሱ ክፉ…
❤23👍14👏3
ይሄ የኔ ትውልድ (የዚህ ፅሁፍ ባለቤት፣ እራሱን ከትውልዱ መገለጫዎች አልነጠለም፣ አይነጥልም። ፅሁፉም ፍፁም ጅምላ ምደባ አይደለም) — ይሄ የኔ ትውልድ የተካደ ትውልድ ነው። ከገዛ ዘመኑ ተገፍቶ ላለመውደቅ ዳር የሚውተረተር ምስኪን። ሀገር የሚያስረክቡት መስሎት ደጅ በመጥናት ሲንከራተት ቆይቶ ገሚሱ ወደ ሃይማኖት ቤት፣ ገሚሱ ወደ መጠጥ ቤት፣ ገሚሱ ወደ ቴክኖሎጂ ዋሻዎች፣ ሌላው ወደ ጫት የተሰደደ፣ ቀሪው በእግር ኳስ ያበደ። ከኋላው «ከንቱ ትውልድ» የሚል የሂያጁ ትውልድ ስድብ የሚከተለው። — ለሁሉ ነገር አቋራጭ ያሰላል። ዲቪ ይማጠናል። ነገሩ ሁሉ ለብ ለብ ነው።ፍቅሩ ለብ ለብ። እውቀቱ ለብ ለብ። ጥልቀት ይጨንቀዋል። አለመደውም። አላስለመዱትም።ለዚህ ለኔ …
👍39❤23🔥5
የስነ ልቦና ህክምና ዋና አላማው ግለሰቦችን ማከም እና ወደ ማህበረሰቡ መደበኛ የእለት ተእለት እንቅስቃሴ መመለስ ነው። ነገር ግን አንድ ግለሰብ ሊላመደው የሚገደደው ማህበረሰብ ራሱ በበሽታ የተበከለ ቢሆንስ? ችግሩ ያለው ስቃይ ላይ ባለው ግለሰብ አእምሮ ውስጥ ሳይሆን እብደቱን እና ስቃዩን በማምረት ላይ ባለው የማህበራዊና ኢኮኖሚያዊ መዋቅር ውስጥ ከሆነስ? እንደ Michel Foucault እና Erich Fromm ያሉ የማህበራዊ ሳይንስ ባለሙያዎች እንደሚከራከሩት ዘመናዊው ማህበራዊ መዋቅር ሰዎችን ከተፈጥሮአዊ ማንነታቸው ከእውነተኛ ፍላጎቶቻቸው እና ከሌሎች ሰዎች ጋር ካላቸው ጥልቅ ግንኙነት ይነጥላቸዋል። ማህበረሰቡ ለውድድር፣ ለቁሳቁስ መሰብሰብ፣ ለውጫዊ ስ…
❤51👍14👏3🔥3🥰2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10
"የአንድ የሞራል ልሽቀት የገጠመው ትውልድና ማህበረሰብ ምልክት ለሀገርና ለህዝብ የሚጠቅም የምርምርና የእውቅት ብርሃን ከሚያበሩለት እንዲሁም የበጎ ስራ ከሚሰሩ ብልህ ልሂቃን ይልቅ በቀልድና በማይረባ ወሬ ግዜውን እየገደሉ ለሚጫወቱበት የበለጠ ክብርና ትኩረት ሲሰጥ ሲታይ ነው።" ፊዮዶር ዶስቶቪስኪ @zephilosophy
❤85👍17✍8🤝6
"እነሆ አንቺ ውብ ነሽ። እንደመኖር ታስፈሪያለሽ። እንደ ትርጉም ታማልያለሽ። ጸጉርሽ ከኪዮራን ቃላት ይጠቁራል። አይንሽ ከመሆን ጥያቄ ይጠልቃል፣ ከዳንቴ ሃሳብ ይርቃል። ከንፈርሽ ከሶፎ ስንኝ ይጥማል። አንደበተሽ ከሼክስፒር ተውኔት ይረቃል። አዕምሮሽ እንደ ራንድ ነጻነት ኃያል፣ እንደ ራስል አመክንዮ የጠራ፣ እንደ ሶቅራጥስ ጥያቄም እረፍት አልባ ነው። መገኘትሽ እንደኒቼ ገደል ጥልቅ፣ ዝምታሽም እንደ ቡድሃ መንፈስም የሰከነ ነው።...አንቺ የፕላቶ ውበት፣ የኢፒኩረስ ደስታ፣ የሆሜር ግጥም፣ የቤቶቨን ሙዚቃ ነሽ።...." ✍️ ዮናታን አቢስ @zephilosophy
