Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,616–7,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 17:17
7,474
-8
3 Nov 2026, 14:46
7,482
-7
31 Oct 2026, 06:30
7,489
-4
28 Oct 2026, 09:59
7,493
-1
25 Oct 2026, 04:50
7,494
-7
22 Oct 2026, 11:55
7,501
+24
19 Oct 2026, 00:16
7,477
+100
15 Oct 2026, 22:04
7,377
-10
13 Oct 2026, 07:51
7,387
+23
7 Oct 2026, 08:57
7,364
-21
30 Sept 2026, 19:40
7,385
-1
16 Sept 2026, 12:20
7,386
-27
12 Sept 2026, 20:18
7,413
-8
9 Sept 2026, 07:21
7,421
+101
4 Sept 2026, 09:57
7,320
+40
1 Sept 2026, 07:05
7,280
-9
29 Aug 2026, 15:33
7,289
+47
26 Aug 2026, 13:27
7,242
+37
23 Aug 2026, 19:24
7,205
+4
20 Aug 2026, 02:35
7,201
first reading
Engagement
122 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
84.7%
avg views ÷ 7,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 122 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
122 (30 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
164,520
Reactions total
2,818
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈623
Videos
≈52
Links
≈1,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,989 reactions across 103 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,117
31.2%
💯
2,165
21.7%
👎
1,445
14.5%
🤔
1,148
11.5%
❤
718
7.19%
🔥
647
6.48%
🙏
500
5.01%
😡
178
1.78%
👌
41
0.41%
🤝
18
0.18%
🫡
12
0.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,991 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (80.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
При снабжении в условиях «килл-зоны» основной упор сделан на беспилотные технологии: на глубине до 30 км от ЛБС имущество доставляется только БПЛА и роботами
Начальник Тыла МО РФ В. Солодчук
Это фактически первое официальное признание размеров Зоны Активных Боевых Действий ( Полосы Боевого Соприкосновения) со стороны нашего Министерства Обороны.
Когда официальные лица заявляют об " освобождении / взятии под контроль…
По подсчётам АН, потери противника в октябре 2026 года составили:
невозвратные ( убиты/ пбв/плен) : около 6 тысяч , санитарные: около 10 тысяч,
СОЧ: около 20 тысяч .
Пополнение:
Первичная мобилизация: около 16 тысяч
Излеченные и вернувшиеся из СОЧ : 10 тысяч.
В условиях характера ведущихся боевых действий , и полагаю, оперативно- тактических планов сторон , главный ресурс окончательно стал второстепенным фактором в…
При всем при этом сейчас, помимо минимальных потерь с обеих сторон, на передовой находится самое минимальное количество военнослужащих с обеих сторон за все время СВО.
И находятся они в Зоне Активных Боевых Действий ( также самой большой и широкой за все время войны) практически в перемешанном состоянии.
Если повезет, штурмовые двойки и тройки с обеих сторон могут проходить её насквозь из конца в конец.
Причем, чет…
Последние две недели противник по всей линии фронта практически полностью отказался от применения бронетехники, артиллерии, РСЗО и авиации ( КАБов) в качестве огневого обеспечения действий пехоты.
Только дроны и НТРК, в некоторых случаях стрелковый огневой контакт с использованием миномётов и гранатомётов.
С нашей стороны летит все что только можно : КАБы, КУСы, РСЗО и ТОСы.
При этом тактическая наступательная иниц…
Главными подстрекателями Д. Трампа к войне с Ираном были Госсекретарь М. Рубио, Председатель комитета Сената по Вооруженным Силам Р. Уокер, Директор ЦРУ Д. Рэдклифф , партнер по гольфу покойный пидорас Л. Грэм и конечно дружбан Б. Нетаньяху.
Министр обороны симпатяга П. Хегсет- туповатый преданный исполнитель и служака , просто взял под козырек, когда ему дали команду.
Если и увольнять виновников поражения респуб…
Сегодня противник попытался провернуть такой же финт, как накануне с Кстовском и Ярославскими НПЗ с Московским НПЗ ( в который раз) и Рязанским НПЗ.
Не вышло. Все сбито.
UPD: днём была попытка атаковать Тюменский НПЗ. Ни один дрон не долетел.
Разгром республиканцев на промежуточных выборах наглядно подтверждает железное американское правило:
абсолютных необходимых факторов , напрямую оказывающих влияние на решение избирателей только три.
1.Цены на бензин
2. Доля государственно покрытия в Medicare/Medicaid;
3.Средневзвешенный размер дивидендов в списке "Forbes Global-2000".
Если хотя бы один показатель из этих трёх перед выборами "барахлит" ( цены растут…
Назначив В. Мединского главой переговорщиков в Абу - Даби, Верховный совершенно четко обозначил, чего ждет от этих переговоров - горящих пердаков упырей с той стороны стола, вследствии жесткого исторического троллинга.
Если бы хотел оперативного технически конкретного результата, послал бы чекиста грушника или дипломата
ВКС вышли на "зимний режим" работы по энергетике противника в его глубоком тылу.
До октября в месяц наносились 3-5 МРДУ с применением баллистических ракет ( из них 1-2 МРДУ с комбинированным применением также авиационных и морских крылатых ракет.
БР и КР летели в сопровождении ударных БПЛА в количествах в 2-3 раза больше, чем среднесуточные партии ударных дронов.
С октября МРДУ наносятся через каждые 3-4 дня ( 7-8 …
Противник в последние дни изменил тактику нанесения массированных ударов БПЛА по объектам в глубине России.
Если раньше БПЛА в основном летели либо веером по всей длине Фронта, либо большими группами по нескольким направлениям и целям, то последние дни практически вся масса прорывается на одном участке на первой линии ПВО и летит затем по одной конкретной цели ( вчера Кстовский НПЗ, сегодня Ярославский НПЗ) .
Это по…
В отличии от Т.Карлсона противник ( в основном лично В.Зеленский) несет пропагандистскую ахинею каждый день.
(Почему ему до сих пор не заткнули фонтан? Не понимаю... )
Не буду её повторять и цитировать.
Ситуация за октябрь повторяет предыдущие месяцы:
1. Движения по фронту практически нет. Общий значимый оперативно- тактический баланс( взятие территории под устойчивый контроль) + 150 км в нашу пользу - Доброполье, …
Не ожидал такой х... ни в стиле В. Зеленского от Такера Карлсона.
( о подготовке ядерного удара по Ирану)
Грубая дурацкая спекуляция перед выборами...
Хотя здорово бы было !
Это бы сняло вбитые полувековой анти ядерной пропагандой основанной на диких преувеличениях и прямой лжи, шоры и самозапреты у нашего ВПР на способ закончить войну полной победой за один день.
Нанесение ударов тактическим СБП по паре стратегиче…
💯76👍22🤔12❤7👎6😡3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @Aslannahusheff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Aslannahusheff edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Aslannahusheff as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
6 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аслан Нахушев” (@Aslannahusheff), 7,474 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aslannahusheff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.