❤71😁9👏8🥰6👀3👎3👍1
መማር ከማሰብ ጋር እኩል አይደለም .... የኢትዮጵያ “ምሁራን” ፈተና አንዳንድ ጊዜ የአንድን ሕዝብ የአስተሳሰብ ደረጃ ለመለካት የሚያነሳቸውን ጥያቄዎች ማየት ብቻ ይበቃል። ዓለም በArtificial Intelligence፣ በኳንተም ኮምፒውቲንግ፣ በሮቦቲክስ፣ በጂን ቴክኖሎጂ፣ በንጹሕ ኃይልና በሕዋ ምርምር ስለሚመጣው ሃምሳ ዓመት ሲያስብ፣ እኛ ግን በ2026 ቆመን “ይህች ከተማ የማን ናት?”፣ “ይህ መሬት በፊት የማን ነበር?”፣ “የማን አያት ቀድሞ ኖረበት?” ብለን ወደ ኋላ እያየን ነው። የትናንትን ቁስል ማወቅ አስፈላጊ ነው፤ በቁስሉ ውስጥ ቤት ሠርቶ መኖር ግን የወደፊት ፖለቲካ አይደለም። ዛሬ በኢትዮጵያ ፖለቲካ ትልቁ ችግር የሐሳብ እጥረት ነው። በተለ…
👍92❤54🔥12💯10👏8🥰3👎1
"ፍርሀትን ራሱን ማርበድበድ" ያዕቆብ ብርሀኑ ይህችን ዓለም አንቀጥቅጦ የሚገዛት ፍቅር፣ ገንዘብ፣ ሞት፣ ስልጣን ወይስ ፍርሃት? መልሱ ሙዝ የመላጥ ያህል ቀላል ነው፡፡ ይህችን ዓለም በበላይነት የሚያስተዳድራት ፍርሃት ነው፡፡ ከስልጣን መውረድን መፍራት፣ ውርደትን መፍራት፣ እጦትን መፍራት....ፍርሃት፣ ፍርሃት፣ ፍርሃት... ብዙ መልኮች ያሉት ፍርሃት፡፡ ራሳችሁን ነፃ አድርጋችሁ ይህችን ግብስብስ ዓለም ብትመለከቷት፣ ሰብዓዊያን በሙሉ ይህን የፍርሃት ነውጥ በመሸሽ፣ እንደ ዶሮ ጫጩት ሲተራመሱ ማየት ትችላላችሁ፡፡ ሌላው ቢቀር የኤሊ ቆዳ ሻካራነት ስያሜ ማጣት ቢያሳስበን መልስ ለመሻት ‹‹በድሮ ጊዜ ኤሊ ከአእዋፋት ጋር ለግብዣ ሰማይ ቤት ተጠርታ...›› የሚል …
❤79👍13👏6🥰5
አገራዊ ሰርግ ተዘጋጅቷል። ሞት የሚወለድበት ድግስ ተደግሷል። ድንቁርናና መንበር ተጋብተው ሞትን ወለዱ። አሁንም አላዋቂነትና ስልጣን ተጋብተው በላይ በላዩ ሞትን ይወልዳሉ። ዛሬም ብሔራዊ ድግስ አለ፥ መንበርና ድንቁርና ዳግመኛ ይጣመራሉ። ከሰርጉ በኋላ ሞት ይወለዳል። "እናት አባት ሲሞት በአገር ይለቀሳል እህት ወንድም ሲሞት በአገር ይለቀሳል አገር የሞተ ቀን ወዴት ይደረሳል" ማልቀስ እፈልጋለሁ። ትውልዴን የሚወክል እንባ ማፈሰስ እመኛለሁ። አንች ከፈቀድሽልኝ ማቅ እለብሳለሁ ፥ ደረት እደቃለሁ፥ ፀጉር እነጫለሁ፥አመድ በላዬ ነስንሼ "ወየው" እላለሁ። ማልቀስ ፍቀጂልኝ። በእኔ ላይ ያለሽን ስልጣን ተጠቅመሽ እንዳለቅስ እዘዢ። "እየፈረሰች ስላለች አገርህ አ…
❤40😢31👍11👎5👏4
ጥቂት ነጥቦች ስለ አልኬሚ የረቂቁ አልኬሚ ፍልስፍና መስራች ስሙ ሐርሜስ ትሪስሜጊስተስ (Hermes Trismegistus) ይባላል፡፡ እግዚአብሔራዊ አረዳዳችን ላይ ከቀኖና የተሻገረ ረቂቅ አምልኮአዊ ፍልስፍና ካረቀቁ ሰዎች ቀዳሚው እሱ ሳይሆን አይቀርም፡፡ ግብጻዊ ቢሆንም ግሪካዊያን የሚጠቀሙባቸውን 42 የሚደርሱ መጻሕፍት የጻፋቸው እርሱ እንደሆነ ይታመናል፡፡ ሰውዬው ፍጹም የላቀ ሰው ነበር፡፡ የሳይንስ፣ የሐይማኖታዊ ዕሳቤዎች፣ ሒሳብ፣ ጂኦሜትሪ፣ አልኬሚ፣ ሕክምና፣ ፍልስፍና እና አስማት የመሣሠሉ ጥበባት ሁሉ መስራች መሆኑ ይነገርለታል፡፡ ሙሴ በእስራኤል ታሪክ ታላቁ ነብይ ሆኖ እስራኤላዊያንን ከአራት መቶ ዘመናት አገዛዝ ቀንበር ነጻ ከማውጣቱ በፊት ከኢትዮጵ…
❤45👍10🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
👍57❤25🔥10💔4👏2
"የሰው ልጅ ከተፈጥሮ ጋር መቃቃር የጀመረው ራሱን ከተፈጥሮ ሁሉ የበላይ አድርጎ መመልከት ሲጀመር ነው።ለዚህም መነሻ ምክንያት የክርስትና አስተምህሮ ነው።" ብሩህ አለምነህ በሰው ልጅ ታሪክ ውስጥ ሰፊ ዘመናትን የያዙት የባርያ ንግድ፣ ቅኝ ግዛት፣ የተለያዩ ዓይነት ባርነቶችና የሴቶች ጭቆናዎች ሁሉ መንስኤያቸው የሰው ልጅ መቆጣጠርንና ጥቅምን ዓላማው ባደረገ አስተሳሰብ መመራቱ ነው፡፡ አንድን ነገር “መቆጣጠር” ካሰብክ ራስህን የዚያ ነገር አካል አድርገህ ማሰብህን አቁመሃል፡፡ “መቆጣጠር” የሚለው ሀሳብ የሚመጣው ራስህን ከዚያ ነገር ለይተህ ስታየው ነው፡፡ እናም አውሮፓውያን በዚህ መንገድ ተጉዘው ራሳቸውን ከተፈጥሮ ገነጠሉ፤ ራሳቸውን ከተፈጥሮ መገንጠል ብቻ…
❤51👍12👎7
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Zephilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Zephilosophy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Zephilosophy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ፍልስፍና ለላቀ አስተሳሰብ” (@Zephilosophy), 32,052 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zephilosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.